Abstract
This study analyses the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis (EKC) with direct material flow data from the USA, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands and Finland in the years 1975 to 1994. Recently, there has been a discussion concerning the relevance of the EKC hypothesis suggesting that also the intensity of material use should decline with income growth. The EKC hypothesis has not been widely tested with direct material flow data, and this paper presents one of the first attempts to do such tests. The results of the empirical hypothesis tests indicate that the EKC hypothesis does not hold in the case of aggregated direct material flows among industrialised countries like Germany, Japan, the USA, the Netherlands and Finland.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adriaanse, A., Bringezu, S. Hammond, A., Moriguchi, Y., Rodenburg, E., Rogich, D. & Schutz, H. (1997). Resource Flows: The Material Basis of Industrialised Economies. World Resources Institute. USA. Wuppertal Institute. Germany. Netherlands Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment. Netherlands and National Institute for Economic Studies. Japan. Printed in USA.
Agras, J. & Chapman, D. (1999). A dynamic approach to the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. Ecological Economics 28(2), 267–277.
Ayres, R. (1998). Technology, Energy and Materials. Rotterdam: OCFEB. Erasmus University. Research Centre for Economic Policy. Research Memorandum 9804.
De Bruyn, S. M., van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. & Opschoor, J.B. (1998). Economic growth and emissions: reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves. Ecological Economics 25(2), 161–175.
De Groot, H.L.F. (1999). Structural Change, Economic Growth and the Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Theoretical Perspective. Rotterdam: OCFEB. Erasmus University. Research Centre for Economic Policy. Research Memorandum 9911.
Dijkgraaf, E. & Volleberg, H.R.J. (1998). Environmental Kuznets revisited. Time-series versus panel estimation: The CO2 case. Rotterdam: OCFEB. Erasmus University. Research Centre for Economic Policy. Research Memorandum 9806.
Ekins, P. (1997). The Kuznets Curve for the Environment and Economic Growth: Examining the Evidence. Environment and Planning A 29, 805–830.
Femia, A., Hinterberger, F. & Renn, S. (1999). Economic Growth with less Material Input? Decomposing the Empirical Trend of De-linking. Paper prepared for the Symposium “Energetic an Material Metabolism” at the Conference on “Nature, Society and History—Long Term Dynamics of Social Metabolism” Vienna, September 30–October 2, 1999.
Grossman, G. & Krueger, A. (1992). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. Princeton,NJ: Woodrow Wilson School.
Grossman, G. M. & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 353–378.
Hettige, H., Mani, M. & Wheeler, D. (1997). Industrial pollution in economic development: Kuznets revisited. Washington: World Bank. Development Research Group. December 1997.
Hoffre´n, J. (1999). Measuring the Eco-efficiency of the Finnish Economy. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
Holtz-Eakin, D. & Selden, T. M. (1995). Stoking the fires? CO2 emission and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics 57, 85–101.
Jokinen, P., Malaska, P. & Kaivo-oja, J. (1998). Environment in an “information society”: transition stage towards sustainable development? Futures 30(6), 485–498.
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review 49, 1–28.
Munasinghe, M. (1995). Making economic growth more sustainable. Ecological Economics 15, 121–124.
Munasinghe, M. (1996). An Overview of the Environmental Impacts of Macroeconomic and Sectoral Policies. In: M. Munasinghe (Ed.), Environmental Impacts of Macroeconomic and Sectoral Policies, pp. 1–14. Washington, DC: The International Society for Ecological Economics (ISEE), the World Bank and the United Nations Environment Programme.
Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development. Working Paper WP 238. Technology and Environment Programme. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Roberts, J.T. & Grimes, P.E. (1997). Carbon intensity and economic development 1962–1991: A brief exploration of the Environmental Kuznets curve. World Development 25, 191–198.
Rock, M.T. (2000). The dewatering of economic growth. What accounts for the declining water-use intensity of income? Journal of Industrial Ecology 4(1), 57–73.
Rothman, D.S. & de Bruyn, S.M. (1998). Probing into the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Ecological Economics 25, 143–145.
Selden, T.M. & Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27, 147–162.
Shafik, N. & Bandyopadhyay, S. (1992). Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Timeseries and Cross-Country Evidence. Background Paper for World Development Report 1992. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Stern, D.I. (1998). Progress on the Environmental Kuznets Curve? Manuscript January 1998. Canberra, Australia: Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies. The Australian National University.
Stern, D.I., Common, M.S. & Barbier, E.B. (1996). Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Development 24, 1151–1160. Summers-Heston data. Internet address: http://hicks.nuff.ox.ac.uk/Economics/Growth/summers. htm.
Suri, V. & Chapman, D. (1998). Economic growth, trade and energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics 25(2), 195–208.
Tucker, M. (1995). Carbon dioxide emissions and global GDP. Ecological Economics 15(3), 215–223.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seppälä, T., Haukioja, T. & Kaivo-oja, J. The EKC Hypothesis Does Not Hold for Direct Material Flows: Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis Tests for Direct Material Flows in Five Industrial Countries. Population and Environment 23, 217–238 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012831804794
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012831804794