Skip to main content
Log in

Classification and ordination of plant formations in the Pantanal of Brazil

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Classification and ordination of plant formations are presented for a seasonally flooded plain of the Brazilian Pantanal. Phytosociological data were collected on 10 physiognomically distinct formations during the rainy, flood, and dry seasons. The degree of association among plant species was measured with Jaccard similarity index, and both Jaccard similarity index and Bray Curtis distance index were employed to classify sample units into similar groups. The ordination of plant species and sample units were performed with Correspondence Analysis. Four groups of plant formations were significantly distinct on a quantitative basis: marsh ponds/waterlogged basins, short grasslands, tall grassland/scrub, and forest-edges. These formations were ordered along a gradient of topographic relief from depressions with permanent standing water (marshes) through flats subject to seasonal flooding (grasslands and scrub) and mounds of sandy soil above the flood level (forests). Although hydroperiod appears to be one of the most important variables, the distribution of plant species within wetlands is most probably explained by the interaction of many additional factors. A few plant species could be used as indicators of the local hydrological and edaphic conditions, e.g., Eleocharis elegans, Aeschynomene fluminensis, Hydrolea spinosa, and Hymenachne amplexicaulis for marsh ponds, and Caperonia castaneifolia, Diodia kuntzei, and Eleocharis acutangula for waterlogged basins. The procedure presented in this study could be developed as a tool for the inventory and management of the Pantanal and other palustrine wetland habitats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adámoli, J. 1986. Fitogeografia do Pantanal. Anais do simpósio sobre recursos naturais e sócio-econômicos do Pantanal, EMBRAPA, Brasília, Brazil 5: 105-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alho, C. R. J., Lacher, T. E. & Goncąlves, H.C. 1988. Environmental degradation in the Pantanal ecosystem. Bioscience38: 164-171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, A. C. & Valls, J. F. M. 1987. Recursos forrageiros nativos do Pantanal Mato-grossense. EMBRAPA-CENARGEN,Brasília, Brazil, Documentos 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasil. 1982. Projeto RADAMBRASIL, 27. Ministério das Minas e Energia, Brasília, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brum, P. A. R., Sousa, J. C., Comastri Filho, J. A. & Almeida, I. L. 1987. Deficiências minerais de bovinos na sub-região dos Paiaguás, no Pantanal Mato-grossense. Pesq. Agrop. Bras. 22: 1039-1048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, H. T. & Stephenson, W. 1988. An introduction to numerical classification. Academic Press, New York, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, J. H., McDowell, L. R., Ellis, G. L. & Loosli, J. K. 1985. Minerais para ruminantes em pastejo em regiões tropicais. University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin, L. M. & Golet, F. C. 1995. US Fish and Wildlife Service 1979 wetland classification: A review.Vegetation 118: 139-152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, R. L. & Tiver, N. S. 1948. Survey methods in grassland ecology. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 3: 1-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York, USA.

