Skip to main content
Log in

RFLP mapping of QTLs conferring cold tolerance during seed germination in an interspecific cross of tomato

  • Published:
Molecular Breeding Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most cultivars of tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum, are sensitive to low (chilling) temperatures (0–15 °C) during seed germination; however, genetic sources of cold (chilling) tolerance have been identified within the related wild species. The purpose of this study was to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) that contribute to cold tolerance during germination in tomato using a backcross population of an interspecific cross between a cold-sensitive tomato line (NC84173, recurrent parent) and a L. pimpinellifolium accession (LA722) that germinates rapidly under low temperatures. A total of 119 BC1 individuals were genotyped for 151 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers and a genetic linkage map was constructed. The parental lines and 119 BC1S1 families (self-pollinated progeny of the BC1 individuals) were evaluated for germination at a low temperature (11±0.5 °C). Germination was scored visually as radicle protrusion at 8 h intervals for 28 consecutive days. Germination response was analyzed by the survival analysis and the times to 25, 50 and 75% germination were calculated. In addition, a germination index (GI) was calculated as the weighted mean of the time from imbibition to germination for each family/line. Two QTL mapping techniques, interval mapping (using MAPMAKER/QTL) and single-point analysis (using QGENE), were used to identify QTLs. The results of both methods were similar and two chromosomal locations (3–5 putative QTLs) with significant effects on low temperature germination were identified. The L. pimpinellifolium accession had favorable QTL alleles on chromosomes 1 and NC84173 had favorable QTL alleles on chromosome 4. The percentage of phenotypic variation explained (PVE) by individual QTLs ranged from 11.9% to 33.4%. Multilocus analysis indicated that the cumulative action of all significant QTLs accounted for 43.8% of the total phenotypic variance. Digenic epistatic interactions were evident between two of the QTL-linked markers and two unlinked markers. Transgressive phenotypes were observed in the direction of cold sensitivity. The results indicate that low temperature germination of tomato seed can be improved by marker-assisted selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernatzky R, Tanksley SD: Majority of random cDNA clones correspond to single loci in the tomato genome. Mol Gen Genet 203: 8–12 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bohnert HJ, Nelson DE, Jensen RG: Adaptation to environmental stresses. Plant Cell 7: 1099–1111 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bolarin MC, Fernandez FG, Cruz V, Cuartero J: Salinity tolerance in four wild tomato species using vegetative yield-salinity response curves. J Am Soc Hort Sci 116: 286–290 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen FQ, Foolad MR: A molecular linkage map of tomato based on an interspecific cross between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. pimpinellifolium and its comparison with other molecular maps of tomato. Genomes in press (1998).

  5. Cocherham CC, Zeng ZB: Design III with marker loci. Genetics 143: 1437–1456 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cruz V, Cuartero J, Bolarin MC, Romero M: Evaluation of characters for ascertaining salt stress responses in Lycopersicon species. J Am Soc Hort Sci 115: 1000–1003 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Curatero J, Yeo AR, Flowers TJ: Selection of donors for salt-tolerance in tomato using physiological traits. New Phytol 121: 63–69 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dahal P, Bradford KJ, Jones RA: Effects of priming and endosperm integrity on seed germination rates of tomato genotypes. I. Germination at suboptimal temperature. J Exp Bot 41: 1431–1440 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  9. de Vicente MC, Tanksley SD: QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. Genetics 134: 585–596 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Vos DA, RR Hill J, Helper RW, Garwood DL: Inheritance of low temperature sprouting ability in F1 tomato crosses. J Am Soc Hort Sci 106: 352–355 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. De Vos DA, R R Hill J, Helper RW, Garwood DL: Diallel analysis of low temperature sprouting ability in tomato population evaluated in field and laboratory environments. Can J Genet Cytol 24: 787–796 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Doebley J, Stec A, Gustus C: Teosinte branchedl and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics 141: 333–346 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dudley JW: Molecular markers in plant improvement: manipulation of genes affecting quantitative traits. Crop Sci 33: 660–668 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  14. El-Sayed MN, John CA: Heritability studies of tomato emergence at different temperatures. J Am Soc Hort Sci 98: 440–443 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Falconer DS: Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Scientific and Technical, London (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B: A technique for radiolabelling fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem 132: 6–13 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Foolad MR, Arulsekar S, Becerra V, Bliss FA: A genetic map of Prunus based on an interspecific cross between peach and almond. Theor Appl Genet 91: 262–269 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Foolad MR, Arulsekar S, Rodriguez RL: Applications of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in plant genome analysis. In: OL Gamborg, Phillips GC (eds) Fundamental Methods of Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture and Laboratory Operations, pp. 281–298. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/Tokyo (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Foolad MR, Jones RA, Rodriguez RL: RAPD markers for constructing intraspecific tomato genetic maps. Plant Cell Rep 12: 293–297 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Foolad MR, Lin GY: Genetic analysis of low temperature tolerance during germination in tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. Plant Breed, 117: 171–176 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Foolad MR, Lin GY: Relationships between cold tolerance and salt tolerance during seed germination in tomato. I. Germplasm evaluation. Plant Breed, submitted (1998).

