Abstract
This study draws on Kohlberg's Cognitive Moral Development Theory and Hofstede's Culture Theory to examine whether cultural differences are associated with variations in ethical reasoning. Ethical reasoning levels for auditors from Australia and China are expected to be different since auditors from China and Australia are also different in terms of the cultural dimensions of long term orientation, power distance, uncertainty avoidance and individualism. The Defining Issues Tests measuring ethical reasoning P scores were distributed to auditors from Australia and China including Hong Kong and The Chinese Mainland. Results show that auditors from Australia have higher ethical reasoning scores than those from China, consistent with Hofstede's Culture Theory predictions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold, D. and L. Ponemon: 1991, ‘Internal Auditors' Perceptions of Whistle-Blowing and the Influence of Moral Reasoning: An Experiment’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 10, 1-15.
Bain, N. and D. Band: 1996, Winning Ways through Corporate Governance (MacMillan Press Ltd., London).
Blalock, H. M. Jr. (eds.): 1979, Social Statistics (McGraw-Hill).
Colby, A. and L. Kohlberg: 1987, The Measurement of Moral Judgement (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY).
Etherington, L. and L. Schulting: 1995, ‘Ethical Development of Accountants: The Case of Canadian Certificed Management Accounts’, Research on Accounting Ethics, 235-251.
Ferrell, O. C. and L. G. Gresham: 1985, ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 49 (Summer), 87-96.
Gul, F. A. and J. Tsui: 1993, ‘A Comparative Study of Auditors' Attitudes to Uncertainty Qualifications: An Empirical Test of the Strong Versus Weak Uncertainty Avoidance Hypothesis’, The International Journal of Accounting 28, 356-364.
Gul, F. A. and J. Tsui: 1996, ‘Auditors' Behaviour in an Audit Conflict Situation: A Research Note on the Role of Locus of Control and Ethical Reasoning’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 21(1), 41-51.
Harrison, G. L.: 1992, ‘The Cross-Cultural Generalizability of the Relation Between Participation, Budget Emphasis and Job-related Attitudes’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(1), 1-15.
Hofstede, G. H.: 1980, Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Beverly Hills, Sage, CA).
Hofstede, G. H.: 1991, Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (McGraw-Hill, London).
Hofstede, G. H.: 1997, Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (McGraw Hill, London).
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC): 1999, Guidelines on Ethics for Professional Accountants (IFAC, New York).
Kite, D., T. Louwers and R. Radtke: 1996, ‘Ethics and Environmental Auditing: An Investigation of Environmental Auditors' Levels of Moral Reasoning’, Behavioral Research in Accounting 8 (Supplement), 200-214.
Kohlberg, L.: 1969, ‘Stages and Sequences: Cognitive Developmental Approach to Socialization’, in D. A. Goslin (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (Rand McNally, Chicago), pp. 347-480.
Kohlberg, L., C. Levine and D. Hewer: 1983, Moral Stages: A Current Formulation and a Response to Critics (Karger, New York).
Ma, H. K.: 1988, ‘Objective Moral Judgement in Hong Kong, Mainland China, and England’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 19(1), 78-95.
Mautz, R. K. and H. A. Sharaf: 1961, The Philosophy of Auditing (American Accounting Association).
Perera, M. H. B.: 1989, ‘Towards a Framework to Analyze the Impact of Culture on Accounting’, The International Journal of Accounting 4(1), 42-56.
Ponemon, L. A.: 1990, ‘Ethical Judgements in Accounting: A Cognitive-Developmental Perspective’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 1, 191-215.
Ponemon, L. A.: 1992a, ‘Ethical Reasoning and Selection-Socialization in Accounting’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 17 (April/May), 239-258.
Ponemon, L. A.: 1992b, ‘Auditor Underreporting of Time and Moral Reasoning: An Experimental-Lab Study’, Contemporary Accounting Research 9(1), 171-189.
Ponemon, L. A. and D. R. L. Gabhart: 1990, ‘Auditor Independence Judgments: A Cognitive Developmental Model and Experimental Evidence’, Contemporary Accounting Research 7(1), 227-251.
Ponemon, L. A. and D. R. L. Gabhart: 1993, Ethical Reasoning in Accounting and Auditing (CGA-Canada Research Foundation).
Rest, J. R.: 1979a, Development in Judging Moral Issues, Minneapolis (University of Minnesota Press, MN).
Rest, J. R.: 1979b, Revised Manual for the Defining Issues Test: An Objective Test of Moral Judgment Development (University of Minnesota Press, MN).
Rest, J. R.: 1986a, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory (Praeger, New York).
Rest, J. R.: 1986b, DIT: Manual for the Defining Issues Test (University of Minnesota, Center for the Study of Ethical Development, Minneapolis).
Rest, J. R.: 1993, Guide for the Defining Issues Test-How to Use the Optical Scan Forms and the Centre's Scoring Service (University of Minnesota, Centre for the study of Ethical Development).
Shaub, M. K.: 1994, ‘An Analysis of Factors Affecting the Cognitive Moral Development of Auditors and Auditing Students’, Journal of Accounting Education 12(1), 1-26.
Snarey, J. R.: 1985, ‘Cross-Cultural Universality of Social-Moral Development: A Critical Review of Kohlbergian Research’, Psychological Bulletin, 202-232.
Tsui, J.: 1996, ‘Auditors' Ethical Reasoning: Some Audit Conflict and Cross Cultural Evidence’, International Journal of Accounting 31, 121-133.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsui, J., Windsor, C. Some Cross-Cultural Evidence on Ethical Reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics 31, 143–150 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010727320265
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010727320265