Abstract
We are interested in estimating the fraction of a population that possesses a certain trait, such as the presence of a chemical contaminant in a lake. A composite sample drawn from a population has the trait in question whenever one or more of the individual samples making up the composite has the trait. Let the true fraction of the population that is contaminated be p. Classical estimators of p, such as the MLE and the jackknife, have been shown to be biased. In this study, we introduce a new shrinking estimator which can be used when doing composite sampling. The properties of this estimator are investigated and compared with those of the MLE and the jackknife.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burrows, P.M. (1987) Improved estimation of pathogen transmission rates by group testing. Phytopathology, 77(2), 363-65.
Dorfman, R. (1943) The detection of defective members of large populations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 14, 436-40.
Efron, B.E. (1982) The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.
Johnson N.L. and Kotz, S. (1969) Distributions in Statistics: Discrete Distributions, Wiley, New York.
Rhode, C.A. (1976) Composite Sampling. Biometrics, 32, 273-82.
Wolfram, S. (1990) Mathematica, Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Colón, S., Patil, G.P. & Taillie, C. Estimating prevalence using composites. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 8, 213–236 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011387523306
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011387523306