Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Overcoming barriers to communication between police and socially disadvantaged neighbourhoods: a critical theory of community policing

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research paper explores barriers to communication between police and residents of socially disadvantaged neighbourhoods (SDNs). Using a participant observation approach, research in a poor, high-crime, muiti-ethnic neighbourhood in Vancouver, Canada examined communication between police and neighbourhood residents. Communication problems that were apparent included one-way dialogue between police and neighbourhood residents, the inability of police to effectively communicate with minority and special needs groups, and the promulgation of community policing as a purposive rational model which obfuscates an empathetic dialogue between police and SDN residents. These communicative problems limited the success of community policing and crime prevention in this neighbourhood and perpetuated the asymmetrical relations between many residents and the police. Indeed, traditional community policing models have generally failed SDNs because they do not recognize how police communication with residents can continually reproduce an asymmetrical power relationship between the two. The infusion of Habermasian critical theory into community policing represents one means to overcome the communicative obstacles that perpetuate the asymmetrical power relations between police and SDN residents. lt does so by emphasizing a communicative action that attempts to expose and deconstruct asymmetrical social and personal power relationships and replace them with modes of communication that result in a more empathetic relationship. The communicative emphasis in a critical theory of community policing is a commitment to forward policing in SDNs as a democratic and empowering process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chief Constable, Vancouver Police Department (1994). Policy Report: Community Policing.Presented to Vancouver City Council. September.

  • City of Vancouver Planning Department (1994). Mount Pleasant: Community Profile.No. 13 in a Series of 23. Vancouver: City of Vancouver Planning Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R.V. and D.B. Comish (1985). "Modeling Offender's Decisions: A Framework for Policy and Research,” in Michael Tonry and Norval Morris (eds.), Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research 6.Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craib, I. (1992). Modern Social Theory: From Parsons to Habermas.New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, A. (1994). "The Partnership Approach to Community Crime Prevention: Corporatism at the Local Level?” Social & Legal Studies3(4): 497-519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowds, L. and P. Mayhew (1994). "Participation in Neighborhood Watch: Findings From the 1992 British Crime Survey.” Home Office Research and Statistics Department: Research Findings(11, July): 1-4.

  • Einstadter, W.J. (1984). "Citizen patrols: Prevention or control.” Crime and Social Justice199-212.

  • Fagan, J. (1987). "Neighborhood Education, Mobilization, and Organization for Juvenile Crime Prevention." The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences494, November: 54-70.

  • Forester, J. (1982). "Planning in the Face of Power." Journal of the American Planning Association48: 67-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J. (1985). Critical Theory and Public Life.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the Face of Power.Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J. (1993). Critical Theory, Public Policy and Planning Practice: Toward a Critical Pragmatism.Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst, M.L. and G. Basemore (1986). "Community Responses to Crime." Journal of California Law Enforcement20(3): 100-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, F.J. and T.W. Mangione (1986). "A Three-Pronged Approach to Reduce Crime and Fear of Crime: the Hartord Experiment,” in D.P. Rosenbaum (ed.), Community Crime Prevention: Does It Work?Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, John (1987). Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilling, D. (1993). "Crime Prevention Discourses and the Multi-Agency Approach." International Journal of the Sociology of Law21(2): 145-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, S.W., W.M. Rohe and J.R. Williams (1982). Safe and Secure Neighborhoods: Physical Characteristics and Informal Territorial Control in High and Low Crime Neighborhoods.Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, H.T. (1993). "Community Oriented Policing in Florida." American Journal of Police12(3): 141-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1968). Towards a Rational Society.Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and Human Interests.Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1973 English Translation 1975). Legitimation Crisis.Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the Evolution of Society.Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 2: A Critique of Functionalist Reason.Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, P. (1992). “A Planner's Day: Knowledge and Action in Communicative Practice." Journal of the American Planning Association58(1): 9-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, T. (1988). “Support for Neighbourhood Watch: A British Crime Survey Analysis,” in T. Hope and M. Shaw (eds.), Communities and Crime Reduction.London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office 146-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, T. (1995). “Community Crime Prevention,” in M. Tonry and D. Farrington (eds.), Building a Safer Society: Strategic Approaches to Crime Prevention.Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 21-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homick, J.P. (1991). An Evaluation of the Neighbourhood Foot Patrol Program of Edmonton Police Service.Ottawa: Solicitor General Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, R.D. and T. Barker (1993). “B.S. and Buzzwords: The New Police Operational Style." American Journal of Police12(3): 157-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavrakas, P.J. (1982). “Tear of Crime and Behavioral Restrictions in Urban and Suburban Neighborhoods." Population and Environment5: 242-264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavrakas, P.J. and L. Herz (1982). “Citizen Participation in Neighborhood Crime Prevention." Criminology20: 479-498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leighton, B. (1991). "Visions of Community Policing: Rhetoric and Reality in Canada." Canadian Journal of Criminology33(3-4): 485-522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.A., J.A. Grant and D.P. Rosenbaum (1988). The Social Construction of Reform: Community Organizations and Crime Prevention.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, B. and D. McGillis (1986). “Citywide Community Crime Prevention: An Assessment of the Seattle Program." in D.P.Rosenbaum (ed.), Community Crime Prevention: Does It Work?Beverly Hills: Sage. 46-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S.E. (1981). "Defensible Space Undefended: Social Factors in Crime Control Through Environmental Design." Urban Affairs Quarterly16(4): 397-422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalowski, R.J. (1983). "Crime Control in the 1980s: A Progressive Agenda." Crime and Social Justice20.

