Skip to main content
Log in

Deriving an Empirical Development Taxonomy for Manufacturing SMEs Using Data from Australia's Business Longitudinal Survey

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This novel methodological paper describes the first stage of an on-going research effort to derive, characterise and employ an empirically-based development taxonomy for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector using panel data recently made available from Australia's Business Longitudinal Survey. Exploratory cluster analysis is used with key enterprise age, size and growth variables to discover if there appear to be any stable development pathways evident in the data. Each of four annual data collections is separately examined, and then comparisons are made of the resulting cluster analysis outcomes over time. Descriptive statistics for various enterprise characteristics facilitate interpretation of the cluster analysis solutions. Using the clusters as markers or signposts over time, three relatively stable SME development pathways are discernible in the longitudinal panel results. The first is a low growth pathway apparently leading to the traditional or life-style SME configuration (around 70 per cent of the panel). The second is a moderate growth pathway possibly leading to the capped growth SME configuration (around 25 per cent of the panel). And the third is a high growth pathway seemingly leading to the entrepreneurial SME configuration (around 5 per cent of the panel). These findings are clearly in accord with the observed rarity of substantial growth amongst SMEs world-wide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1996, Small Business in Australia 1995, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, J. and M. Godwin, 1994, 'Incorporating the Micro Business: Perceptions and Misperceptions', in A. Hughes and D. J. Storey (eds.), Finance and the Small Firm, London, U.K.: Routledge, pp. 232-283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C., 1992, 'Growth Orientation and the Small Firm', in K. Caley, E. Chell, F. Chittenden and L. Mason (eds.), Small Enterprise Development, London, U.K.: Paul Chapman Publishing, pp. 59-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham and W. C. Black, 1995, Multivariate Data Analysis, 4th edn., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakim, C., 1989, 'Identifying Fast Growth Small Firms', Employment Gazette 97(1), 29-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, S. H., C. J. Watson, E. Jansen and G. N. Chandler, 1993, 'Tightening the Life-cycle Construct: A Taxonomic Study of Growth Stage Configurations in High-technology Organizations', Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 18(2), 5-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A. and D. J. Storey, 1994, 'Introduction: Financing Small Firms', in A. Hughes and D. J. Storey (eds.), Finance and the Small Firm, London, U.K.: Routledge, pp. 1-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazanjian, R. K., 1988, 'Relation of Dominant Problems to Stages of Growth in Technology-based New Ventures', Academy of Management Journal 31(2), 257-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazanjian, R. K. and R. Drazin, 1989, 'An Empirical Test of Stage of Growth Progression Model', Management Science 35(12), 1489-1503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazanjian, R. K. and R. Drazin, 1990, 'A Stage-contingent Model of Design and Growth for Technology Based Ventures', Journal of Business Venturing 5(3), 137-150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, J. R. and R.H. Miles, 1980, 'Preface', in J. R. Kimberly, R. H. Miles and Associates (eds.), The Organizational Life Cycle: Issues in the Creation, Transformation, and Decline of Organizations, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. ix-xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A., 1890, Principles of Economics, London, U.K.: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, R. G. P., 1998, 'Stage Models of SME Growth Reconsidered', Small Enterprise Research: The Journal of SEAANZ 6(2), 20-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, R. G. P., 1999, 'Recent SME Research: A Critical Review', Small Enterprise Research: The Journal of SEAANZ 7(1), 68-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, R. G. P., S. Holmes, P. J. Hutchinson and D. M. Forsaith, 1993, Small Enterprise Financial Management: Theory and Practice, Sydney: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. and P. H. Friesen, 1984, 'A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate life Cycle', Management Science 30(10), 1161-1183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norusis, M. J. and SPSS Inc., 1992, SPSS for Windows Professional Statistics, Release 5.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Farrell, P. N. and D. M. W. N. Hitchens, 1988, 'Alternative Theories of Small-firm Growth: A Critical Review', Environment and Planning A 20(2), 1365-1383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, Carter, Evans and Koop/Telesis, 1990, The Global Challenge: Australian Manufacturing in the 1990s, Melbourne, Victoria: Australian Manufacturing Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T., 1952, 'Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm', American Economic Review 42(5), 804-819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T., 1959, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, New York, NY: John Wiley and Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostow, W. W., 1960, The Stages of Economic Growth, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. G., T. R. Mitchell and C. E. Summer, 1985, 'Top Level Management Priorities in Different Stages of the Organizational Life Cycle', Academy of Management Journal 28(4), 799-820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, L. L., 1969, 'Critical Stages of Small Business Growth: When They Occur and How to Survive Them', Business Horizons 12(1), 29-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yellow Pages Australia, 1995, A Special Report on Small Business Growth Aspirations and the Role of Exports, Melbourne, Victoria: Small Business Index.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McMahon, R.G.P. Deriving an Empirical Development Taxonomy for Manufacturing SMEs Using Data from Australia's Business Longitudinal Survey. Small Business Economics 17, 197–212 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011885622783

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011885622783

Keywords

Navigation