Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Willingness to Pay for Health Protection: Inadequate Sensitivity to Probability?

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Efficient investments in health protection require valid estimates of the public's willingness to forgo consumption for diminished probabilities of death, injury, and disease. Stated valuations of risk reduction are not valid measures of economic preference if the valuations are insensitive to probability variation. This article reviews the existing literature on CV studies of reductions in health risk and finds that most studies are poorly designed to assess the sensitivity of stated valuations to changes in risk magnitude. Replication of a recent study published in this journal by Johannesson et al. (1997) demonstrates how serious the problem of insensitivity can be, even for a study that reports plausible results. New empirical results are presented from telephone surveys designed to provide internal and external tests of how WTP responds to size of risk reduction. The effect of variations in instrument design on estimated sensitivity to magnitude is examined. Overall, estimated WTP for risk reduction is inadequately sensitive to the difference in probability, that is, the magnitude of the difference in WTP for different reductions in risk is typically smaller than suggested by standard economic theory. Additional research to improve methods for communicating changes in risk is needed, and future studies of stated WTP to reduce risk should include rigorous validity checks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acton, J. (1973). Ev aluating Public Programs to Sav e Liv es: The Case of Heart Attacks. R-950-RC, RAND, Santa Monica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altaf, M. A., and J. R. DeShazo. (1994). ''Bid Elicitation in the Contingent Valuation Method: The Double Referendum Format and Induced Strategic Behavior,'' working paper, Harvard University Urban Planning Committee.

  • Anand, P. (1993). Foundations of Rational Choice Under Risk. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appel, L. J., E. P. Steinberg, N. R. Powe, G. F. Anderson, S. A. Dwyer, and R. R. Faden. (1990). ''Risk Reduction from Low Osmolality Contrast Media: What Do Patients Think Its Worth?'' Medical Care 28, 324–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. (1997). ''Biases in the Quantitative Measurement of Values for Public Decisions,'' Psychological Bulletin 122, 72–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. (1997). ''Confusion of Relative and Absolute Risk in Valuation,'' Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 14, 301–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J., and J. Greene. (1996). ''Determinants of Insensitivity to Quantity in Valuation of Public Goods: Contribution, Warm Glow, Budget Constraints, Availability, and Prominence,'' Journal of Experimental Psychology, Applied 2, 107–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. E., H. Raiffa, and A. Tversky (Eds.) (1998). Decision Making: Descripti®e, Normati®e, and Prescripti®e Interactions. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzby, J., R. Ready, and J. Skees. (1995). ''Contingent Valuation in Food Policy Analysis: A Case Study of a Pesticide-Residue Risk Reduction,'' Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 27(2), 613–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, T. A., and J. Quiggin. (1994). ''Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a 'Dichotomous Choice with Follow-up' Questionnaire,'' Journal of En®ironmental Economics and Management 27, 218–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. T. (1995). ''Contingent Valuation Surveys and Tests of Insensitivity to Scope,'' Discussion Paper 95–05, Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J., and W. M. Hanemann. (1995). ''Referendum Contingent Valuation: How Many Bounds Are Enough?'' paper presented at annual American Agricultural Economics Association meeting, San Diego.

  • Desvousges, W. H., F. R. Johnson, R. W. Dunford, K. J. Boyle, S. P. Hudson, and K. N. Wilson. (1993). ''Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability,'' 91–164 in Hausman, J. A. ed., Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