  • Eiten, G. 1985. Vegetation near Santa Teresinha, NE Mato Grosso. Acta Amazonica 15: 275-301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, C. M. & van der Valk, A. G. 1995. Wetland classification and inventory: A summary. Vegetatio 118: 185-192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, R. 1995. Flora and vegetation of 'Las Piedritas' and the margin of Laguna Cáceres, Puerto Suárez, Bolivian Pantanal. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 122: 314-319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, B. & Sah, M. 1995. Inventory and classification of wetlands in India. Vegetatio 118: 39-48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goslee, S. C., Brooks, R. P. & Cole, C. A. 1997. Plants as indicators of wetland water source. Plant Ecol. 131: 199-206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarim Neto, G. 1984. Plantas do Brasil - angiospermas do Estado de Mato Grosso - I. Rodriguésia 36: 105-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarim Neto, G. 1991. Plantas do Brasil - angiospermas do Estado de Mato Grosso - Pantanal. Act. Bot. Bras. 5: 25-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase, R. 1989. Plant communities of a savanna in northern Bolivia: I. Seasonally flooded grassland and gallery forest. Phytocoenologia 18: 55-82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase, R. 1990. Plant communities of a savanna in northern Bolivia: II. Palm swamps, dry grassland, and shrubland. Phytocoenologia 18: 343-370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoehne, F. C. 1923. Phytophysionomia do Estado de Mato-Grosso e ligeiras notas a respeito da composiç ão e distribuiç ão da sua flora. Melhoramentos, São Paulo, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoehne, F. C. 1936.O grande Pantanal de Mato Grosso. Bol. Agric., São Paulo 1936: 443-470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, L. & Legendre, P. 1984. Écologie numérique. v. 2. Masson, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, E. B. 1927. The grassland of New Zealand. Progress of regrassing experiments on deteriored hill county in Whangamomona County I. Interim results of burning and sowing trials: seed mixture recommended for second burns. N.Z.J. Agric. 34: 145-164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, E. B. & Madden, E. A. 1933. The point method of pasture analysis. N. Z. J. Agric. 46: 267-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig,, J. A. & Reynolds, J. F. 1988. Statistical Ecology: A primer on methods and computing. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantovani, W. & Martins, F.R. 1990.Ométodo de pontos. Acta Bot. Bras. 4: 95-122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, L.R. 1970. The dynamics of the community associated with amarine scleractinian coral. Int. Rev. Gesamten Hydrobiol. 55: 13-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirkin, B. M., Kononov, K. E., Gogoleve, P. A., Burtseva, E. I. & Naumova, L. G. 1992. The floodplain grasslands of middle Lena River: II. Classification. Folia Geob. Phyt. 27: 247-300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, R. N. 1982. Vegetation patterns in the mixed mesophytic forest of eastern Kentucky. Ecology 63: 1901-1917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo, L. G. 1995. An evaluation of the first inventory of South American wetlands. Vegetatio 118: 125-129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nores, J. G. 1984. Contenido de algunos elementos trazas en praderas naturales uruguayas. R, Fac. Agron. 35: 23-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, L. 1997. Niche Overlap Among Brown Brocket Deer, Pampas Deer, and Cattle. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Por, F. D. 1995. The Pantanal of Mato Grosso (Brazil). Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, U.K.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pott, A. 1988. Pastagens do Pantanal. EMBRAPA-CPAP, documentos 7, Corumbá, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pott, E. B., Brum, P. A. R., Almeida, I. L., Comastri Filho, J. A. & Dynia, J. F. 1987. Nutriç, ão mineral de bovinos de corte no Pantanal Mato-Grossense. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 22: 1093-1109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pott, E. B., Almeida, I. L., Brum, P.A. R., Comastri Filho, J.A., Pott, A. & Dynia, J. F. 1989. Nutriç ão mineral de bovinos de corte do Pantanal Mato-Grossense: 2. Micronutrientes na Nhecolândia (Parte Central). Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 24: 109-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prance, G. T. & Schaller, G. B. 1982. Preliminary study of some vegetation types of the Pantanal, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Brittonia 32: 223-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsar Convention Bureau. 1990. Directory of Wetlands of International Importnace. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratter, J. A., Pott, A., Pott, V. J., Cunha, C. N. & Haridasan, M. 1989. Observations on woody vegetation types in the Pantanal and at Corumbá, Brazil. Notes RBG Edinb. 45: 503-525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzini, C. T. 1979. Tratado de Fitogeografia do Brasil: aspectos ecológicos e florísticos, Vol 2. HUCITEC Ltda., São Paulo, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, P. A., Weaver, G. T. & Cavanaugh, J. A. 1978. Vegetation and tree species patterns near the northern terminus of the Southern Floodplain Forest. Ecol. Monogr. 48: 249-267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, P. A., Mackenzie, M. D. & Elliot, L. F. 1984. Gradient analysis and classification of the woody vegetation for 4 sites in southern Illinois and adjacent Missouri. Vegetatio58: 87-104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. A. & Jones, T. A. 1995. Classification and inventory of wetlands: A global overview. Vegetatio 118: 3-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semeniuk, C. A. & Semeniuk, V. 1995. A geomorphic approach to global classification for inland wetlands. Vegetatio 118: 103-124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. The University of Illinois Press, Urbana, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spichiger, R., Ramella, L., Palese, R. & Mereles F. 1991. Proposici ón de leyenda para la cartografía de las formaciones vegetales del Chaco paraguayo. Contribuición al estudio de la flora y de la vegetación del Chaco. III. Candollea 46: 541-564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak, C. J. F. 1989.CANOCO- an extension ofDECORANAto analyze species-environment relationships. Hydrobiologia184: 169-170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak, C. J. F. 1990. Update notes: CANOCO version 3.10. Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. S. 1960. Changes in vegetation since the advent of myxomatosis. J. Ecol. 48: 287-306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veloso, H. P. 1948. Considerações sobre a vegetação do Estado de Mato Grosso: (II) notas preliminares sobre o pantanal e zonas de transição. Boletim Geográfico6: 798-943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westman, W. E. 1980. Gaussian analysis: identifying environmental factors influencing bell-shaped species distributions. Ecology 61: 733-739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmann, W. C. & Siggeirson, E. I. 1954. Comparison of line interception and point contact methods in the analysis of mixed grass range vegetation. Ecology 35: 431-436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinder, L., Rosso, S. Classification and ordination of plant formations in the Pantanal of Brazil. Plant Ecology 136, 151–165 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009796616824

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009796616824

Navigation