Skip to main content
Log in

Networks within Industrial Districts: Organising Knowledge Creation and Transfer by Means of Moderate Hierarchies

  • Published:
Journal of Management and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper furnishes evidence of innovative modes of organisationof inter-firm relationships and knowledge management within industrialdistricts. With the aid of a district firm, we first highlight the marked tendency among the largest companies to eschew an exclusively endogenous innovative process. Next, we analyse how the leading firm can play an active role within a network by assigning outside its boundaries tasks that were once undertaken in-house. This happens gradually with the moderate hierarchisation of originally destructured network relationships. In its attempt to organise innovative modes of design and manufacturing, without losing control and strategic legitimisation, the leading firm elects a coordinating agent withdirect responsibility over a selected team of specialist suppliers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeida, P. and P. Kogut: 1999, “Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks”, Management Science45: 905–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli, C.: 1999, “The Evolution of the Industrial Organization of the Production of Knowledge”, Cambridge Economic Journal: 243–260.

  • Benko, G. and M. Dunford (eds.): 1991, Industrial Change and Regional Development: The Transformation of New Industrial Spaces(London and New York: Pinter, Belhaven Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boari, C.: 1982, “L'evoluzione del fenomeno decentramento-terzismo nel sistema industriale giapponese”, Economia e Politica Industriale35: 157–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boari, C.: 1999, Industrial Clusters and SMEs Development: An Italian Perspective(Chang-May, World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi, A. and A. Lipparini: 1994, “Strategic Partnerships in New Product Development: An Italian Case Study”, Journal of Production Innovation Management11: 134–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusco, S.: 1982, “The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralisation and Social Integration”, Cambridge Journal of Economics6: 167–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. and D. Levinthal: 1990, “Absortive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly35: 128–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Maggio, P.J. and W.W. Powell: 1983, “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields”, American Sociological Review48: 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.: 1996, “Specialized Supplier Networks as a Source of Competitive Advantage: Evidence from the Auto Industry”, Strategic Management Journal17: 271–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H. and K. Nobeoka: 2000, “Creating and Managing a High Performance Knowledge-Sharing Network: The Toyota Case”, Strategic Management Journal21: 345–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, M.J.: 1991, Geographic Concentration and Industrial Organization(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, M.J.: 1993, The Geographic Scope of Competitive Advantage. Working Paper n. 93–060, Harvard Business School.

  • Fruin, M.W.: 1992, The Japanese Enterprise System(New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, E., J. Bamford and P. Saynor (eds.): 1989, Small Firms and Industrial Districts in Italy(London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M.: 1996, “Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal17: 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M. and C. Baden Fuller: 1995, “A Knowledge-Based Theory of Inter-Firm Collaboration”, Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings: 17–21.

  • Hamel, G.: 1991, “Competition for Competence and Inter-Partner Learning Within International Strategic Alliances”, Strategic Management Journal12: 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassen-Bauer, J. and C.C. Snow: 1996, “Responding to Hypercompetition: The Structure and Processes of a Regional Learning Network Organization”, Organization Science7(4): 413–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., M. Trajtenberg and R. Henderson: 1993, “Geographical Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations”, Quarterly Journals of Economics108: 577–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and U. Zander: 1992, “Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology”, Organization Science 3(3): 383–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazerson, M. and G. Lorenzoni: 1999, “The Firms that Feed Industrial Districts: A Return to the Italian Source”, Industrial and Corporate Change8(2): 235–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D.A.: 1996, Organizations and Capabilities: The Role of Cecompositions and Units of Selection. Working Paper, The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

  • Lipparini, A.: 1995, Imprese, relazioni tra imprese e posizionamento competitivo(Milano: Etas Libri).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, G. and O. Ornati: 1988, “Constellations of Firms and New Ventures”, Journal of Business Venturing3: 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, G. and C. Baden-Fuller: 1995, “Creating a Strategic Center toManage aWeb of Partners”, California Management Revue37: 146–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, G. and A. Lipparini: 1999, “The Leveraging of Inter-Firm Relationships as a Distinctive Organizational Capability. A Longitudinal Study”, Strategic Management Journal20: 317–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhavan, R., B.R. Koka and J.E. Prescott: 1998, “Networks in Transition: How Industry Events (Re)shape Interfirm Relationships”, Strategic Management Journal19(5): 439–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A.: 1919, Industry and Trade(London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D.C., J.E. Oxley and B.S. Silverman: 1996, “Strategic Alliances and Interfirm Knowledge Transfer”, Strategic Management Journal17: 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. and S. Winter: 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I.: 1994, “A Dynamic Theory of Organizatinal Knowledge Creation”, Organization Science5(1): 14–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi: 1995, The Knowledge-Creating Company(Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Odaka, K. and F. Adachi: 1982, Motorvehicle Industry in Asia. A Study of Ancillary Firm Development(Singapore: Singapore University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M.J.: 1986, “Perspective on Labour Market Flexibility”, Industrial Relations25(2): 146–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M.J. and C. Sabel: 1984, The Second Industrial Divide(New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M.: 1966, The Tacit Dimension(London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E.: 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations(New York: The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E.: 1998, “Clusters and the New Economics of Competition”, Harvard Business Review(November- December): 77–90.

  • Powell, W.W. and P. Brantley: 1992, “Competitive Cooperation in Biotechnology: Learning Through Networks?” in N. Nohria and R. Eccles (eds.), Networks and Organizations(Boston: Harvard Business School Press), pp. 366–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W., K.W. Koput and L. Smith-Doerr: 1996, “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology”, Administrative Science Quarterly41: 116–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, F., G. Becattini and W. Sengenberger (eds.): 1990, Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Co-Operation in Italy(Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, R. and R. De Filippi: 1990, “Casual Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation and Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, Academy of Management Review15: 88–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A.: 1994, Regional Advantage. Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, H.: 1995, “Small Shoemakers and Fordist Giants: Tales of Supercluster”, World Development23(1): 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengenberger, W., G.W. Loveman and M.J. Piore (eds.): 1990, The Re-Emergence of Small Enterprises: Industrial Restructuring in Industrialised Countries(Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sölvell, Ö. and I. Zander: 1998, “International Diffusion of Knowledge: Isolating Mechanisms and the Role of MNE”, in A.D. Chandler, P. Hagström and Ö. Sölvel (eds.), The Dynamic Firm(Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 402–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J.-C.: 1996, “Making Knowledge the Basis of a Dynamic Theory of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal17: 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H.: 1996, “The Firm as a Distributed Knowledge System: A Constructionist Approach”, Strategic Management Journal17: 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B.: 1997, “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness”, Administrative Science Quarterly42: 35–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K., T. Cutler, J. Williams and C. Haslam: 1987, “The End of Mass Production”, Economy and Society16(3): 405–439.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boari, C., Lipparini, A. Networks within Industrial Districts: Organising Knowledge Creation and Transfer by Means of Moderate Hierarchies. Journal of Management & Governance 3, 339–360 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009989028605

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009989028605

Keywords

Navigation