  • Dickie, M., S. Gerking, and M. Agee. (1991). ''Health Benefits of PMP Control: The Case of Stratospheric Ozone Depletion and Skin Damage Risks,'' in J. Opschoor and D. Pearce (eds.), Persistent Pollutants, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastaugh, S. R. (1991). ''Valuation of the Benefits of Risk-Free Blood: Willingness to Pay for Hemoglobin Solutions,'' International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 7, 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eom, Y. S. (1992). ''Consumers Respond to Information about Pesticide Residues,'' Food Rev iew 15, 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eom, Y. S. (1994). ''Pesticide Residue Risk and Food Safety Valuation: A Random Utility Approach,'' American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76, 760–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. W. (1979). ''Willingness to Pay for Probabilistic Improvements in Health Status: A Psychological Perspective,'' pp. 167–200 in S. F. Mushkin, D. W. Dunlop eds., Health: What Is It Worth?, Pergamon, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (1993). ''Value Elicitation: Is There Anything in There?'' pp. 187–214 in M. Hechter, L. Nadel and R. E. Michold eds., The Origin of Values, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick S., Fischhoff, B. (1998). ''Scope In Sensitivity in Elicited Valuations,'' Risk, Decision and Policy 3, 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gegax, D., S. Gerking, and W. Schulze. (1991). ''Perceived Risk and the Marginal Value of Safety,'' Rev iew of Economics and Statistics 73, 589–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerking, S., M. De Haan, W. Schulze. (1988). ''The Marginal Value of Job Safety: A Contingent Valuation Study,'' Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1,185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt, J. K. (1990). ''Risk Perceptions and Food Choice: An Exploratory Analysis of Organic-Versus Conventional-Produce Buyers,'' Risk Analysis 10, 367–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W. M., J. Loomis, and B. Kanninen. (1991). ''Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation,'' American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73, 1255–1261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D. J., J. F. Shogren, S. Y. Shin, and J. B. Kliebenstein. (1995). ''Valuing Food Safety in Experimental Auction Markets,'' American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77, 40–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herriges, J. A., and J. F. Shogren. (1996). ''Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-up Questioning,'' Journal of Env ironmental Economics and Management 30, 112–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannesson, M., and B. Jonsson. (1991). ''Willingness to Pay for Antihypertensive Therapy Results of a Swedish Pilot Study,'' Journal of Health Economics 10, 461–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannesson, M., P.-O. Johansson, and R. O'Conor. (1996). ''The Value of Private Safety Versus the Value of Public Safety,'' Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 13, 263–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannesson, M., P.-O. Johansson, and K.-G. Lofgren. (1997). ''On the Value of Changes in Life Expectancy: Blips Versus Parametric Changes,'' Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 15, 221–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannesson, M., P.-O. Johansson, B. Kristrom, and U.-G. Gerdtham. (1993). ''Willingness to Pay for Antihypertensive Therapy-Further Results,'' Journal of Health Economics 12, 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Lee, M. (1974). ''The Value of Changes in the Probability of Death or Injury,'' Journal of Political Economy 82, 835–849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Lee, M. W. (1976). The Value of Life: An Economic Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Lee, M., M. Hammerton, and P. Philips. (1985). ''The Value of Safety: Results of a National Survey,'' The Economic Journal 95, 49–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Lee, M., G. Loomes, and P. Philips. (1995). ''Valuing the Prevention of Non-Fatal Road Injuries: Contingent Valuation Versus Standard Gambles,'' Oxford Economic Papers 47: 676–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., A. Tversky, (1973). ''On the Psychology of Prediction,'' Psychology Rev iew 80, 237–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kartman, B., F. Andersson, and M. Johannesson. (1996). ''Willingness to Pay for Reductions in Angina Pectoris Attacks,'' Medical Decision Making, 16, 248–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenkel, D. (1997). ''On Valuing Morbidity, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, and Being Rude,'' Journal of Health Economics 16, 749–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidholm, K. (1995). ''Assessing the Value of Traffic Safety Using the Contingent Valuation Technique: The Danish Survey,'' in N. Schwab Christie and N. Soguel (eds.), Contingent Valuation, Transport Safety, and the Value of Life, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krupnick, A., and M. Cropper. (1992). ''The Effect of Information on Health Risk Valuations,'' Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanoie, P., C. Pedro, and R. Latour. (1995). ''The Value of a Statistical Life: A Comparison of Two Approaches,'' Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 10, 235–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., B. Liljas, P. Neumann, M. Weinstein, and M. Johannesson. (1998). ''The Impact of Risk Information on Patients' Willingness to Pay for Autologous Blood Donation,'' Medical Care 36, 1162–1173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C.-Z., and L. Mattson. (1995). ''Discrete Choice under Preference Uncertainty: An Improved Structural Model for Contingent Valuation,'' Journal of En®ironmental Economics and Management 28, 256–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.-T. J., and J. W. Milon. (1995). ''Contingent Valuation of Health Risk Reductions for Shellfish Products,'' pp. 83–114 in Caswell, J. A. ed. Valuing Food Safety and Nutrition, Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J. B., and P. duVair. (1993). ''Evaluating the Effect of Alternative Risk Communication Devices on Willingness to Pay: Results from a Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Experiment,'' Land Economics 69, 287–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M. J. (1987). ''Choice under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved,'' Journal of Economic Perspectiv es 1, 121–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniels, T. L. (1988). ''Comparing Expressed and Revealed Preferences for Risk Reduction: Different Hazards and Question Frames,'' Risk Analysis 8, 593–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniels, T. L. (1992). ''Reference Points, Loss Aversion, and Contingent Values for Auto Safety, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D., and G. Leonard. (1993). ''Issues in the Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods: Methodologies for Data Collection and Analysis,'' pp. 165–208 in Hausman, J. A. ed., Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, A., and T. J. Reutzel. (1984). ''Willingness to Pay for Reduction in Fatality Risk: An Exploratory Survey,'' American Journal of Public Health 74, 808–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Conor, R. M., and G. C. Blomquist. (1997). ''Measurement of Consumer-Patient Preferences Using a Hybrid Contingent Valuation Method,'' Journal of Health Economics 16, 667–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, M. V. (1995). ''Valuing Health Care Benefits in Money Terms,'' pp. 99–124 in Sloan, F. ed., Valuing Health Care: Costs, Benefits, and Effectiv eness of Pharmaceuticals and Other Medical Technologies, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, U., and M. Cedervall. (1991). ''The Value of Risk Reduction: Results of a Swedish Sample Survey,'' IHE Working Paper 6.