  • Michalowski, R.J. (1992). "Crime and justice in Socialist Cuba: What can left realists learn?” in J. Lowman and B. McLean (eds.), Realist Criminology: Crime Control and Policing in the 1990s.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mount Pleasant Citizens' Planning Committee (1989). Community Development Planfor Mount Pleasant.Vancouver: City of Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.F.W. (1976). The Illusions of Urban Man.Toronto: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Malley, P. (1992). "Risk, Power and Crime Prevention." Economy and Society21(3): 252-275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolsfsky, A.M and F. Dubow (1981). Strategies for Community Crime Prevention: Collective Responses to Crime in Urban America.Springfield, IL: Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehl, J. (1984). Evaluation of the Urban Crime Prevention Program.Washington, DC: US National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D.P., D.A. Lewis and J.A. Grant (1985). The Impact of Community Crime Prevention Programs in Chicago: Can Neighborhood Organizations Make a Difference.Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, A. (1988). "Crime, Localities and the Multi-Agency Approach." British Journal of Criminology28(4): 478-493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A.L. (1987). "Coproduction of Public and Private Safety: An Analysis of Bystander Intervention, Private Neighboring and Personal Protection." Western Political Science Quarterly40: 611-630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. (1997) Obstacles to Collective Action in Socially Disadvantaged Neighborhoods: Toward a Radical Planning Theory of Community Crime Prevention.Doctoral Dissertation. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L.W., C.H. Milton and T Kelly (1973). Team Policing: Seven Case StudiesWashington, DC: Police Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L.W. (1997). "Communities and Crime Prevention,” in L.W. Sherman et al. (eds.), Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesnt, What's Promising.A Report to the United States Congress. Prepared for the National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice 58-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W.G. (1990). Disorder and Decline: Crime and the Spiral of Decay in American Neighborhoods.New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W.G. and N.G. Maxfield (1981). Coping With Crime: Individual and Neighborhood Reactions.Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, J.H. and D.H. Bayley (1988). Community Policing: Issues and Practices Around the World.Washington, DC: US Govemment Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taub, R.P., D.G. Taylor and J. Dunham (1984). Patterns of Neighborhood Change: Race and Crime in Urban America.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. (1981). Law and Order: Arguments for Socialism.London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toch, H. and J.D. Grant (1991). Police As Problem Solvers.New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trojanowicz, R. and B. Bucqueroux (1991). Community Policing and the Challenge of Diversity.East Lansing, MI: National Center for Community Policing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S.G., C.R. Walker and J.C. McDavid (1992). The Victoria Community Police Stations: A Three Year Evaluation.Ottawa: Canadian Police College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkel, F.W. (1991). "Interaction Between Police and Minority Group Members: Victimization Through the Incorrect Interpretation of Nonverbal Behavior." International Review of Victimology2(1): 15-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youth Service Canada, Safer Neighbourhood Initiative (1996). A Security Audit of Mount Pleasant Businesses.Youth Service Canada (unpublished report): Vancouver.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. KPMG Investigation and Security Inc., Suite 3300 Commerce Court West, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5L 1B2

    Stephen R. Schneider

Authors
  1. Stephen R. Schneider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneider, S.R. Overcoming barriers to communication between police and socially disadvantaged neighbourhoods: a critical theory of community policing. Crime, Law and Social Change 30, 347–377 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008382621747

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008382621747

Keywords

Search

Navigation