Abstract
This article sets forward a new concept of reflection, to be contrasted with more usual reading of the concept for which we use the term `reflectivity'. The contrast is related to a distinction between normalizing education and counter-education. We claim that within the framework of normalizing education there is no room for reflection, but only for reflectivity. In contrast to reflectivity, reflection manifests a struggle of the subject against the effects of power which govern the constitution of her conceptual apparatus, her knowledge, her consciousness and her limitations and possibilities for successful functioning. Reflectivity re-presents the hegemonic realm of self-evidence and the productive violence of social and cultural order. Reflection, by contrast, aims to challenge the supposedly self-evident and the present order of things. Reflection aims at transcendence and represents a moral commitment in respect of the otherness of the Other, which power relations in every realm of self-evidence oblige us to neglect, to destroy or consume. Transcendence is a concrete utopia, and so is the subject in her nonrepressive communication with the Other: they are part and parcel of our present possibilities, sometimes in microscopic arenas, struggled for, and from time to time even realized.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam, B.: 1996, ‘Detraditionalization and the Centrality of Uncertain Futures’, in P. Heelas and S. Lash (eds.), Detraditionalization; Critical Reflections on Authority and Identity, Oxford, pp. 134-148.
Benjamin, W.: 1974, ‘Theologisch-politische Fragment’, in Gesammelte Schriften, II. 1, Frankfurt a. Main.
Blake, N.: 1995, ‘Ideal Speech Conditions,Modern Discourse and Education’, Journal of Philosophy of Education 29(3).
Brown, R. H.: 1994, ‘Reconstructing Social Theory after the Postmodern Critique’, in H. Simon and M. Billig (eds.), After Postmodernism; Reconstructing Ideology Critique, London, pp. 12-37.
Clinton, B.: 1997, State of the Union Address, White House, http://www.whitehouse.gov.WH/ SOU97/.
Derrida, J.: 1973, Speech and Phenomenon and other Essays on Husserl's Theory of Signs, Evanston.
Doll, W.: 1993, A Postmodern Perspective on Curriculum, New York.
Giroux, H.: 1992, Border Crossings: Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education, New York and London.
Giroux, H.: 1993, ‘Foreword’, in William G. Tierney (eds.), Building Communities of Difference: Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century, London.
Grossberg, L.: 1998, It's a Sin, Sydney, NewYork.
Gur-Ze'ev, I., ‘Toward a Nonrepressive Critical Pedagogy’, Educational Theory (Fall 1998), 463-486.
Hooks, B.: 1990, Yearning: Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics, Toronto.
Lankshear, C., Peters, M. and Knobel, M.: 1996, ‘Critical Pedagogy and Cyberspace’, in H. Giroux, C. Lankshear, P. McLaren and M. Peters (eds.), Counternarratives: Cultural Studies and Critical Pedagogies in Postmodern Space, New York.
Lather, P.: 1994, ‘Staying Dumb? Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in the Postmodern’, in H. Simon and M. Billig (eds.), After Postmodernism; Reconstructing Ideology Critique, London.
Levinas, E.: 1987a, ‘Philosophy and the Idea of Infinity’, in Collected Philosophical Papers, translated by Alphonso Lingis, Dordrecht, Boston and Lancaster.
Levinas, E.: 1987b, ‘God and Philosophy’, in Collected Philosophical Papers, translated by Alphonso Lingis, Dordrecht, Boston and Lancaster.
Levinas, E.: 1996, ‘Meaning and Sense’, in A. Peperzak, S. Critchley and R. Bernasconi (eds.), Basic Philosophical Writings, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
Masschelein, J.: 1996, ‘Die ergebnislose und funktionslose Erziehung’, in J. Masschelein und M. Wimmer (eds.), Alteritaet, Pluralitaet, Gerechtigkeit, Leuven.
Masschelein, J.: 1998, ‘How to Imagine Something Exterior to the System: Critical Education as Problematization’, Educational Theory (Fall 1998), 421-530.
Toffler, A., Dyson, E., Gilder, G. and Keyworth, G.: 1999, ‘Cyberspace and American Dream: A Magna Carta for the Knowledge Age’, release 1.2 http://www.townhal.com/co./pff/position.html.
Weis, S., Gaon, Y. and Apelbaum, H.: 1996, Innovation and Industrial Thinking, Tel Aviv (in Hebrew).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gu-Ze'ev, I., Masschelein, J. & Blake, N. Reflectivity, Reflection, and Counter-Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 20, 93–106 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010303001871
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010303001871