  22. Foolad MR, Stoltz T, Dervinis C, Rodriguez RL, Jones RA: Mapping QTLs conferring salt tolerance during germination in tomato by selective genotyping. Mol Breed 3: 269–277 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gehan EA: Estimating survival functions from the life table. J Chron Dis 21: 629–644 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Graham D, Patterson BR: Responses of plants to low, nonfreezing temperatures: proteins, metabolism, and acclimation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 33: 347–372 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Grandillo S, Tanksley SD: QTL analysis of horticultural traits differentiating the cultivated tomato from the closely related species Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 92: 935–951 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Grandillo S, Tanksley SD: QTL analysis of horticultural traits differentiating the cultivated tomato from the closely related species Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 92: 935–951 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kalloo G: Early blight resistance in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. transferred from L. pimpinellifolium (L.) and L. hirsutum f. glabratum Mull. Gartenbauwissenschaft 58: 238–239 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Keller E, Steffen KL: Increased chilling tolerance and altered carbon metabolism in tomato leaves following application of mechanical stress. Physiol Plant 93: 519–525 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lande R: The response to selection on major and minor mutations affecting a metrical trait. Heredity 50: 47–65 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lande R, Thompson R: Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics 124: 743–756 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lander ES, Botstein D: Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121: 185–199 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lark KG, Chase K, Adler F, Mansur LM, Orf JH: Interactions between quantitative trait loci in soybean in which trait variation at one locus is conditional upon a specific allele at another. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 4656–4660 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lee E: Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis. Wadworth, Lifetime Learning Publishers, Belmont, CA (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Leviatov S, Shoseyov O, Wolf S: Roles of different seed components in controlling tomato seed germination at low temperature. Scient Hort 56: 197–206 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Levitt L: Responses of plants to environmental stresses: Chilling, freezing and high temperature stresses. Academic Press, New York (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Li ZK, Pinson SRM, Marchetti MA, Stansel JW, Park WD: Characterization of quantitative trait loci contributing to field resistance to sheath blight (Rhizonctonia solani) in rice. Theor Appl Genet 91: 382–388 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Li ZK, Pinson SRM, Park WD, Paterson AH, Stansel JW: Epistasis for three grain yield components in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genetics 145: 453–465 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Li ZK, Pinson SRM, Stansel JW, Park WD: Identification of QTL for heading data and plant height in rice using RFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet 91: 374–381 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lincoln S, Daly M, Lander E: Constructing Genetic Maps with MAPMAKER/EXP 3.0.Whitehead Institute Technical Report (1992).

