Skip to main content
Log in

Intelligence in the Wild: A Dispositional View of Intellectual Traits

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most accounts of intelligence are “abilities-centric.” They aim to explain intelligent behavior in terms of IQ or other measures of intellectual aptitude. However, several investigators have proposed that intelligent behavior in the wild—in everyday circumstances in which carefully framed tests do not tell people exactly what intellectual task to attempt—depends in considerable part on thinking dispositions. Definitionally, dispositions concern not what abilities people have, but how people are disposed to use those abilities. Everyday language includes a number of dispositional terms such as curiosity, open-mindedness, and skepticism. We review several dispositional constructs that researchers have investigated, sometimes under the label dispositions. The findings in trend show that dispositions are stable traits that help to explain intellectual performance over and above measures of intellectual aptitude. It is argued that a dispositional view of intelligence is warranted, and that it is an important area for continued research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bandura, A., and Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest though proximal self-motivation. J. Person. Soc. Psych. 41: 586-598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, M., and Dweck, C. (1985). Self-conceptions and motivation: Conceptions of intelli-gence, choice of achievement goals, and patterns of cognition, affect and behavior. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.

  • Baron, J. (1985). Rationality and intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. B., and Sternberg, R. S. (Eds.). (1986). Teaching thinking skills: Theory and cognition, experiential openness, and introspection. J. Prac. New York: W. H. Freeman.

  • Brody, N. (1992). Intelligence. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., and Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. J. Person. Soc. Psych. 42(1): 116-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., and Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psych. Bull. 119: 197-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, S. F., Segal, J. W., and Glaser, R. (Eds.). (1985). Thinking and Learning Skills, Vol. 2: Research and Open Questions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A. L. (1991). The School as a Home for the Mind. Palatine, IL: Skylight Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, V. C. (1969). Sex differences in expectancy of intellectual and academic reinforcement. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Achievement-Related Motives in Children. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion. Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. Am. Psych. 41: 1040-1048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, E., and Dweck, C. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. J. Person. Soc. Psych. 54: 5-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H. (1986). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron and R. S. Sternberg (Eds.). Teaching Thinking Skills. Theory and Practice (pp. 9-26). New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H. (1991). Critical thinking: A streamlined conception. Teach. Philos. 14: 5-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking dispositions: Their nature and accessibility. Inform. Log. 18: 129-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facione, N. C. (1997). Critical Thinking Assessment in Nursing Education Programs: An Aggregate Data Analysis. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facione, P. A. and Facione, N. C. (1992). The California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory (CCTDI) and the CCTDI Test Manual. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facione, P. A., Sanchez, C. A., Facione, N. C., and Gainen, J. (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking. J. Gen. Educ. 44: 1-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, E., & Dweck, C. (1985). The role of motivational processes in transfer of learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. J. Abn. Soc. Psych. 44: 329-344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in Mental Testing. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1988). Psychometric g. and mental processing speed on a semantic verification test. J. Pers. Indiv. Diff. 9(2): 243-255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kangas, J., and Bradway, K. (1971). Intelligence at middle age: A thirty-eight year follow-up. Dev. Psych. 5: 333-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W. (1990). Motivations for judging and knowing: Implications for causal attribution. In E. T. Higgins and R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), The Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundation of Social Behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 333-368). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W., and Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay inferences: Effects of impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. J. Exp. Soc. Psych. 19: 448-468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E., Bashner, R., and Chanowitz, B. (1985). Decreasing prejudice by increasing discrimination. J. Pers. Soc. Psych. 49: 113-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E., Hatem, M., Joss, J., and Howell, M. (1989). The mindful consequences of teaching uncertainty for elementary school and college students. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.

  • Langer, E., and Piper, A. (1987). The prevention of mindlessness. J. Pers. Soc. Psych. 53: 280-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R., Sheppard, J. A., McNeil, M. S., Jenkins, T. B., and Barnes, B. D. (1986). Objectivism in information utilization: Theory and measurement. J. Pers. Assess. 50: 32-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht, B. G., and Dweck, C. (1984). Determinants of academic achievement: The interaction of children's achievement orientation with skill area. Dev. Psycho. 20: 628-636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht, B. G., and Shapiro, S. H. (1982, August). Sex difference in attributions among high achievers. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

  • Nickerson, R., Perkins, D. N., and Smith, E. (1985). The Teaching of Thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N. (1995). Outsmarting IQ: The Emerging Science of Learnable Intelligence. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N., Jay, E., and Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-Palmer Qu. 39(1): 1-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. S. (1974). Psychology and Ethical Development. George Allen and Unwin; London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., and Jarvis, B. G. (1996). An individual difference perspective on assessing cognitive processes. In N. Schwartz and S. Sudman (Eds.), Answering Questions: Methodology for Determining Cognitive and Communicative Processes in Survey Research (pp. 221-257). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchhart, R. (1997). Thinking dispositions: Toward clarifying a construct. Unpublished Qualifying Paper, Harvard University Graduate School of Education, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchhart, R., and Langer, E. (1997). Teaching mathematical procedures mindfully: Exploring the conditional presentation of information in mathematics. In J. A. Dossey, J. O. Swafford, M. Parmantie, and A. E. Dossey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchhart, R., and Perkins, D. N. (2000). Life in the mindful classroom: Nurturing the disposition of mindfulness. J. Soc. Iss.

  • Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadowski, C. J., and Gulgoz, S. (1992). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the Need for Cognition Scale. Percep. Mot. Skills. 74:610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, C. A. (1993). An exploration of cognitive strategies and dispositions in relation to ego resiliency. Unpublished Masters Degree manuscript, University of California, Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, I. (1977). In praise of the cognitive emotions. Teach. Coll. Rec. 79: 171-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., and Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.) (1994). Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, J. W., Chipman, S. F., and Glaser, R. (Eds.). (1985). Thinking and Learning Skills, Vol. 1: Relating Instruction to Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiley, P. A., and Dweck, C. S. (1994). Individual differences in achievement goals among young children. Child Dev. 65: 1723-1743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1994). Dysrationalia as an intuition pump. Educ. Res. 23(4): 11-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., and West, R. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. J. Educ. Psych. 89(2): 342-357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Human Intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stipek, D. and Hoffman, J. (1980). Development of children's performance-related judgments. Child Dev. 51: 912-914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tishman, S., Jay, E., and Perkins, D. N. (1993). Thinking dispositions: From transmission to enculturation. Theory Prac. 32(3): 147-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tishman, S., Perkins, D. N., and Jay, E. (1995). The Thinking Classroom: Learning and Teaching in a Culture of Thinking. Needham, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troldahl, V. C., and Powell, F. A. (1965). A short form Dogmatism Scale for use in field studies. Soc. Forces 44: 211-214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, D. M., and Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. J. Pers. Soc. Psych. 67(6): 1049-1062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman B. J., and Schunk, D. H. (Eds.) (1989). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theory, Research and Practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perkins, D., Tishman, S., Ritchhart, R. et al. Intelligence in the Wild: A Dispositional View of Intellectual Traits. Educational Psychology Review 12, 269–293 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009031605464

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009031605464

Navigation