Abstract
Research into the development of mathematical cognition has accelerated in recent times. In this literature review, findings from different approaches to studying simple addition performance are reviewed. A review of findings from studies incorporating observation, self-report or both revealed the complex process of change associated with developing retrieval strategies for simple addition. These findings are synthesized using a model of change labelled the Moving-On Process to represent the wave-like transitional pattern of strategy use preceding retrieval. A review of findings from studies based on the analysis of reaction times revealed a robust finding known as “the problem-size effect.” Different explanations of the problem-size effect, incorporating different theoretical accounts of the nature of retrieval, exact answers, and strategy choice, are compared and contrasted. A review of findings based on a combination of both approaches uncovered important methodological considerations associated with analyzing reaction times and offers direction for future research aimed at unravelling the convoluted construct of automaticity.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ackerman, P. T., Anhalt, B. S., and Dykman, R. A. (1986). Arithmetic automatisation failure in children with attention and reading disorders: Associations and sequela. J. Learn. Disabil. 19: 222–232.
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive Psychology and its Implications 3rd edn., Freeman, NewYork.
Ashcraft, M. H. (1982). The development of mental arithmetic:Achronometric approach. Dev. Rev. 2: 213–236.
Ashcraft, M. H. (1983). Procedural knowledge versus fact retrieval in mental arithmetic: A reply to Baroody. Dev. Rev. 3: 231–235.
Ashcraft, M. H. (1985). Is it far fetched that some of us remember our arithmetic facts? J. Res. Math. Edu. 16(2): 99–105.
Ashcraft, M. H. (1992). Cognitive Arithmetic: A Review of data and theory. Cognition 44: 75–106.
Ashcraft, M. H., and Battaglia, J. (1978). Is it farfetched that some of us remember our arithmetic facts. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Learn. Mem. 4: 527–538.
Ashcraft, M. H., and Fierman, B. A. (1982). Mental addition in third, fourth and sixth graders. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 33: 216–234.
Ashcraft, M. H., Fierman, B. A., and Bartolotta, R. (1984). The production and verification tasks in mental addition: An empirical comparison. Dev. Rev. 4: 157–170.
Baroody, A. J. (1983). The development of procedural knowledge: An alternative explanation for chronometric trends of mental arithmetic. Dev. Rev. 3: 225–230.
Baroody, A. J. (1984). A re-examination of mental arithmetic models and data: A reply to Ashcraft. Dev. Rev. 4: 148–156.
Baroody, A. J. (1994). An evaluation of evidence supporting fact-retrieval models. Learn. Indiv. Differ. 6: 1–36.
Baroody, A. J. (1995). The role of the number-after rule in the invention of computational shortcuts. Cognit. Instr. 13: 189–219.
Baroody, A. J. (1999). The roles of estimation and the commutativity principle in the development of third graders' mental multiplication. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 74: 157–193.
Baroody, A. J., and Ginsburg, H. P. (1986). The relationship between initial meaningful and mechanical knowledge or arithmetic. In Hiebert, J. (ed.), Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 75–111.
Baroody, A. J., and Ginsburg, H. P. (1991). A cognitive approach to assessing the mathematical differences of children labelled learning disabled. In Swanson, H. L. (ed.), Handbook on the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: Theory, Research and Practice, Pro-ED, Austin, TX, pp. 177–227.
Campbell, J. I.D., and Clark, J. M. (1989). Time course of error priming in number fact retrieval: Evidence for excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 15(5): 920–929.
Campbell, J. I. D., and Graham, D. J. (1985). Mental multiplication skill: Structure, process and acquisition. Can. J. Psychol. 39: 338–366.
Campbell, J. I. D., and Oliphant, M. (1992). Representation and retrieval of arithmetic facts: A network-interference model and simulation. In Campbell, J. I. D. (ed.), The Nature and Origins of Mathematical Skills, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Campbell, J. I. D., and Tarling, D. P. M. (1996). Retrieval processes in arithmetic production and verification. Mem. Cognit. 24: 156–172.
Carpenter, T. P., and Moser, J. M. (1984). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three. J. Res. Math. Edu. 15: 179–202.
Cheng, P. W. (1985). Restructuring versus automaticity: Alternative accounts of skill acquisition. Psychol. Rev. 92: 414–423.
Delaney, P. F., Reder, L. M., Staszewski, J. J., and Ritter, F. E. (1998). The strategy-specific nature of improvement: The power law applies by strategy within task. Psychol. Sci. 9: 1–7.
Flavell, J. H. (1996). Piaget's legacy. Psychol. Sci. 7: 200–203.
Fuson, K. C. (1982). An analysis of the counting on solution procedure in addition. In Carpenter, T., Moser, J., and Romberg, T. (eds.), Addition and Subtraction: A Cognitive Perspective, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 67–81.
Geary, D. C. (1990). A componential analysis of early learning deficit in mathematics. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 49: 363–383.
Geary, D. C. (1996). The problem size effect in mental addition: Developmental and crossnational trends. Math. Cognit. 2: 63–93.
Geary, D. C., and Brown, S. C. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-ofprocessing differences in gifted, normal, and mathematically disabled children. Dev. Psychol. 27(3): 398–406.
