Skip to main content
Log in

Extraction and Replacement of Permanent Pacemaker Leads Through Occluded Vessels: Use of Extraction Sheaths as Conduits - Balloon Venoplasty as an Adjunct

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients (pts) may present for lead extraction with symptomatic or asymptomatic subclavian vein or superior vena cava thrombosis. Replacement of permanent pacemaker leads (PPLs) in these pts may be difficult and may require accessing a new site. We examined the utility of replacing PPLs through completely occluded vessels using extraction sheaths as conduits through the total occlusion.

Over six years, a total of 210 atrial and/or ventricular PPLs were extracted from 137 pts. Two pts presented with angiographically documented thrombotic occlusion of the subclavian vein. One additional pt, who had presented with a superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome, had a totally occluded innominate vein and SVC occlusion. Balloon venoplasty was used as an adjunct to dilate the SVC.

In all pts, after PPLs were removed via a subclavian extraction sheath through the occluded vessel, the retained sheath was used to place a guide wire, then a peel away dilating sheath, to insert new PPLs, in each case on the side of total venous occlusion. Seven PPLs and two lead fragments were extracted, and five new PPLs replaced, ipsilateral to the venous occlusion.

These data show that extraction of PPLs through thrombosed veins may be performed successfully and may not require replacing the leads through a new site. This technique spares the pt the need to access the opposite subclavian vein, and it avoids an excessive number of PPLs in the subclavian vein and SVC. The procedure illustrates an efficient means to reintroduce new PPLs with the potential to reduce associated morbidity, since repeat puncture of the subclavian vein is not required. Safety of the procedure as a whole must be considered with regard to the known risks of lead extraction, some complications of which may be substantial using current techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Byrd C, Swartz M, Hedin N, et al. Lead extraction: Indications and techniques. Cardiology Clinics 1992;10:735–748.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smith H, Fearnot N, Byrd C, et al. Five years' experience with intravascular lead extraction. US Lead Extraction Database. PACE 1994;17:2016–2020.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smith C, Messenger J, Schaner S, et al. Cardiac pacemaker electrodes: Improved methods of extraction. Work in progress. Radiology 1994;193:739–742.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Spittell P, Vlietstra R, Hayes D, et al. Venous obstruction due to permanent transvenous pacemaker electrodes: Treatment with percutaneous transluminal balloon venoplasty. PACE 1990;13:271–274.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Spittell P, Hayes D. Venous complications after insertion of a transvenous pacemaker. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 1992;67:258–265.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goudevenos JA, Reid PG, Adams PC, Holden MP, Williams DO. Pacemaker-induced superior vena cava syndrome: Report of four cases and review of the literature. PACE 1989;12:1890–1895.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zerbe F, Ponizynski A, Dyszkiewicz W, Ziemianski A, Dziegielewski T, Krug H. Functionless retained pacing leads in the cardiovascular system. A complication of pacemaker treatment. Br Heart J 1985;54:76–79.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Matthews DM, Forfar JC. Superior vena caval stenosis: A complication of transvenous endocardial pacing. Thorax 1979;34:412–413.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Antonelli D, Turgeman Y, Kaveh Z, et al. Short-term thrombosis after transvenous pacemaker insertion. PACE 1989; 12:280–282.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mitrovic V, Thormann J, Schlepper M, et al. Thrombotic complications with pacemakers. Int J Cardiol 1983; 2:363–374.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marzo KP, Schwartz R, Glanz S. Early restenosis following percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty for the treatment of the superior vena caval syndrome due to pacemaker-induced stenosis. Cath & Cardiovasc Diag 1995; 36:128–131.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kastner RJ, Fisher WG, Blacky AR, Bacon ME. Pacemaker-induced superior vena cava syndrome with successful treatment by balloon venoplasty. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:789–790.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Francis CM, Starkey IR, Errington ML, Gillespie IN. Venous stenting as treatment for pacemaker-induced superior vena cava syndrome. Am Heart J 1995;129:836–837.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pace, J.N., Maquilan, M., Hessen, S.E. et al. Extraction and Replacement of Permanent Pacemaker Leads Through Occluded Vessels: Use of Extraction Sheaths as Conduits - Balloon Venoplasty as an Adjunct. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 1, 271–279 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009724908464

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009724908464

Navigation