Skip to main content
Log in

Geographic diversity of inter-county migration in the United States, 1980–1995

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focuses on the dynamics of internal migration since the 1970s nonmetropolitan turnaround period. In the first part of the study we analyze nationwide and regional net migration dynamics within an urban hierarchyframework for the three five-year periods 1980–85, 1985–90, and 1990–95.The analysis reveals the great diversity in spatial situations across the UnitedStates and provides a basis for evaluating alternative frameworks of populationredistribution trends. We find that both the deconcentration and the restructuring perspective are helpful for understanding the situation in certain regions at particular points in time, but should not be applied to conceptualize metropolitan-nonmetropolitan population redistribution for the nation as a whole. The second part of the study identifies the factors associated with the dynamics of county level migration that are revealed in the descriptive analysis. Using both residual method and actual migration stream data in amultivariate regression framework, the study reveals that job-related and socioeconomic well being variables are the most important and most consistent determinants of inter-county migration differentials regardless of the direction of net migration exchanges among counties up and down the settlement structure. Finally, we find that factors associated with attracting migrants also frequently increase out-migration and thus the direction of net migration istypically a function of whether a particular variable is more strongly associated with in-or out-migration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, A.J. (1994), Migration and unemployment duration among young adults, Papers in Regional Science 73: 289–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogue, D.F. (1969), Principles of demography. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D.L., Fuguitt, G.V., Heaton, T.B.& Waseem, S. (1997), Continuities in size of place preferences in the United States, 1972–1992, Rural Sociology 62: 408–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, M.A.& Beale, C.L. (1994), Rural-urban continuum codes for metro and nonmetro counties, 1993. Agriculture and Rural Economy Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Staff Report No. 9425, September 1994.

  • Cebula, R.J. (1979), The determinants of human migration. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, J. (1996), Interregional migration and regional development. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S.T. (1994), Evaluation of postcensal county estimates for the 1980s. Population Division Working Paper No. 5. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. (1991), Regression diagnostics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, W.H. (1987), Migration and depopulation of the metropolis: Regional restructuring or rural renaissance? American Sociological Review 52: 240–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, W.H. (1989), United States: Counterurbanization and metropolitan depopulation, pp. 34–61, in: A. Champion (ed.), Counterurbanization: The Changing Pace and Nature of Population deconcentration. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, W.H. (1995), Immigration and international migration ‘flight’ from US metropolitan areas: Toward a new demographic balkanization, Urban Studies 32: 733–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisbie, W.P.& Poston, D.L. (1975), Components of sustenance organization and nonmetropolitan population change: A human ecological investigation, American Sociological Review 40: 773–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisbie, W.P.& Poston, D.L. (1978), Sustenance differentiation and population redistribution, Social Forces 57: 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuguitt, G.V.& Beale, C.L. (1995), Recent trends in nonmetropolitan migration: Toward a new turnaround? University of Wisconsin, Center for Demography and Ecology.

  • Fuguitt, G.V., Brown, D.L.& Beale, C.L. (1989), Rural and small town America. The population of the United States in the 1980s: A census monograph series.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghali, M., Akiyama, M.& Fujiwara, J. (1978), Factor mobility and regional growth, The Review of Economics and Statistics 60: 78–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, W. (1946), Small businesses and the community: A study in the Central Valley of California on the effects of scale of farm operation.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, P.E. (1983), Migration with a composite amenity: The role of rents, Journal of Regional Science 23: 541–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M.J. (1973), A simultaneous-equations model of urban growth and migration, Journal of the American Statistical Association 70: 797–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M.J. (1975), Simultaneity bias in migration models: An empirical examination, Demography 12: 519–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M.J.& Hunt, G.L. (1989),Migration and interregional employment redistribution in the United States, American Economic Review 74: 957–969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D.N. (1995), Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J.R.& Todaro, M.P. (1970),Migration, unemployment, and development: A two-sector analysis, American Economic Review 60: 126–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, B. (1992), Industrial districts: Old wine in new bottles, Regional Studies 26: 469–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, K.T. (1985), Crabgrass frontier. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K.M.& Beale, C.L. (1994), The recent revival of widespread population growth in nonmetropolitan America, Rural Sociology 29: 655–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kephart, G. (1989), The effect of unemployment rates on out-migration from United States counties: A reappraisal. Pennsylvania State University, Population Issues Research Center.

  • Long, L.& Nucci, A. (1998), Accounting for two population turnarounds in nonmetropolitan America, pp. 47–70, in: H.K. Schwarzweller& B.P. Mullan (eds.), Research in rural sociology and development. Volume 7. Focus on migration.Stamford, CT: J.A.I. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, I.S. (1966). Migration and metropolitan growth: Two analytical models. San Francisco, CA: Chandler Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyson, T.A.& Tolbert, C.M. (1996), Small manufacturing and nonmetropolitan socioeconomic well being, Environment and Planning A 28: 1779–1794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C.W.& Ulmer, M.J. (1946), Small business and civic welfare. Report of the Smaller War Plants Corporation to the special committee to study problems of American small business. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Management and Budget, Statistical Policy Office. (1993), Bulletin No. 93-17: Revised statistical definitions for metropolitan areas, June 30, 1993. Washington, DC

  • Office ofManagement and Budget. Piore, M.J.& Sabel, C.F. (1984), The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plane, D.A. (1989), Population migration and economic restructuring in the United States, International Regional Science Review 12: 263–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Population Reference Bureau (1999), Report on America. Volume 1, Number 3: The rural rebound. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poston, D.L., Hirschl, T.A.& Frisbie, W.P. (1992), Sustenance organization and population redistribution in New York State: A human ecological analysis, pp. 193–220, in: P.C. Jobes, W.F. Stinner& J.M. Wardwell (eds.), Community, society and migration: Noneconomic migration in America. Lanham, MD: University Press in America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poston, D.L.& Mao, M.X. (1996), An ecological investigation of interstate migration in the United States, 1985–1990, Advances in Human Ecology 5: 303–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shryock, H.S., Siegel, J.S.&Associates. (1976), The methods and materials of demography. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census (various years), County population estimates and demographic components of population change: Annual time series.

  • U.S. National Center for Health Statistics (various years), Vital statistics of the United States.

  • Wardwell, J.M. (1980). Toward a theory of urban-rural migration in the developed world, pp. 71–114, in: D.L. Brown& J.M. Wardwell (eds.), New directions in urban-rural migration. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rayer, S., Brown, D.L. Geographic diversity of inter-county migration in the United States, 1980–1995. Population Research and Policy Review 20, 229–252 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010654618859

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010654618859

Navigation