Skip to main content
Log in

Under-Reporting of R&D in Small Firms: The Impact on International R&D Comparisons

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a widely recognised tendency for conventional measures of R&D activity to under-estimate the R&D investments of small companies. This arises due to small firms' emphasis on developmental rather than fundamental research, and because this activity is often informally organised. International survey evidence suggests a greater degree of formality in the organisation of R&D in German small firms. This reduces the likely degree of under-estimation of German small firms' R&D activity relative to that in the U.K. As a result, aggregate R&D figures may be under-estimating the true level by 13.9 per cent in the U.K. and 2.4 per cent in Germany. This is equivalent to around half of the historical difference between aggregate levels of business R&D in the U.K. and Germany.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ENSR, 1994, 'European Observatory for SMEs – 2nd Annual Report', European Network for SME Research, EIM, Zoetermeer, Netherlands.

  • Howells, J. R. L., 1984, 'The Location of R&D: Some Observations and Evidence from Britain', Regional Studies 18, 13–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A., 1987, 'Measuring R&D in Small Firms: How Much are We Missing?', Journal of Industrial Economics 36, 253–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A., 1989, 'Firm Size and Innovation: Observations in Dutch Manufacturing Industries', Small Business Economics, 215–222

  • Kleinknecht, A., T. P. Poot and O. N. Reijnen, 1991, 'Formal and Informal R&D and Firm Size: Survey Results from the Netherlands', in Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audretsch (eds.), Innovation and Technical Change, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 1981, The Measurement of Scientific and Technical Activities: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys of Research and Experimental Development (Frascati Manual), Paris.

  • OECD, 1992, Innovation Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data (Oslo Manual), Paris: Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, S., 1998, 'Product Innovation and Small Business Growth: A Comparison of the Strategies of German, U.K. and Irish Companies', Small Business Economics 11(1), 11–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, S. and H. Hofmann, 1993, Skills, Training and Company Competitiveness, Belfast: Northern Ireland Economic Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, S., J. H. Love, S. Dunlop, B. Ashcroft, H. Hofmann H and K. Vogler-Ludwig, 1996, 'Product Innovation and Development in U.K., German and Irish Manufacturing', NIERC/FAI, Queen's University of Belfast.

  • Rothwell, R., 1989, 'small Firms, Innovation and Industrial Change', Small Business Economics 1, 51–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Santarelli, E. and A. Sterlacchini, 1990, 'Innovation, Formal vs. Informal R&D, and Firm Size: Some Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Firms', Small Business Economics 2, 223–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, W. K., 1991, 'Firm Size and Innovation: A Comment', Small Business Economics 3, 155–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal Quince Wicksteed Ltd., 1985, The Cambridge Phenomenon, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roper, S. Under-Reporting of R&D in Small Firms: The Impact on International R&D Comparisons. Small Business Economics 12, 131–135 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008024913420

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008024913420

Keywords

Navigation