Skip to main content
Log in

Explaining the Acquisition of a Complex Skill: Methodological and Theoretical Considerations Uncovered in the Study of Simple Addition and the Moving-On Process

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research into the development of mathematical cognition has accelerated in recent times. In this literature review, findings from different approaches to studying simple addition performance are reviewed. A review of findings from studies incorporating observation, self-report or both revealed the complex process of change associated with developing retrieval strategies for simple addition. These findings are synthesized using a model of change labelled the Moving-On Process to represent the wave-like transitional pattern of strategy use preceding retrieval. A review of findings from studies based on the analysis of reaction times revealed a robust finding known as “the problem-size effect.” Different explanations of the problem-size effect, incorporating different theoretical accounts of the nature of retrieval, exact answers, and strategy choice, are compared and contrasted. A review of findings based on a combination of both approaches uncovered important methodological considerations associated with analyzing reaction times and offers direction for future research aimed at unravelling the convoluted construct of automaticity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ackerman, P. T., Anhalt, B. S., and Dykman, R. A. (1986). Arithmetic automatisation failure in children with attention and reading disorders: Associations and sequela. J. Learn. Disabil. 19: 222–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive Psychology and its Implications 3rd edn., Freeman, NewYork.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashcraft, M. H. (1982). The development of mental arithmetic:Achronometric approach. Dev. Rev. 2: 213–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashcraft, M. H. (1983). Procedural knowledge versus fact retrieval in mental arithmetic: A reply to Baroody. Dev. Rev. 3: 231–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashcraft, M. H. (1985). Is it far fetched that some of us remember our arithmetic facts? J. Res. Math. Edu. 16(2): 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashcraft, M. H. (1992). Cognitive Arithmetic: A Review of data and theory. Cognition 44: 75–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashcraft, M. H., and Battaglia, J. (1978). Is it farfetched that some of us remember our arithmetic facts. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Learn. Mem. 4: 527–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashcraft, M. H., and Fierman, B. A. (1982). Mental addition in third, fourth and sixth graders. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 33: 216–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashcraft, M. H., Fierman, B. A., and Bartolotta, R. (1984). The production and verification tasks in mental addition: An empirical comparison. Dev. Rev. 4: 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A. J. (1983). The development of procedural knowledge: An alternative explanation for chronometric trends of mental arithmetic. Dev. Rev. 3: 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A. J. (1984). A re-examination of mental arithmetic models and data: A reply to Ashcraft. Dev. Rev. 4: 148–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A. J. (1994). An evaluation of evidence supporting fact-retrieval models. Learn. Indiv. Differ. 6: 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A. J. (1995). The role of the number-after rule in the invention of computational shortcuts. Cognit. Instr. 13: 189–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A. J. (1999). The roles of estimation and the commutativity principle in the development of third graders' mental multiplication. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 74: 157–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A. J., and Ginsburg, H. P. (1986). The relationship between initial meaningful and mechanical knowledge or arithmetic. In Hiebert, J. (ed.), Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 75–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A. J., and Ginsburg, H. P. (1991). A cognitive approach to assessing the mathematical differences of children labelled learning disabled. In Swanson, H. L. (ed.), Handbook on the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: Theory, Research and Practice, Pro-ED, Austin, TX, pp. 177–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. I.D., and Clark, J. M. (1989). Time course of error priming in number fact retrieval: Evidence for excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 15(5): 920–929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. I. D., and Graham, D. J. (1985). Mental multiplication skill: Structure, process and acquisition. Can. J. Psychol. 39: 338–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. I. D., and Oliphant, M. (1992). Representation and retrieval of arithmetic facts: A network-interference model and simulation. In Campbell, J. I. D. (ed.), The Nature and Origins of Mathematical Skills, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. I. D., and Tarling, D. P. M. (1996). Retrieval processes in arithmetic production and verification. Mem. Cognit. 24: 156–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., and Moser, J. M. (1984). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three. J. Res. Math. Edu. 15: 179–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P. W. (1985). Restructuring versus automaticity: Alternative accounts of skill acquisition. Psychol. Rev. 92: 414–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, P. F., Reder, L. M., Staszewski, J. J., and Ritter, F. E. (1998). The strategy-specific nature of improvement: The power law applies by strategy within task. Psychol. Sci. 9: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1996). Piaget's legacy. Psychol. Sci. 7: 200–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuson, K. C. (1982). An analysis of the counting on solution procedure in addition. In Carpenter, T., Moser, J., and Romberg, T. (eds.), Addition and Subtraction: A Cognitive Perspective, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (1990). A componential analysis of early learning deficit in mathematics. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 49: 363–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (1996). The problem size effect in mental addition: Developmental and crossnational trends. Math. Cognit. 2: 63–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C., and Brown, S. C. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-ofprocessing differences in gifted, normal, and mathematically disabled children. Dev. Psychol. 27(3): 398–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C., Brown, S. C., and Samaranayake, V. A. (1991). Cognitive addition: A short longitudinal study of strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in normal and mathematically disabled children. Dev. Psychol. 