Abstract
Respect for autonomy is a powerful tool for managing complexity. It lets natural, mutually supportive order emerge. In Western culture, though, much order is imposed. This causes conflict, which only increases complexity. This conflictual pattern has an antidote in systems practice: the systemic action–learning cycle. When used reflectively at the level of second-order cybernetics, this cycle embodies respect for autonomy. The UK Open University course "T306: Managing Complexity—A Systems Approach" teaches this action–learning cycle, and uses the cycle in its own teaching. In particular, it uses the cycle in its online conferences, to invite participation and dissolve conflict. This paper shows how.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Cox, E. S., Clark, W., Heath, H., and Plumpton B. (2000). Herding cats through Piccadilly Circus: The critical role of the tutor in the student's online conferencing experience. Report No. 256, Centre for Information Technology in Education, Institute of Educational Technology, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
Feenberg, A. (1989). The written world: On the theory and practice of computer conferencing. In Mason, R., and Kaye, A. (eds.), Mindweave: Communication, Computers and Distance Education, Pergamon Press, Oxford New York, pp. 22-39.
Gordon, T. (1974). Teacher Effectiveness Training, Wyden, New York.
Houston, G. (1995). The Now Red Book of Gestalt, 3rd ed., G. Houston, London.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Nolan, V. (1987). Communication, Sphere Reference Books, London.
Open University (2000). T306: Managing Complexity—A Systems Approach, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
Rogers, C. (1962). The interpersonal relationship: The core of guidance. In Stewart, J. (ed.), Bridges Not Walls: A Book About Interpersonal Communication, Addison-Wesley, London, 1977, pp. 240-248. [Reprinted from Harvard Educ. Rev. 32(Fall), 416–429.]
Rosenberg, M. (1999). Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Compassion, PuddleDancer Press, Del Mar, CA.
Weick, K. E. (1996). Sensemaking in Organizations, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Zimmer, B., and Alexander, G. (2000). Using Carl Rogers' communication principles to facilitate mutually supported learning online. Proceedings of the Online Tutoring Skills (OTiS)online conference, Heriot-Watt & Robert Gordon Universities, May (available online at http://otis.scotcit.ac.uk/casestudy/alphacs.htm).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zimmer, B. Practicing What We Teach in Teaching Systems Practice: The Action–Learning Cycle. Systemic Practice and Action Research 14, 697–713 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013126311580
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013126311580