Abstract
Species diversity of vascular epiphyte plant communities was studied in La Carbonera, a montane rain forest dominated by Podocarpaceae in the Venezuelan Andes. We compared the epiphyte communities of the primary, disturbed, and secondary forest areas of La Carbonera in order to augment the scarce knowledge on the effects of anthropogenic disturbance on these important elements of tropical vegetation. Diversity of vascular epiphytes (191 species in the whole forest area) was low in the disturbed and secondary areas (81 spp.) compared to adjacent primary forest (178 spp.). Four types of disturbed forest and secondary vegetation supported different numbers of epiphyte species, showing a decline with increasing degrees of disturbance (65 spp. along a road transect, 42 spp. on relict trees in disturbed forest, 13 spp. in a tree plantation and 7 spp. in a former clearing, both secondary vegetation units). Epiphytic species composition in primary and disturbed or secondary forest areas differed markedly: disturbed habitats harboured fewer fern and orchid species but more bromeliad species than the primary forest. Probably the families occurring only in primary forest sites of our study may be useful as bioindicators to determine the degree of disturbance in other habitats of mountain rain forests as well. Epiphyte abundance was also lower in disturbed habitats: a remnant emergent tree supported only about half as many epiphyte individuals as a member of the same species of similar size in the primary forest. The decrease in species numbers and abundance as well as the differences in species composition are mainly due to the less diverse phorophyte structure and less differentiated microclimate in the disturbed and secondary vegetation compared to the primary forest.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrade, J. L. & Nobel, P. S. 1997. Microhabitats and water relations of epiphytic cacti and ferns in lowland neotropical forest. Biotropica29: 261-270.
Bennett, B. C. 1992. Uses of epiphytes, lianas, and parasites by the Shuae People of Amazonian Ecuador. Selbyana13: 99-114.
Benzing, D. H. 1984. Epiphytic vegetation: A profile and suggestions for future inquiries. Pp. 155-171. In: Medina, E., Mooney, H. A. & Vásquez-Yánes, C. (eds), Physiological ecology of plants in the wet tropics. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.
Benzing, D. H. 1990. Vascular epiphytes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Benzing, D. H. 1995. The physical mosaic and plant variety in forest canopies. Selbyana16: 159-168.
Brun, R. 1979. Methods and results of biomass determination in a cloud forest ecosystem in the Venezuelan Andes. Plant Res. Devel. 9: 61-70.
Chazdon, R. L. 1994. The primary importance of secondary forests in the tropics. Tropinet5: 1.
Edwards, P. J. & Grubb, P. J. 1977. Studies of mineral cycling in a montane rain forest in New Guinea. I. The distribution of organic matter in the vegetation and soil. J. Ecol. 65: 943-969.
Engwald, S. 1999. Diversität und Ökologie der vaskulären Epiphyten in einem Berg-und einem Tieflandregenwald in Venezuela. Libri-Books on Demand, Hamburg.
Gentry, A. H. & Dodson, C. H. 1987a. Diversity and biogeography of neotropical vascular epiphytes. Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden 74: 205-233.
Gentry, A. H. & Dodson, C. H. 1987b: Contribution of nontrees to species richness of a tropical rain forest. Biotropica19 (2): 149-156.
Hall, J. B. 1978. Check-list of the vascular plants of Bia National Park and Bia Game Production Reserve. In: Martin, C. (ed.), Management plan for the Bia Wildlife Conservation Areas, Part I.Wildlife and National Parks Division, Ghana Forestry Commission. Final Report IUCN/WWF Project 1251.
Hetsch, W. & Hoheisel, H. 1976. DeStandorts-und Vegetationstypengliederung in einem tropischen Nebelwald. Allgemeine Forst-und Jagdzeitung 147: 10-11.
Hietz-Seifert, U., Hietz, P. & Guevara, S. 1996. Epiphyte vegetation and diversity on remnant trees after forest clearance in southern Veracruz. Biol. Cons. 75: 103-111.
Ibisch, P. 1996. Neotropische Epiphytendiversität-das Beispiel Bolivien. Archiv naturwissenschaftlicher Dissertationen. Martina Galunder-Verlag, Wiehl.
Ibisch, P. I., Boegner, A., Nieder, J. & Barthlott, W. 1996. How diverse are neotropical epiphytes? An analysis based on the ‘Catalogue of the Flowering Plants and Gymnosperms of Peru’. Ecotropica2: 13-28.
Johansson, D. 1974. Ecology of vascular epiphytes in West African rain forest. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 59: 1-136.
Lugo, A. E. & Scatena, F. N. 1992. Epiphytes and climate change research in the Caribbean: a proposal. Selbyana 13: 123-130.
Magurran, A. E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Chapman and Hall, London, New York, Tokyo, Melbourne, Madras.
Nadkarni, N. M. 1985. Epiphyte biomass and nutrient capital of a neotropical elfin forest. Biotropica16(4): 249-256.
Nadkarni, N. M. 1992. The conservation of epiphytes and their habitats: Summary of a discussion at the international symposium on the biology and conservation of epiphytes. Selbyana13: 140-142.
Olmsted, I. & Gómez Juárez, M. 1995. Distribution and conservation of epiphytes on the Yucatán Peninsula. Selbyana17: 58-70.
Perry, D. R. 1978. A method of access into the crowns of emergent and canopy trees. Biotropica10: 155-157.
Pittendrigh, C. S. 1948. The bromeliad-Anopheles-malaria complex in Trinidad. I. The bromeliad flora. Evolution 2: 58-89.
Porembski, S. & Barthlott, W. 2000. Biodiversity research in Botany. Prog. Bot. 21: 335-362.
Rauh, W. 1992. Are Tillandsias endangered plants? Selbyana13: 138-139.
Richter, M. 1991. FrMethoden der Klimaindikation durch pflanzenmorphologische Merkmale in den Kordilleren der Neotropis. Die Erde 122 (4): 267-289.
Sanford, W. W. 1968. Distribution of epiphytic orchids in semideciduous tropical forest in southern Nigeria. J. Ecol. 56: 697-705.
Schimper, A. F. W. 1888. Die epiphytische Vegetation Amerikas. G.Fischer, Jena.
Smith, J. A. C. 1986. Comparative ecophysiology of crassulacean acid metabolism and 3-carbon pathway bromeliads. 4. Plant water relations. Plant, Cell Environ.9: 395-410.
Smith, J. A. C., Griffiths, H., Bassett, M. & Griffiths, N. M. 1985. Day-night changes in the leaf water relations of epiphytic bromeliads in the rain forests of Trinidad. Oecologia67: 475-485.
Turner, I. M., Tan, H. T. W., Wee, Y. C., Ibrahim, A. B., Chew, P. T. & Corlett, R. T. 1994. A study of plant species extinction in Singapore: Lessons for the conservation of tropical biodiversity. Cons. Biol. 8(3): 705-712.
Went, F. W. 1940. FrSoziologie der Epiphyten eines tropischen Urwaldes. Ann. Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg 50: 1-98.
Whitmore, T. C. 1990. An introduction to tropical rain forests. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Zotz, G. 1995. How fast does an epiphyte grow? Selbyana 16: 150-154.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barthlott, W., Schmit-Neuerburg, V., Nieder, J. et al. Diversity and abundance of vascular epiphytes: a comparison of secondary vegetation and primary montane rain forest in the Venezuelan Andes. Plant Ecology 152, 145–156 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011483901452
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011483901452