Abstract
The Kyoto Protocol allows Annex I countries to use afforestation (theconversion of non-forest landto forest) to meet emissions reduction targets. We present a new method forestimating the cost of CO2mitigation through afforestation based on econometric models of land use. Landuse models are developed from dataon observed land allocation decisions and quantify the relationship betweenthe share of land in forest and the netreturns to forestry, among other land use determinants. The econometricapproach measures the actual responsesby landowners to observed changes in net returns, in contrast to earlierstudies in which landowner responses aredictated by the researcher. Models are estimated for Maine, South Carolina,and Wisconsin. The estimated modelsare used to simulate subsidies for afforestation, which imply increases inforest area and net reductions inatmospheric CO2 concentrations. Average cost measures – totalsubsidies divided by total carbon sequestered –are derived for afforestation programs with and without timber harvesting. Theuse of econometric land use modelsin integrated assessments of climate change is explored. We model the effectson land use patterns and the costsof CO2 mitigation of changes in the net returns to agricultureinduced by climate change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, R., Adams, D., Callaway, J., Chang, C., and McCarl, B.: 1993, ‘Sequestering Carbon on Agricultural Land: Social Cost and Impacts on TimberMarkets’, Contemp. Pol. Issues XI, 76–87.
Ahn, S., Plantinga, A. J., and Alig, R. J.: 2000, ‘Predicting Future Forest Land Area: A Comparison of Econometric Approaches’, For. Sci. 46, 363–376.
Alig, R., Adams, D., McCarl, B., Callaway, J., and Winnett, S.: 1997, ‘Assessing the Effects of Global Change Mitigation Strategies with an Inter-Temporal Model of the U.S. Forest and Agricultural Sectors’, Environ. Resour. Econ. 9, 259–274.
Birdsey, R. A.: 1992, Carbon Storage and Accumulation in United States Forest Ecosystems, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C., Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-59.
Cline, W. R.: 1992, The Economics of Global Warming, Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C.
Clinton, W. and Gore, A.: 1993, The Climate Change Action Plan, White House Office of Environmental Policy, Washington, D.C.
Davis, L. S. and Johnson, K. N.: 1987, Forest Management, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Hardie, I. W. and Parks, P. J.: 1997, ‘Land Use with Heterogeneous Quality: An Application of an Area Base Model’, Amer. J. Agric. Econ. 77, 299–310.
Harmon, M. E., Ferrell, W. K., and Franklin, J. F.: 1990, ‘Effects on Carbon Storage of Conversion of Old-Growth Forests to Young Forests’, Science 247, 699–702.
Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Callander, B. A., Harris, N., Kattenberg, A., and Maskell, K. (eds.): 1996, Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press.
Lichtenberg, E.: 1989, ‘Land Quality, Irrigation Development, and Cropping Patterns in the Northern High Plains’, Amer. J. Agric. Econ. 71, 187–194.
Mendelsohn, R., Nordhaus, W. D., and Shaw, D.: 1994, ‘The Impact of Global Warming on Agriculture: A Ricardian Analysis’, Amer. Econ. Rev. 84, 753–771. 40 ANDREW J. PLANTINGA AND THOMAS MAULDIN
Miller, D. J. and Plantinga, A. J.: 1999, ‘Modeling Land Use Decisions with Aggregate Data’, Amer. J. Agric. Econ. 81, 180–194.
Moulton, R. and Richards, K.: 1990, Costs of Sequestering Carbon through Tree Planting and Forest Management in the U.S., U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C., Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-58.
Nerlove, M.: 1971, ‘Further Evidence on the Estimation of Dynamic Economic Relations from a Time Series of Cross Sections’, Econometrica 39, 359–381.
Parks, P. J. and Hardie, I.W.: 1995, ‘Least-Cost Forest Carbon Reserves: Cost-Effective Subsidies to Convert Marginal Agricultural Land to Forests’, Land Econ. 71, 122–136.
Parks, P. J., Kramer, R. A., and Heimlich, R. E.: 1995, ‘Simulating Cost-EffectiveWetlands Reserves: A Comparison of Positive and Normative Approaches’, Nat. Resour. Model. 9, 81–95.
Plantinga, A. J.: 1996, ‘The Effect of Agricultural Policies on Land Use and Environmental Quality’, Amer. J. Agric. Econ. 78, 1082–1091.
Plantinga, A. J. and Birdsey, R. A.: 1993, ‘Carbon Fluxes Resulting from U.S. Private Timberland Management’, Clim. Change 23, 37–53.
Plantinga, A. J. and Birdsey, R. A.: 1994, ‘Optimal Forest Stand Management when Benefits Are Derived from Carbon’, Nat. Resour. Model. 8, 373–387.
Plantinga, A. J., Mauldin, T., and Miller, D. J.: 1999, ‘An Econometric Analysis of the Cost of Sequestering Carbon in Forests’, Amer. J. Agric. Econ. 81, 812–824.
Richards, K. R.: 1997, ‘The Time Value of Carbon in Bottom-Up Studies’, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27, S279–S292.
Schatzki, S. T.: 1998, A Theoretical and Empirical Examination of Land Use Change under Uncertainty, Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University.
Sedjo, R. A. and Solomon, A. M.: 1989, ‘Climate and Forests’, in Rosenberg, N. J., Easterling, W. E. III, Crosson, P. R., and Darmstadter, J. (eds.), Greenhouse Warming: Abatement and Adaptation, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., pp. 105–119.
Smith, R.: 1995, ‘The Conservation Reserve Program as a Least-Cost Land Retirement Mechanism’, Amer. J. Agric. Econ. 77, 93–105.
Sohngen, B. and Mendelsohn, R.: 1998, ‘Valuing the Impact of Large-Scale Ecological Change in a Market: The Effect of Climate Change on U.S. Timber’, Amer. Econ. Rev. 88, 686–710.
Stavins, R.: 1999, ‘The Costs of Carbon Sequestration: A Revealed-Preference Approach’, Amer. Econ. Rev., 994–1009.
Stavins, R. and Jaffe, A.: 1990, ‘Unintended Impacts of Public Investment on Private Decisions: The Depletion of Forest Wetlands’, Amer. Econ. Rev., 337–352.
Stavins, R., Plantinga, A. J., and Lubowski, R.: 1998, ‘Land Use and Carbon Sinks: Econometric Estimation of the Carbon Sequestration Supply Function’, Department of Energy Grant Proposal.
U.S. Department of Agriculture: 1973, Land Capability Classification, SCS Agric. Handbook 210, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: 1995, State Workbook: Methodologies for Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Washington, D.C.
Vegetation/Ecosystem Modeling and Analysis Project (VEMAP) Members: 1995, ‘Vegetation/ Ecosystem Modeling and Analysis Project (VEMAP): Comparing Biogeography and Biogeochemistry Models in a Continental-Scale Study of Terrestrial Ecosystem Responses to Climate Change and CO2 Doubling’, Global Biogeochem. Cycles 9, 407–437.
Wu, J. and Segerson, K.: 1995, ‘The Impact of Policies and Land Characteristics on Potential Groundwater Pollution in Wisconsin’, Amer. J. Agric. Econ. 77, 1033–1047. (Received 26 July 1999; in revised form 7 August 2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Plantinga, A.J., Mauldin, T. A Method for Estimating the Cost of CO2 Mitigation through Afforestation. Climatic Change 49, 21–40 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010749214244
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010749214244