Abstract
There is a widely recognised tendency for conventional measures of R&D activity to under-estimate the R&D investments of small companies. This arises due to small firms' emphasis on developmental rather than fundamental research, and because this activity is often informally organised. International survey evidence suggests a greater degree of formality in the organisation of R&D in German small firms. This reduces the likely degree of under-estimation of German small firms' R&D activity relative to that in the U.K. As a result, aggregate R&D figures may be under-estimating the true level by 13.9 per cent in the U.K. and 2.4 per cent in Germany. This is equivalent to around half of the historical difference between aggregate levels of business R&D in the U.K. and Germany.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ENSR, 1994, 'European Observatory for SMEs – 2nd Annual Report', European Network for SME Research, EIM, Zoetermeer, Netherlands.
Howells, J. R. L., 1984, 'The Location of R&D: Some Observations and Evidence from Britain', Regional Studies 18, 13–29
Kleinknecht, A., 1987, 'Measuring R&D in Small Firms: How Much are We Missing?', Journal of Industrial Economics 36, 253–256
Kleinknecht, A., 1989, 'Firm Size and Innovation: Observations in Dutch Manufacturing Industries', Small Business Economics, 215–222
Kleinknecht, A., T. P. Poot and O. N. Reijnen, 1991, 'Formal and Informal R&D and Firm Size: Survey Results from the Netherlands', in Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audretsch (eds.), Innovation and Technical Change, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
OECD, 1981, The Measurement of Scientific and Technical Activities: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys of Research and Experimental Development (Frascati Manual), Paris.
OECD, 1992, Innovation Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data (Oslo Manual), Paris: Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.
Roper, S., 1998, 'Product Innovation and Small Business Growth: A Comparison of the Strategies of German, U.K. and Irish Companies', Small Business Economics 11(1), 11–24
Roper, S. and H. Hofmann, 1993, Skills, Training and Company Competitiveness, Belfast: Northern Ireland Economic Research Centre.
Roper, S., J. H. Love, S. Dunlop, B. Ashcroft, H. Hofmann H and K. Vogler-Ludwig, 1996, 'Product Innovation and Development in U.K., German and Irish Manufacturing', NIERC/FAI, Queen's University of Belfast.
Rothwell, R., 1989, 'small Firms, Innovation and Industrial Change', Small Business Economics 1, 51–64
Santarelli, E. and A. Sterlacchini, 1990, 'Innovation, Formal vs. Informal R&D, and Firm Size: Some Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Firms', Small Business Economics 2, 223–228
Scherer, W. K., 1991, 'Firm Size and Innovation: A Comment', Small Business Economics 3, 155–156
Segal Quince Wicksteed Ltd., 1985, The Cambridge Phenomenon, Cambridge, U.K.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roper, S. Under-Reporting of R&D in Small Firms: The Impact on International R&D Comparisons. Small Business Economics 12, 131–135 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008024913420
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008024913420