Geary, D. C., Brown, S. C., and Samaranayake, V. A. (1991). Cognitive addition: A short longitudinal study of strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in normal and mathematically disabled children. Dev. Psychol. 27: 787–797.
Geary, D. C., Widaman, K. F., and Little, T. D. (1986). Cognitive addition and multiplication: Evidence for a single memory network. Mem. Cognit. 14: 478–487.
Geary, D. C., and Wiley, J. G. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-ofprocessing differences in young and elderly adults. Psychol. Aging 6: 474–483.
Goldman, S. R., Mertz, D. L., and Pellegrino, J. W. (1989). Individual differences in extended practice functions and solution strategies for basic addition facts. J. Edu. Psychol. 81: 481–496.
Groen, G. J., and Parkman, J. M. (1972). A chronometric analysis of simple addition. Psychol. Rev. 79: 329–343.
Groen, G., and Resnick, L.B. (1977). Can preschool children invent addition algorithms. J. Edu. Psychol. 69: 645–652.
Hamann, M. S., and Ashcraft, M. H. (1985). Simple and complex mental addition across development. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 40: 49–72.
Kirby, J. R., and Becker, L.D. (1988). Cognitive components of learning problems in arithmetic. Remed. Spec. Edu. 9: 7–15.
LeFevre, J., Bisanz, J., and Mrkonjic, L. (1988). Cognitive arithmetic: Evidence for obligatory activation of arithmetic facts. Mem. Cognit. 16: 45–53.
LeFevre, J., Sadesky, G. S., and Bisanz, J. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem size effect in adults. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 22: 216–230.
Lemaire, P., Barrett, S. E., Fayol, M., and Abdi, H. (1994). Automatic activation of addition and multiplication facts in elementary school children. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 57: 224–258.
Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychol. Rev. 95: 492–527.
Miller, K., Perlmutter, N., and Keating, D. (1984). Cognitive arithmetic comparison of operations. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. and Cognit. 10: 46–60.
Miller, K. F., and Paredes, D. R. (1990). Starting to add worse: Effects of learning to multiply on children's addition. Cognition 37: 213–242.
Pashler, H. E. (1998). The Psychology of Attention, Institute of Technology, Massachusettes.
Reder, L. M., and Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 18: 435–451.
Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. J. Exp. Psychol. 83(2): 274–278.
Shrager, J., and Siegler, R. S. (1998). SCADS: a model of children's strategy choices and strategy discoveries. Psychol. Sci. 9: 405(6).
Siegler, R. S. (1986). Unities across domains in children's strategy choices. In Perlmutter, M. (ed.), Perspectives for Intellectual Development: Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, Vol. 19, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 1–48.
Siegler, R. S. (1987). The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children's addition. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 116: 250–264.
Siegler, R. S. (1988a). Individual differences in strategy choices: Good students, no-so-good students and perfectionists. Child Dev. 59: 833–851.
Siegler, R. S. (1988b). Strategy choices procedures and the development of multiplication skill. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 117: 258–275.
Siegler, R. S. (1989). How domain-general and domain-specific knowledge interact to produce strategy choices. Merrill-Palmer Q. 35: 1–26.
Siegler, R. S. (1995). How does change occur: A microgenetic study of number conservation. Cognit. Psychol. 28: 225–273.
Siegler, R. S., and Jenkins, E. (1989). How Children Discover New Strategies, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Siegler, R. S., and Robinson, M. (1982). The development of numerical understandings. In Reese, H., and Lipsett, L. P. (eds.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Vol. 16, Academic Press, New York, pp. 241–312.
Siegler, R. S., and Shipley, C. (1995). Variation, selection and cognitive change. In Simon, T., and Halford, G. S. (eds.), Developing Cognitive Competence: New Approaches to Process Modelling, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 31–76.
Siegler, R. S., and Shrager, J. (1984). Strategy choices in addition and subtraction: How do children know what to do? In Sophian, C. (ed.), Origins Of Cognitive Skills, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 229–293.
Svenson, O. (1975). Analysis of time required by children for simple additions. Acta Psychol. 39: 289–302.
Svenson, O. (1985). Memory retrieval of answers of simple additions as reflected in response latencies. Acta Psychol. 59: 285–304.
Svenson, O., Hedenborg, M. L., and Lingman, L. (1976). On children's heuristics for solving additions. Scand. J. Edu. Res. 20: 161–173.
Svenson, O., and Sjoberg, K. (1981). Solving simple subtractions during the first three school years. J. Exp. Edu. 50: 91–100.
Wheeler, L. (1939). A comparative study of the difficulty of the 100 addition problems. J. Genet. Psychol. 54: 295–312.
Zbrodoff, N. J. (1995). Why is 9+7 harder than 2+3? Strength and interference as explanations of the problem-size effect. Mem. Cognit. 23: 689–700.
Zbrodoff, N. J., and Logan, G. D. (1986). On the autonomy of mental processes: A case study of arithmetic. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 115: 118–130.
Zbrodoff, N. J., and Logan, G. D. (1990). On the relation between production and verification tasks in the psychology of simple arithmetic. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 16(1): 83–97.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hopkins, S.L., Lawson, M.J. Explaining the Acquisition of a Complex Skill: Methodological and Theoretical Considerations Uncovered in the Study of Simple Addition and the Moving-On Process. Educational Psychology Review 14, 121–154 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014629604663
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014629604663