Abstract
This paper furnishes evidence of innovative modes of organisationof inter-firm relationships and knowledge management within industrialdistricts. With the aid of a district firm, we first highlight the marked tendency among the largest companies to eschew an exclusively endogenous innovative process. Next, we analyse how the leading firm can play an active role within a network by assigning outside its boundaries tasks that were once undertaken in-house. This happens gradually with the moderate hierarchisation of originally destructured network relationships. In its attempt to organise innovative modes of design and manufacturing, without losing control and strategic legitimisation, the leading firm elects a coordinating agent withdirect responsibility over a selected team of specialist suppliers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almeida, P. and P. Kogut: 1999, “Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks”, Management Science45: 905–917.
Antonelli, C.: 1999, “The Evolution of the Industrial Organization of the Production of Knowledge”, Cambridge Economic Journal: 243–260.
Benko, G. and M. Dunford (eds.): 1991, Industrial Change and Regional Development: The Transformation of New Industrial Spaces(London and New York: Pinter, Belhaven Press).
Boari, C.: 1982, “L'evoluzione del fenomeno decentramento-terzismo nel sistema industriale giapponese”, Economia e Politica Industriale35: 157–179.
Boari, C.: 1999, Industrial Clusters and SMEs Development: An Italian Perspective(Chang-May, World Bank).
Bonaccorsi, A. and A. Lipparini: 1994, “Strategic Partnerships in New Product Development: An Italian Case Study”, Journal of Production Innovation Management11: 134–145.
Brusco, S.: 1982, “The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralisation and Social Integration”, Cambridge Journal of Economics6: 167–189.
Cohen, W. and D. Levinthal: 1990, “Absortive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly35: 128–152.
Di Maggio, P.J. and W.W. Powell: 1983, “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields”, American Sociological Review48: 147–160.
Dyer, J.H.: 1996, “Specialized Supplier Networks as a Source of Competitive Advantage: Evidence from the Auto Industry”, Strategic Management Journal17: 271–291.
Dyer, J.H. and K. Nobeoka: 2000, “Creating and Managing a High Performance Knowledge-Sharing Network: The Toyota Case”, Strategic Management Journal21: 345–367.
Enright, M.J.: 1991, Geographic Concentration and Industrial Organization(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University).
Enright, M.J.: 1993, The Geographic Scope of Competitive Advantage. Working Paper n. 93–060, Harvard Business School.
Fruin, M.W.: 1992, The Japanese Enterprise System(New York: Oxford University Press).
Goodman, E., J. Bamford and P. Saynor (eds.): 1989, Small Firms and Industrial Districts in Italy(London: Routledge).
Grant, R.M.: 1996, “Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal17: 109–122.
Grant, R.M. and C. Baden Fuller: 1995, “A Knowledge-Based Theory of Inter-Firm Collaboration”, Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings: 17–21.
Hamel, G.: 1991, “Competition for Competence and Inter-Partner Learning Within International Strategic Alliances”, Strategic Management Journal12: 83–103.
Hassen-Bauer, J. and C.C. Snow: 1996, “Responding to Hypercompetition: The Structure and Processes of a Regional Learning Network Organization”, Organization Science7(4): 413–427.
Jaffe, A., M. Trajtenberg and R. Henderson: 1993, “Geographical Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations”, Quarterly Journals of Economics108: 577–598.
Kogut, B. and U. Zander: 1992, “Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology”, Organization Science 3(3): 383–397.
Lazerson, M. and G. Lorenzoni: 1999, “The Firms that Feed Industrial Districts: A Return to the Italian Source”, Industrial and Corporate Change8(2): 235–266.
Levinthal, D.A.: 1996, Organizations and Capabilities: The Role of Cecompositions and Units of Selection. Working Paper, The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
Lipparini, A.: 1995, Imprese, relazioni tra imprese e posizionamento competitivo(Milano: Etas Libri).
Lorenzoni, G. and O. Ornati: 1988, “Constellations of Firms and New Ventures”, Journal of Business Venturing3: 41–57.
Lorenzoni, G. and C. Baden-Fuller: 1995, “Creating a Strategic Center toManage aWeb of Partners”, California Management Revue37: 146–163.
Lorenzoni, G. and A. Lipparini: 1999, “The Leveraging of Inter-Firm Relationships as a Distinctive Organizational Capability. A Longitudinal Study”, Strategic Management Journal20: 317–338.
Madhavan, R., B.R. Koka and J.E. Prescott: 1998, “Networks in Transition: How Industry Events (Re)shape Interfirm Relationships”, Strategic Management Journal19(5): 439–459.
Marshall, A.: 1919, Industry and Trade(London: Macmillan).
Mowery, D.C., J.E. Oxley and B.S. Silverman: 1996, “Strategic Alliances and Interfirm Knowledge Transfer”, Strategic Management Journal17: 77–91.
Nelson, R. and S. Winter: 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Nonaka, I.: 1994, “A Dynamic Theory of Organizatinal Knowledge Creation”, Organization Science5(1): 14–37.
Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi: 1995, The Knowledge-Creating Company(Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Odaka, K. and F. Adachi: 1982, Motorvehicle Industry in Asia. A Study of Ancillary Firm Development(Singapore: Singapore University Press).
Piore, M.J.: 1986, “Perspective on Labour Market Flexibility”, Industrial Relations25(2): 146–166.
Piore, M.J. and C. Sabel: 1984, The Second Industrial Divide(New York: Basic Books).
Polanyi, M.: 1966, The Tacit Dimension(London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Porter, M.E.: 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations(New York: The Free Press).
Porter, M.E.: 1998, “Clusters and the New Economics of Competition”, Harvard Business Review(November- December): 77–90.
Powell, W.W. and P. Brantley: 1992, “Competitive Cooperation in Biotechnology: Learning Through Networks?” in N. Nohria and R. Eccles (eds.), Networks and Organizations(Boston: Harvard Business School Press), pp. 366–394.
Powell, W.W., K.W. Koput and L. Smith-Doerr: 1996, “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology”, Administrative Science Quarterly41: 116–145.
Pyke, F., G. Becattini and W. Sengenberger (eds.): 1990, Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Co-Operation in Italy(Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies).
Reed, R. and R. De Filippi: 1990, “Casual Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation and Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, Academy of Management Review15: 88–102.
Saxenian, A.: 1994, Regional Advantage. Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Schmitz, H.: 1995, “Small Shoemakers and Fordist Giants: Tales of Supercluster”, World Development23(1): 9–28.
Sengenberger, W., G.W. Loveman and M.J. Piore (eds.): 1990, The Re-Emergence of Small Enterprises: Industrial Restructuring in Industrialised Countries(Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies).
Sölvell, Ö. and I. Zander: 1998, “International Diffusion of Knowledge: Isolating Mechanisms and the Role of MNE”, in A.D. Chandler, P. Hagström and Ö. Sölvel (eds.), The Dynamic Firm(Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 402–416.
Spender, J.-C.: 1996, “Making Knowledge the Basis of a Dynamic Theory of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal17: 45–62.
Tsoukas, H.: 1996, “The Firm as a Distributed Knowledge System: A Constructionist Approach”, Strategic Management Journal17: 11–25.
Uzzi, B.: 1997, “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness”, Administrative Science Quarterly42: 35–67.
Williams, K., T. Cutler, J. Williams and C. Haslam: 1987, “The End of Mass Production”, Economy and Society16(3): 405–439.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boari, C., Lipparini, A. Networks within Industrial Districts: Organising Knowledge Creation and Transfer by Means of Moderate Hierarchies. Journal of Management & Governance 3, 339–360 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009989028605
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009989028605