Abstract
The average fuel efficiency of new automobiles sold in the United States increased substantially from 1975 to 1981. This trend stagnated in 1981, however, and average fuel efficiency has actually fallen since 1987. Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards—the major policy tool in the United States directed at improving fuel efficiency—may have contributed to the stagnation and decline of average fuel efficiency by shifting automobile sales toward lower mileage vehicles. This paper illustrates how changes in vehicle sales act to dilute the intended effects of CAFE standards, and can actually lead to a decrease in average fuel efficiency.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Council of Economic Advisors. 1985. Impact of Japanese Automobile Voluntary Restraint Agreement. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Crandall, Robert W. 1992. “Policy Watch: Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 6(2): 171-180.
Falvey, Rodney E., Jeff Frank, Harold O. Fried, and Mark Babunovic. 1986. “Fuel Economy Standards and Automobile Prices.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (January): 31-45.
Glazer, Amihai, and Charles Lave. 1994. “How Regulations Can Succeed Where Taxes Do Not: An Examination of Automobile Fuel Efficiency.” Working paper, University of California, Irvine (August).
Greene, David L. 1990. “CAFE or Price? An Analysis of the Effects of the Federal Fuel Economy Regulations and Gasoline Price on New Car MPG, 1978–89.” The Energy Journal 11(3): 37-58.
Greene, David L. 1991. “Short-Run Pricing Strategies to Increase Corporate Average Fuel Economy.” Economic Inquiry 29(1): 101-114.
Greene, David L. 1992. “Vehicle Use and Fuel Economy: How Big is the Rebound Effect?” The Energy Journal 13(1): 117-143.
Gruenspecht, Howard K. 1982. “Differentiated Regulation: The Case of Auto Emissions Standards.” American Economic Review 72(2): 328-331.
Kleit, Andrew N. 1990. “The Effect of Annual Changes in Automobile Fuel Economy Standards.” Journal of Regulatory Economics (no. 2, June): 151-172.
Kwoka, John E. 1983. “The Limits of Market Oriented Regulatory Techniques: The Case of Automotive Fuel Economy.” Quarterly Journal of Economics (November): 695-704.
Leone, Robert A., and Thomas Parkinson. 1990. Conserving Energy: Is There a Better Way? A Study of Corporate Average Fuel Economy. (Prepared for the Association of International Automobile Manufacturers, May).
Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, James R. Markusen, and Thomas F Rutherford. 1993. “The Automobile Industry and the North American Free-Trade Agreement.” Discussion paper (93-08), Department of Economics, University of Colorado-Boulder.
Murrell, Dillard J., Karl H. Hellman, and Robert M. Heavenrich. 1993. Light-Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends Through 1993. Technical report (EPA/AA/TDG/93-01), U.S. EPA.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 1992. Automotive Fuel Economy Program, Sixteenth Annual Report to Congress.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 1994. Automotive Fuel Economy Program, Eighteenth Annual Report to Congress.
Sweeney, James L. 1979. “New Car Efficiency Standards and the Demand for Gasoline.” In Advances in the Economics of Energy Resources, edited by Robert S. Pindyck. JAI Press.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1993. Survey of Current Business. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Energy. 1993. Annual Energy Review, 1992. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Ward's Automotive Yearbook. 1991. Detroit: Ward Publishing.
Williams, Linda S., and Patricia S. Hu. 1991. Highway Vehicle MPG and Market Shares Report: Model Year 1990. Report prepared for U.S. Department of Energy (ORNL-6672, April).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thorpe, S.G. Fuel Economy Standards, New Vehicle Sales, and Average Fuel Efficiency. Journal of Regulatory Economics 11, 311–326 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007983106850
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007983106850