Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating prevalence using composites

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We are interested in estimating the fraction of a population that possesses a certain trait, such as the presence of a chemical contaminant in a lake. A composite sample drawn from a population has the trait in question whenever one or more of the individual samples making up the composite has the trait. Let the true fraction of the population that is contaminated be p. Classical estimators of p, such as the MLE and the jackknife, have been shown to be biased. In this study, we introduce a new shrinking estimator which can be used when doing composite sampling. The properties of this estimator are investigated and compared with those of the MLE and the jackknife.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burrows, P.M. (1987) Improved estimation of pathogen transmission rates by group testing. Phytopathology, 77(2), 363-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, R. (1943) The detection of defective members of large populations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 14, 436-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B.E. (1982) The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson N.L. and Kotz, S. (1969) Distributions in Statistics: Discrete Distributions, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhode, C.A. (1976) Composite Sampling. Biometrics, 32, 273-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, S. (1990) Mathematica, Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colón, S., Patil, G.P. & Taillie, C. Estimating prevalence using composites. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 8, 213–236 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011387523306

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011387523306

Navigation