Skip to main content
Log in

A Corporate Approach to Social Monitoring and Assessment for Development in a Fragile Environment

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prevailing corporate trend regardingdevelopment of energy resources in the tropics emphasizesfinancial gain over long-term societal benefits. Somecorporations are beginning to find a competitive advantage linkedto proactive relations with host communities and adequateprotection of fragile ecosystems. Herein, we describe a casestudy where an international energy production company workedwith stakeholders to achieve social capital and sustainabledevelopment. The strategies aimed to strengthen local capacity toimprove social welfare and to ensure conservation and wise use ofbiodiversity. We provide examples, discuss lessons learned andmake recommendations for future development projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso, A. and Dallmeier, F. (eds.): 1998, Biodiversity Assessment and Long-term Monitoring of the Lower Urubamba Region in Peru: Urubamba and Camisea Rivers and the Cashiriari-3 Well Site, SI/MAB Series #2, Smithsonian Institution/MAB Biodiversity Program, Washington, DC.

  • Alonso, A. and Dallmeier, F. (eds.): 1999, Biodiversity Assessment and Long-term Monitoring of the Lower Urubamba Region in Peru: Pagoreni, Assessment and Training, SI/MAB Series #3, Smithsonian Institution/MAB Biodiversity Program, Washington, DC.

  • Brack, A.: 1991, ‘Desarrollo y Medio Ambiente: El Caso Pacaya-Samiria', in: Manguare, Information Bulletin of Asociacion Amazonia.

  • CIPA: 1991, Document of the Inter-Ethnic Council, November (Mimeo).

  • CONAP: 1988, 1st and 2nd Congress, June and October (Mimeo).

  • Comision Multisectorial: 1988, Documento de la Comision Multisectorial Referida a los Aspectos del Impacto Social del Proyecto Gas del Camisea (Mimeo).

  • Dabbs, A. and Bateson, M.: 2002, ‘The corporate impact of addressing social issues: A financial case study of a project in Peru', Environ. Monit. Assess. 76(1), 135–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmeier, F. and Alonso, A. (eds.): 1997, Biodiversity Assessment and Long-term Monitoring of the Lower Urubamba Region in Peru: San Martin-3 and Cashiriari-2 Well Sites, SI/MAB Series #1, Smithsonian Institution/MAB Biodiversity Program, Washington, DC.

  • Durand, E., Camino, A., Tume, F. and Fernández-Dávila, P.: 1991, Economic, Social and Institutional Analyses for the PID of the Natural Resource Management Project Based on the Pacaya-Samiria National Reserve Area (Mimeo).

  • ERM: 1996, Camisea: Increasing Social Capital, London (Mimeo).

  • Evans, P.: 1997, Re-envisioning the Reform Process: A State-society Synergy Perspective, Paper presented to the ECLAC Conference, Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, (June).

  • Financial Times: 1995, Brent Spar: A strange affair, London (July).

  • Heinrich, J.: 1996, Market Incorporation, Agricultural Change and Sustainability among the Machiguenga Indians of the Peruvian Amazon, UNLA, Department of Anthropology (Mimeo).

  • Jones, M. G.: 1998, Environmental Impact Assessment within a Multi-national Enterprise: Adaptive EIA in the Camisea Project, Paper presented at the Conference on Impact Assessment in the Development Process, University of Manchester (October).

  • Kane, J.: 1995, Savages, Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimerling, J.: 1991, Amazon Crude, Natural Resource Defense Council, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, P., Dabbs, A., Fernandez, P., Vinha, V. and Zaidenweber, N.: 1999a, Corporate Roles and Rewards from Promoting Sustainable Development: Lessons Learned from Camisea, Working Paper ERG-99-1, Energy and Resources Group of the University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, P., Vinha, V. and Zaidenweber, N.: 1999b, ‘Royal Dutch/Shell', in: Hastings, M. (ed.), Corporate Incentives and Environmental Decision-making: A Case Studies and Workshop Report, Center for Global Studies, Houston Advanced Research Center, The Woodlands, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mora, C. and Zarzar, A.: 1997, Amazonia Peruana, Comunidades Indigenas, Conocimientos y Tierras Tituladas. Atlas y base de datos,GEF/PNUD/UNOPS, Lima.

  • Perupetro: 1988, Explotacion del Gas de Camisea, Investment brochure.

  • Perupetro/Shell: 1995, Camisea Feasibility Study, Lima (Mimeo).

  • Putnam, R. D.: 1993, Making Democracy Work, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shell: 1995, Consultation Strategy and Plan, Lima (Mimeo).

  • SPDP: 1996, Camisea and Block 75: Legacy from the Exploration Campaign 1981-1987 (January, Mimeo).

  • SV Partners Ltd: 1995, Camisea Consultation Sensing Survey, Rio de Janeiro (May, Mimeo).

  • Toonen, J.: 1996, Estudio Basico de Salud en la Zona de Camisea Bajo Urubamba, Peru, SPDP, Lima (Mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, B. N.: 1996, Societies Changing Expectations: Executive Report, Shell International, London (November, Mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yañez, C. and Tobin, B.: 1998, Oil Companies, the State and Indigenous Peoples: The Game of Expectations, Defensoria del Pueblo, Lima (Mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

May, P.H., Dabbs, A.W., Fernández-Dávila, P. et al. A Corporate Approach to Social Monitoring and Assessment for Development in a Fragile Environment. Environ Monit Assess 76, 125–134 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015277106171

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015277106171

Navigation