  • Pratt, J. W., and R. J. Zeckhauser. (1996). ''Willingness to Pay and the Distribution of Risk and Wealth,'' Journal of Political Economy 104, 747–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ready, R. C., J. C. Whitehead, and G. C. Blomquist. (1995). ''Contingent Valuation when Respondents Are Ambivalent,'' Journal of Env ironmental Economics and Management 29, 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, L. S. (1977). ''Car Crashes: Perceived Vulnerability and Willingness to Pay for Crash Protection,'' Journal of Community Health 3, 136–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shogren, J. F., S. Y. Shin, D. J. Hayes, and J. B. Kliebenstein. (1994). ''Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept,'' American Economic Rev iew 84, 255–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K. (1992). ''Environmental Risk Perception and Valuation: Conventional Versus Prospective Reference Theory,'' pp. 23–56 in D. W. Bromley and K. Segerson eds., The Social Response to Env ironmental Risk: Policy Formulation in the Age of Uncertainty, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K., and W. H. Desvousges. (1987). ''An Empirical Analysis of the Economic Value of Risk Changes,'' Journal of Political Economy 95, 89–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K., and W. H. Desvousges. (1988). ''Risk Perception, Learning, and Individual Behavior,'' American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70, 1113–1117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K., and W. H. Desvousges. (1990). ''Risk Communication and the Value of Information: Radon as a Case Study,'' Rev iew of Economics and Statistics 10, 137–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K., W. K. Desvouges, and F. R. Johnson. (1988). ''Learning about Radon's Risk,'' Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1, 233–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K., W. H. Desvouges, F. R. Johnson, and A. Fisher. (1990). ''Can Public Information Programs Affect Risk Perceptions,'' Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 9, 41–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K., and F. R. Johnson. (1988). ''How Do Risk Perceptions Respond to Information? The Case of Radon,'' Rev iew of Economics and Statistics 70, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K., and L. L. Osborne. (1996). ''Do Contingent Valuation Estimates Pass a Scope Test? A Meta-analysis,'' Journal of En®ironmental Economics and Management, 31, 287–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. S., J. L. Read, and M. Liang. (1984). ''Feasibility of Willingness-to-Pay Measurement in Chronic Arthritis, Medical Decision Making 4, 195–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolley, G., D. Kenkel, and R. Fabian, (eds.). (1994). Valuing Health for Policy: An Economic Approach, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. (1979). ''Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,'' Econometrica 47, 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. (1981). ''The Framing of Decisions and the Rationality of Choice,'' Science 211, 453–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ravenswaay, E., and J. Hoehn. (1991). ''Contingent Valuation and Food Safety: The Case of Pesticide Residues on Food,'' Staff Paper No. 91–13, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K. (1979). Employment Hazards: An In®estigation of Market Performance, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K. (1985). ''A Bayesian Perspective on Biases in Risk Perception,'' Economic Letters 17, 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K. (1989). ''Prospective Reference Theory: Toward an Explanation of the Paradoxes,'' Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2, 235–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K. (1993). ''The Value of Risks to Life and Health,'' Journal of Economic Literature 31, 1912–1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K., W. Magat, and J. Huber. (1987). ''An Investigation of the Rationality of Consumer Valuations of Multiple Health Risk,'' RAND Journal of Economics 18, 465–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. K., W. Magat, and J. Huber. (1991). ''Pricing Environmental Health Risks: A Survey Assessment of Risk-Risk and Risk-Dollar Trade-offs for Chronic Bronchitis,'' Journal of En®ironmenta Economics and Management 21, 32–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M. C., D. S. Shepard, and J. S. Pliskin. (1980). ''The Economic Value of Changing Mortality Probabilities: A Decision-Theoretic Approach,'' Quarterly Journal of Economics 94, 373–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeckhauser, R. J., and W. K. Viscusi. (1990). ''Risk Within Reason,'' Science 238, 559–564.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Risk Analysis, Harvard School of Public Health, 718 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA, 02115

    James K. Hammitt & John D. Graham

Authors
  1. James K. Hammitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John D. Graham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammitt, J.K., Graham, J.D. Willingness to Pay for Health Protection: Inadequate Sensitivity to Probability?. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 18, 33–62 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007760327375

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007760327375

Search

Navigation