Skip to main content
Log in

In a Violent World a Just World Makes Sense: The Case of “Senseless Violence” in The Netherlands

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent violent incidents in The Netherlands caused nationwide debates about their purported senselessness. Building on Lerner's Just World Theory (Lerner, 1980, The Belief in a Just World. A Fundamental Delusion, Plenum Press, New York), the present experiment sought to delineate the circumstances under which violence is perceived as senseless by outside observers. Participants were more likely to perceive an act of violence as senseless and to identify with the victim when there was no opportunity to blame the victim and when the victim was uninvolved with the perpetrator. These findings suggest that acts of violence are perceived as senseless when attributional strategies fail to uphold observers' belief in a just world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aderman, D., Brehm, D., and Katz, L. B. (1974). Empathetic observation of an innocent victim: The just world revisited. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 29: 342–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1992).An attributional and value analysis of deservingness in success and failure. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 31: 125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, D. J., and Slugoski, B. R. (1986). Knowledge-based causal attributions: The abnormal condition focus model. Psychol. Rev. 93: 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, H. A. (1976). Cruelty and Kindness, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. Am. Psychol. 28: 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1966). The unjust consequences of the need to believe in a just world. Paper Presented at the Meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, September 1966.

  • Lerner, M. J. (1970). The desire for justice and reactions to victims. In Macaulay, J., and Berkowitz, L. (eds.), Altruism and Helping Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 205–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1980). The Belief in a Just World. A Fundamental Delusion, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1998). The two forms of belief in a just world: Some thoughts on why and how people care about justice. In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Responses to Victimizations and Belief in a Just World, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 247–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., Miller, D. T., and Holmes, J. G. (1976). Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In Berkowitz, L., and Walster, E. (eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 9, pp. 133–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., and Montada, L. (1998). An overview: Advances in belief in a just world theory and methods. In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Responses to Victimizations and Belief in a Just World, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., and Simmons, C. H. (1966). Observer's reaction to the ‘innocent victim.' J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 4: 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupfer, M. B., and Gingrich, B. E. (1999). When bad (good) things happen to (good) bad people: The impact of character appraisal and perceived controllability on judgements of deservingness. Soc. Just. Res. 12 (3): 165–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohiyeddini, C., and Montada, L. (1998).BJWand self-efficacy in coping with observed victimization: Results from a study about unemployment. In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Responses to Victimizations and Belief in a Just World, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L. (1998). Belief in a just world: A hybrid of justice motive and self-interest? In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (eds.), Responses to Victimizations and Belief in a Just World, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 217–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L., and Lerner, M. J. (1998). Responses to Victimizations and Belief in a Just World, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklar, J. N. (1990). The Faces of Injustice, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, C. W., and Piliavin, J. A. (1972). The effect of deception on reaction to a victim. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 21: 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D., and Schopler, J. (1973). Reactions to victims under conditions of situational detachment: The effects of responsibility, severity, and expected future interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 25: 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985). 'spontaneous’ causal thinking. Psychol. Bull. 97: 74–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 2nd edn, McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrightsman, L. S. (1972). Social Psychology in the Seventies, Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hein F. M. Lodewijkx.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lodewijkx, H.F.M., Wildschut, T., Nijstad, B.A. et al. In a Violent World a Just World Makes Sense: The Case of “Senseless Violence” in The Netherlands. Social Justice Research 14, 79–94 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012527808620

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012527808620

Navigation