Skip to main content
Log in

Components of instruction toward a theoretical tool for instructional design

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article defines primary knowledgecomponents for entities, actions, andprocesses. It also defines primaryinstructional strategy components. It proposesthat a different combination of strategy andknowledge components is required for differentkinds of instructional goals. It furtherproposes that if these fundamentalstrategy-knowledge component combinations arenot present that there will be a decrement inthe student's effective and efficientacquisition of the desired knowledge and skill.It further proposes that the underlyingarchitecture of an instructional strategy is acombination of primary strategy components andprimary knowledge components appropriate for,and consistent with, a given instructionalgoal. Instructional components are a theoreticaltool. They are not a method or developmentprocedure. These instructional strategy andknowledge components can be imbedded in a widevariety of different instructionalarchitectures based on a variety of differentphilosophical orientations. It is hoped thatone of the primary benefits of instructionalcomponents is to provide a common vocabularythat will enable designers, theorists, andinstructional developers to more clearlydescribe their products and procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clark, R.C. (1998). Building Expertise: Cognitive Methods for Training and Performance Improvement. Washington, DC: International Society for Performance and Instruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, S. (1997). The integration of instructional systems design models and constructivistic design principles. Instructional Science 25: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, L., Mills, R., Lawless, K., Curry, J. & Merrill, M.D. (1998). The role of explanations in learning environments. Paper presented at 1998 Annual Meetings of American Educational Research Association, San Diego.

  • Gagné, R.M. (1965, 1985). The Conditions of Learning (1st Ed., 4th Ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C.M. Reigeluth, ed., Instructional Design Theories and Models Volume II. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, K., Mills, R., Drake, L. & Merrill, M.D. (1998). The role of learner control for learning procedures. Paper presented at 1998 Annual Meetings of American Educational Research Association, San Diego.

  • Merrill, M.D. (1994). Instructional Design Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M.D. (1998). Knowledge objects. CBT Solutions, March/April: 1–11.

  • Merrill, M.D. (1999). Instructional Transaction Theory (ITT): Instructional design based on knowledge objects. In C.M. Reigeluth, ed., Instructional Design Theories and Models, Volume II. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M.D. (2000). Knowledge objects and mental models. D.A. Wiley, The Instructional Use of Learning Objects. AECT (On-line version at htttp://reusability.org/read.)

  • Merrill, M.D., Li, Z. & Jones, M.K. (1990). Second generation instructional design (ID2). Educational Technology 30(2): 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M.D., Tennyson, R.D. & Posey, L.O. (1992). Teaching Concepts: An Instructional Design Guide (2nd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M.D. & ID2 Research Group (1996). Instructional Transaction Theory: Instructional design based on knowledge objects. Educational Technology 36(3): 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M.D. & Thompson, B.M. (1999). The IDXelerator: Learning-centered instructional design. In J. v.d. Akker, R.M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen and T. Plomp, eds., Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R.C., Berman, T.R. & Macpherson, K.A. (1999). Learning by doing. In C.M. Reigeluth, ed., Instructional Design Theories and Models Volume II. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennyson, R.D. & Cocchiarella, M.J. (1986). An empirically based instructional design theory for concept teaching. Review of Educational Research 36: 40–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincenti, W.G. (1980). What Engineers Know and How they Know It. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (1998). Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merrill, M.D. Components of instruction toward a theoretical tool for instructional design. Instructional Science 29, 291–310 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011943808888

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011943808888

Navigation