Skip to main content
Log in

Text comprehension strategy instruction with poor readers

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of teachingtext comprehension strategies to children with decoding andreading comprehension problems and with a poor or normallistening ability. Two experiments are reported. Four textcomprehension strategies, viz., question generation, summarizing,clarification, and predicting were taught through directinstruction and reciprocal teaching. In both experiments, effectswere measured according to a pretest – posttest – retentiontest – control group design. Dependent variables wereexperimenter-developed strategic reading and listening tests, andstandardized reading and listening comprehension tests. In thefirst experiment the subjects were 9 to 11-year-old poor readersfrom special schools for children with learning disabilities. Inthis experiment, the intervention program's texts and strategyinstructions were presented in listening settings only. Thesubjects in the second experiment were 10-year-old children fromregular elementary schools and 9 to 11-year-old children fromspecial schools. They were also poor readers but their decodingperformance was not as poor as in the subjects in experiment 1.In experiment 2, the intervention program involved textpresentations in alternating reading and listening lessons.Although in general, normal listeners performed better on allcomprehension tests than poor listeners, there were nodifferential program effects for the two listening levels. Cleareffects of both programs were found on strategic reading andlistening tests administered directly after the interventions. Inthe first experiment, maintenance test performance showedprolonged program benefits, whereas in the second experimentthese maintenance effects were blurred by unexpected gains of thecontrol groups of students, especially from regular schools.Finally, apart from some local successes, neither of the twoexperiments offered stable evidence of transfer of comprehensionstrategy training to standardized general listening and readingcomprehension tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarnoutse, C.A.J. (1988a). Directe instructie in begrijpend lezen [Direct instruction in reading comprehension]. In: A. Van der Leij & J. Hamers (eds.), Dyslexie '88 [Dyslexia '88] (pp. 105–117). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aarnoutse, C.A.J. (1988b). Begrijpend Leestest, groep 4 [Reading Comprehension Test, grade 2]. Nijmegen: Berkhout.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aarnoutse, C.A.J. (1990a). Begrijpend lezen: Hoe onderwijs je dat? [Reading comprehension: How to teach it?]. In: C. Aarnoutse & M. Voeten (eds.), Gaat en onderwijst. Liber amicorum voor Dr M.J.C. Mommers [Go and teach. Liber amicorum for Dr M.J.C. Mommers] (pp. 25–43). Tilburg: Zwijsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aarnoutse, C.A.J. (1990b). Begrijpend Leestest, groep 6 [Reading Comprehension Test, grade 4]. Nijmegen: Berkhout.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aarnoutse, C.A.J. (1994). Reading comprehension: Where is it and how can we improve it? In: E.M.H. Assink (ed.), Literacy acquisition and social context (pp. 176–198). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aarnoutse, C.A.J. & Van Leeuwe, J.F.J. (1986). Een verkennend onderzoek naar factoren die een rol spelen bij de verklaring van verschillen in begrijpend lezen [An exploratory study of variables that might explain individual differences in reading comprehension], Pedagogisch Tijdschrift [Pedagogical Journal] 11: 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aarnoutse, C.A.J. & Weterings, A.C.E.M. (1991). Onderwijs en begrijpend lezen [Education and reading comprehension]. Nijmegen: Department of Educational Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaron, P.G. & Malatesha Joshi, R. (1992). Reading problems: Consultation and remediation. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand-Gruwel, S. (1995). Onderwijs in tekstbegrip [Teaching reading comprehension]. Ubbergen: Tandem Felix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand-Gruwel, S., Aarnoutse, C. & Van den Bos, K.P. (1998). Improving text comprehension strategies in reading and listening settings, Learning and Instruction 8: 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.L. & Palincsar, A.S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In: L.B. Resnick (ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction. Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393–451). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brus, B.T. & Voeten, M.J.M. (1973). Eén-Minuut-Test. Verantwoording en handleiding [One Minute Test. Manual]. Nijmegen: Berkhout.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, R.C. (1984). Applying cognitive psychology to educational practice: The mind of the reading teacher, Annals of Dyslexia 34: 219–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, R.C. & Chambliss, M. (1988). Beyond decoding: Pictures of expository prose, Annals of Dyslexia 38: 243–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciborowski, J. (1992). Textbooks and the students who can't read them. New York: Brookline Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danks, J.H. & End, L.J. (1987). Processing strategies for reading and listening. In: R. Horowitz & S.J. Samuels (eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 271–294). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dole, J.A., Duffy, G.G., Roehler, L.R. & Pearson, P.D. (1991). Moving from old to new: Research on reading comprehension instruction, Review of Educational Research 61: 239–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, G.G. & Roehler, L. (1987). Improving classroom reading instruction through the use of responsive elaboration, The Reading Teacher 40: 514–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkin, D. (1978–1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction, Reading Research Quarterly 16: 515–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Albex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilroy, A. & Moore, D.W. (1988). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities with ten primary school girls, Educational Psychology 8: 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P.B. & Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability, Remedial and Special Education 7: 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruwel, S. & Aarnoutse, C. (1995a). Luisteren: vier vaardigheden [Strategic Listening Test]. Nijmegen: Berkhout.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruwel, S. & Aarnoutse, C. (1995b). Lezen: vier vaardigheden [Strategic Reading Test]. Nijmegen: Berkhout.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruwel, S. & Aarnoutse, C. (1995c). Begrijpend leestest vier vaardigheden [Strategic Reading Test]. Nijmegen: Berkhout.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruwel, S. & Aarnoutse, C. (1995d). Begrijpend luistertest vier vaardigheden [Strategic Listening Test]. Nijmegen: Berkhout.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruwel, S., Aarnoutse, C. & Van den Bos, K. (1995a). Luisteren met begrip. Programma bestemd voor leerlingen van het speciaal onderwijs [Listening Comprehension Program]. Nijmegen: Berkhout.