  40. Lyons JM, Graham D, Raison JK: Low Temperature Stress in Crop Plants: The Role of the Membrane. Academic Press, New York (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Martin B, Nienhuis J, King G: Restriction fragment length polymorphisms associated with water use efficiency in tomato. Science 243: 1725–1728 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Martin FW, Hepperly P: Sources of resistance to early blight, Alternaria solani, and transfer to tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. J Agric Univ Puerto Rico 71: 85–95 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mather K, Jinks JL: Biometrical Genetics. Chapman and Hall, London (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Miller J, Tanksley S: RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor Appl Genet 80: 437–448 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nelson JC: QGENE: software for marker-based genomic analysis and breeding. Mol Breed 3: 239–245 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ng TJ, Tigchelaar EC: Inheritance of low temperature seed sprouting in tomato. J Am Soc Hort Sci 98: 314–316 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Parkin KL, Marangoni A, Jackman RL, Yada RY, Stanley DW: Chilling injury. A review of possible mechanisms. J Food Biochem 13: 127–153 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Paterson AH, Damon S, Hewitt JD, Zamir D, Rabinowitch HD, Lincoln SE, Lander ES, Tanksley SD: Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and environments. Genetics 127: 181–197 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Paterson AH, De Verna JW, Lanini B, Tanksley S: Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using selected overlapping recombinant chromosomes, in an interspecies cross of tomato. Genetics 124: 735–742 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Paterson AH, Lander ES, Hewitt JD, Peterson S, Lincoln SE, Tanksley SD: Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature 335: 721–726 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Patterson BD, Paull R, Smillie RM: Chilling resistance in Lycopersicon hirsutum Humb. & Bonpl., a wild tomato with a wide altitudinal distribution. Aust J Plant Physiol 5: 609–617 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Rick CM: The role of natural hybridization in the derivatoin of cultivated tomatoes in western South America. Econ Bot 12: 346–367 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Rick CM: Potential genetic resources in tomato species: clues from observation in native habitats. In: Srb AM (ed) Genes, Enzymes, and Populations, pp. 255–269. Plenum New York (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rick CM: The potential of exotic germplasm for tomato improvement. In: Vasil, IK, Scowcroft WR, Freys KJ (eds) Plant Improvement and Somatic Cell Genetics, pp. 1–28. Academic Press, New York (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sax K: The association of size differences with seed coat pattern and pigmentation in Phaseolus vulgaris. Genetics 8: 552–560 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Scott SJ, Jones RA: Low temperature seed germination of Lycopersicon species evaluated by survival analysis. Euphytica 31: 869–883 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Scott SJ, Jones RA: Cold tolerance in tomato. I. Seed germination and early seedling growth of Lycoperscion esculentum. Physiol Plant 65: 487–492 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Scott SJ, Jones RA, Williams WA: Review of data analysis methods for seed germination Crop Sci 24: 1192–1199 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Steel RGD, Torrie JH: Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Stuber CW, Lincoln SE, Wolff DW, Helentjaris T, Lander ES: Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132: 823–839 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Tanksley SD: Mapping polygenes. Annu Rev Genet 27: 205–233 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Tanksley SD, Ganal MW, Prince JP, Vicente MCd, Bonierbale MW, Broun P, Fulton TM, giovannoni JJ, Grandillo S, Martin GB, Messeguer R, Miller JC, Miller L, Paterson AH, Pineda O, Roder MS, Wing RA, Wu W, Young ND: High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132: 1141–1160 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Tanksley SD, Grandillo S, Fulton TM, Zamir D, Eshed Y, Petiard V, Lopez J, Beck-Bunn T: Advanced backcross QTL analysis in a cross between an elite processing line of tomato and its wild relative L. pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 92: 213–224 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Tanksley SD, McCouch SR: Seed banks and molecular maps: Unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277: 1063–1066 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Tanksley SD, Rick CM: Isozyme gene linkage map of tomato: applications in genetics and breeding. Theor Appl Genet 57: 161–170 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Thoday JM: Location of polygenes. Nature 191: 368–370 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Thompson PA: Characterization of the germination responses to temperatures of vegetable crops. I. Tomatoes. Scient Hort 2: 35–54 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Vallejos CE: Genetic diversity of plants for response to low temperature and its potential use in crop plants. In:JM Lyons, Graham D, Raison JK (eds) Low-Temperature Stress in Crop Plants, pp. 473–489. Academic Press, New York/London/Sydney/Toronto (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Vallejos E, Lyons JM, Breidenbach RW, Miller MF: Characterization of a differential low-temperature growth response two species of Lycopersicon: the plastochron as a tool. Planta 159: 487–496 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Weller JI, Soller M, Brody T: Linkage analysis of quantitative traits in an interspecific cross of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum × Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium) by means of genetic markers. Genetics 118: 329–339 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foolad, M., Chen, F. & Lin, G. RFLP mapping of QTLs conferring cold tolerance during seed germination in an interspecific cross of tomato. Molecular Breeding 4, 519–529 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009648112491

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009648112491

Navigation