Skip to main content
Log in

The Samaritan's Dilemma and the Effectiveness of Development Aid

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contributing to the alleviation of poverty in recipient countries is one of the main goals of most aid organizations. In this paper the following question is asked: could it be the case that altruistic aid organizations are counter-productive in the sense that their activities may cause the extent of poverty to increase or the relative income distribution to worsen? The answer is yes and the reason is simply that recipient governments adjust in order to qualify for aid. It is shown that if recipient governments perceive themselves as being engaged in a competition for aid and/or if the aggregate aid budget is endogenous, then the incentive problems may become particularly severe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boone, P. (1996). “Politics and the Effectiveness of Foreign Aid.” European Economic Review 40, 289–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. (1975). “The Samaritan's Dilemma.” In E. Phelps (ed.), Altruism, Morality and Economic Theory. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassen, R. et al. (1994). Does Aid Work? Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. (1997). “The Failure of Conditionality.” In C. Gwin and J. Nelson (eds.), Perspectives on Aid and Development. Washington: Overseas Development Counsil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. and B. Nalebuff. (1991). Thinking Strategically. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Development Studies Bulletin. (1986). Special issue on Aid Effectiveness.

  • Journal of International Development. (1992). Special issue on Economic Analysis of Aid Policy.

  • Kemp, M. (1992). “The Static Welfare Effects of Foreign Aid.” In D. Savoie and I. Brecher (eds.), Equity and Efficiency in Economic Development. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A., C. Michalopoulos, V. Ruttan (eds.). (1989). Aid and Development. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindbeck, A. and J. Weibull. (1988). “Altruism and Time Consistency: The Economics of Fait Accompli.” Journal of Political Economy 96(6), 1165–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maizels, A. and M. Nissanke. (1984). “Motivations for Aid to Developing Countries.” World Development 12, 879–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, K. (1996). “Aid, Investment and Incentives.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 98, 423–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, K. (1997). “Incentives and Aid Dependence.” Mimeograph Series 1997/1. Expert Group on Development Issues. Stockholm: Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, H. (1965). “External Aid: For Plans or Projects?” Economic Journal 75, 539–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L. and H. van der Tak. (1976). Economic Analysis of Projects. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumball, W. and H. Wall. (1994). “Estimating Aid-Allocating Criteria with Panel Data.” Economic Journal 104, 876–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1998). Assessing Aid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pedersen, K.R. The Samaritan's Dilemma and the Effectiveness of Development Aid. International Tax and Public Finance 8, 693–703 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012839126094

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012839126094

Navigation