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruwel, S., Aarnoutse, C. & Van den Bos, K. (1995b). Elkaar onderwijzen in begrijpend lezen en luisteren [Reading and Listening Program]. Nijmegen: Berkhout.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, W.E. & Gough, P. (1990). The simple view of reading, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2: 127–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C. (1994). Learning to read and write in one elementary school. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M., Moore, D.W. & Tuck, B.F. (1994). Reciprocal teaching in a regular primary school classroom, Journal of Educational Research 88: 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krom, R.S.H. (1994). Luisteren 2, Leerlingvolgsysteem [Listening Comprehension Test]. Arnhem: CITO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysynchuk, L.M., Pressley, M. & Vye, N.J. (1990). Reciprocal teaching improves standardized reading comprehension performance in poor readers, The Elementary School Journal 90: 469–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysynchuk, L.M., Pressley, M., d'Ailly, H., Smith, M. & Cake, H. (1989). A methodological analysis of experimental studies of comprehension strategy instruction, Reading Research Quarterly 24: 458–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C.D., Miller, H.F. & Rosen, L.A. (1988). Modified reciprocal teaching in a regular classroom, The Journal of Experimental Education 56: 183–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, T. (1994). At the cutting edge. Recent research on learning to read and spell. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A.S. & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension monitoring activities, Cognition and Instruction 1: 117–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A.S. & Brown, A.L. (1987). Enhancing instructional time through attention to metacognition, Journal of Learning Disabilities 20: 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A.S. & Englert, C.S. (1988). Teaching learning disabled students to read. In: D.K. Reid (ed.), Teaching the learning disabled (pp. 190–214). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S.G. & Myers, M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring, memory, and study strategies of good and poor readers, Journal of Reading Behavior 13: 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S.G., Wasik, B.A. & Turner, J.C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In: R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal & P.D. Pearson (eds.), Handbook of reading research, vol. 2 (pp. 815–860). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P.D. & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In: R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal & P.D. Pearson (eds.), Handbook of reading research, vol. 2 (pp. 609–640). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Harrix, K.R. & Marks, M.B. (1992). But good strategy instructors are constructivists! Educational Psychology Review 4: 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma, P. (1994). Instructional approaches to problems in reading comprehension of dyslexics. In: K.P. van den Bos, L.S. Siegel, D.J. Bakker & D.L. Share (eds.), Current directions in dyslexia research (pp. 269–286). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehler, L.R. & Duffy, G.G. (1991). Teachers' instructional actions. In: R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal & P.D. Pearson (eds.), Handbook of reading research, vol. 2 (pp. 861–884). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B. & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research, Review of Educational Research 64: 479–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sliepen, S.E. & Reitsma, P. (1993). Training van lom-leerkrachten in directe instructie van begrijpend leesstrategieën [Training teachers from special elementary schools in using direct instruction of reading comprehension strategies], Pedagogische Studiën [Pedagogical Studies] 70: 420–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the development of reading fluency, Reading Research Quarterly 21: 360–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sticht, T.G. (1979). Applications of the audread model to reading evaluation and instruction. In: L.B. Resnick & P.A. Weaver (eds.), Theory and practice of early reading (pp. 209–226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sticht, T.G. & James, J.H. (1984). Listening and reading. In: P.D. Pearson (ed.), Handbook of reading research, vol. 1 (pp. 293–318). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sticht, T.G., Beck, L.J., Hauke, R.N., Kleinman, G.M. & James, J.H. (1974). Auding and reading. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunmer, W.E. & Hoover, W.A. (1993). Components of variance models of language-related factors in reading disability: A conceptual overview. In: R.M. Joshi & C.K. Leong (eds.), Reading disabilities: Diagnosis and component processes (pp. 135–173). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Bos, K.P. (1989). Relationship between cognitive development, decoding skill, and reading comprehension in learning disabled Dutch children. In: P.G. Aaron & R.M. Joshi (eds.), Reading and writing disorders in different orthographic systems (pp. 75–86). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Bos, K.P. (1990). Individual differences in reading comprehension. In: P. Reitsma & L. Verhoeven (eds.), Acquisition of reading in Dutch (pp. 91–104). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Bos, K.P. (1991). De definiëring van dyslexie volgens een eenvoudig leesmodel [Defining the concept of dyslexia by the simple view of reading model]. In: K.P. van den Bos & H. Nakken (eds.), Dyslexie '91 [Dyslexia '91] (pp. 23–41). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Bos, K.P. & Spelberg, H.C.L. (1993). Reading comprehension and related skills in 9-year-old normal and poor readers. In: R. Malatesha Joshi & C.K. Leong (eds.), Reading disabilities: Diagnosis and component processes (pp. 319–334). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, S. (1992). Effectieve instructie volgens het directe instructiemodel [Effective instruction according to the direct instruction model], Pedagogische Studiën [Pedagogical Studies] 69: 242–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walraven, A.M.A., Reitsma, P. & Kappers, E.J. (1993). Instructie in strategieën voor begrijpend lezen aan zwakke lezers [Instruction in reading comprehension strategies to poor readers], Pedagogische Studiën [Pedagogical Studies] 70: 298–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weterings, A.C.E.M. & Aarnoutse, C.A.J. (1986). De praktijk van het onderwijs in begrijpend lezen [Reading comprehension practices], Pedagogische Studiën [Pedagogical Studies] 63: 387–401.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Den Bos, K.P., Brand-Gruwel, S. & Aarnoutse, C.A. Text comprehension strategy instruction with poor readers. Reading and Writing 10, 471–498 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007976225000

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007976225000

Navigation