27: 787–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C., Widaman, K. F., and Little, T. D. (1986). Cognitive addition and multiplication: Evidence for a single memory network. Mem. Cognit. 14: 478–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C., and Wiley, J. G. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-ofprocessing differences in young and elderly adults. Psychol. Aging 6: 474–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, S. R., Mertz, D. L., and Pellegrino, J. W. (1989). Individual differences in extended practice functions and solution strategies for basic addition facts. J. Edu. Psychol. 81: 481–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groen, G. J., and Parkman, J. M. (1972). A chronometric analysis of simple addition. Psychol. Rev. 79: 329–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groen, G., and Resnick, L.B. (1977). Can preschool children invent addition algorithms. J. Edu. Psychol. 69: 645–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, M. S., and Ashcraft, M. H. (1985). Simple and complex mental addition across development. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 40: 49–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, J. R., and Becker, L.D. (1988). Cognitive components of learning problems in arithmetic. Remed. Spec. Edu. 9: 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeFevre, J., Bisanz, J., and Mrkonjic, L. (1988). Cognitive arithmetic: Evidence for obligatory activation of arithmetic facts. Mem. Cognit. 16: 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeFevre, J., Sadesky, G. S., and Bisanz, J. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem size effect in adults. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 22: 216–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire, P., Barrett, S. E., Fayol, M., and Abdi, H. (1994). Automatic activation of addition and multiplication facts in elementary school children. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 57: 224–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychol. Rev. 95: 492–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K., Perlmutter, N., and Keating, D. (1984). Cognitive arithmetic comparison of operations. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. and Cognit. 10: 46–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. F., and Paredes, D. R. (1990). Starting to add worse: Effects of learning to multiply on children's addition. Cognition 37: 213–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H. E. (1998). The Psychology of Attention, Institute of Technology, Massachusettes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reder, L. M., and Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 18: 435–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. J. Exp. Psychol. 83(2): 274–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrager, J., and Siegler, R. S. (1998). SCADS: a model of children's strategy choices and strategy discoveries. Psychol. Sci. 9: 405(6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S. (1986). Unities across domains in children's strategy choices. In Perlmutter, M. (ed.), Perspectives for Intellectual Development: Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, Vol. 19, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S. (1987). The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children's addition. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 116: 250–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S. (1988a). Individual differences in strategy choices: Good students, no-so-good students and perfectionists. Child Dev. 59: 833–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S. (1988b). Strategy choices procedures and the development of multiplication skill. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 117: 258–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S. (1989). How domain-general and domain-specific knowledge interact to produce strategy choices. Merrill-Palmer Q. 35: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S. (1995). How does change occur: A microgenetic study of number conservation. Cognit. Psychol. 28: 225–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., and Jenkins, E. (1989). How Children Discover New Strategies, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., and Robinson, M. (1982). The development of numerical understandings. In Reese, H., and Lipsett, L. P. (eds.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Vol. 16, Academic Press, New York, pp. 241–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., and Shipley, C. (1995). Variation, selection and cognitive change. In Simon, T., and Halford, G. S. (eds.), Developing Cognitive Competence: New Approaches to Process Modelling, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 31–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., and Shrager, J. (1984). Strategy choices in addition and subtraction: How do children know what to do? In Sophian, C. (ed.), Origins Of Cognitive Skills, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 229–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenson, O. (1975). Analysis of time required by children for simple additions. Acta Psychol. 39: 289–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenson, O. (1985). Memory retrieval of answers of simple additions as reflected in response latencies. Acta Psychol. 59: 285–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenson, O., Hedenborg, M. L., and Lingman, L. (1976). On children's heuristics for solving additions. Scand. J. Edu. Res. 20: 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenson, O., and Sjoberg, K. (1981). Solving simple subtractions during the first three school years. J. Exp. Edu. 50: 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L. (1939). A comparative study of the difficulty of the 100 addition problems. J. Genet. Psychol. 54: 295–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zbrodoff, N. J. (1995). Why is 9+7 harder than 2+3? Strength and interference as explanations of the problem-size effect. Mem. Cognit. 23: 689–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zbrodoff, N. J., and Logan, G. D. (1986). On the autonomy of mental processes: A case study of arithmetic. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 115: 118–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zbrodoff, N. J., and Logan, G. D. (1990). On the relation between production and verification tasks in the psychology of simple arithmetic. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 16(1): 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hopkins, S.L., Lawson, M.J. Explaining the Acquisition of a Complex Skill: Methodological and Theoretical Considerations Uncovered in the Study of Simple Addition and the Moving-On Process. Educational Psychology Review 14, 121–154 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014629604663

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014629604663

Navigation