Skip to main content
Log in

Being-in-the-World and the Horizons of Learning: Heidegger, Wittgenstein, and Cognition

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The work of Heidegger and Wittgenstein still influences research and development in such areas as sociology of science, cognitive science, and design of computer-based work environments. The purpose of this article is to show how the writings of Heidegger and Wittgenstein can be used to: (a) throw new light on studies of real-time learning in school science, (b) understand the situated nature of cognition during science activities, and (c) inform the design of new learning environments. Two case studies are used to illustrate the fruitfulness of such an approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (1992). Enacting design for the workplace. In P.S. Adler & T. A. Winograd (Eds.), Usability: Turning technologies into tools (pp. 164–197). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, D. (1991). Vision, instruction, and action. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H.L. (1991). Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger's being and time, division I. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H.L. (1992). What computers still can't do: A critique of artificial reason. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies, similes and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R. (in press). Conceptual change in science education. In M. Carretero, W. Schnotz, & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Conceptual change. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Duit, R., & Komorek, M. (in press). Understanding the basic ideas of chaos theory in a study of limited predictability.

  • Ehn, P. (1992). Scandinavian design: On participation and skill. In P.S. Adier & T.A. Winograd (Eds.), Usability: Turning technologies into tools (pp. 96–132). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S., Duit, R., & Thiele, R. (1995). Teaching science with analogies: A strategy for constructing knowledge. In S. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice (pp. 247–273). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977). Sein und zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1978). Wegmarken (2nd ed.). Frankfurt: Klosterman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, M.K., Roth, W.-M., Doutonné, S., & Woszczyna, C. (1995). The transformation of individual and collective knowledge in elementary science classrooms that are organized as knowledge-building communities. Research in Science Education, 25(2), 163–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1991). Essays on Heidegger and others: Philosophical papers, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (1996a). Art and artifact of children's designing: A situated cognition perspective. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(2), 129–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (1996b). Thinking with hands, eyes, and signs: Multimodal science talk in a grade 6/7 unit on simple machines. Interactive Learning Environments, 4(2), 170–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M.K. (1996). Differential participation during science conversations: The interaction of display artifacts, social configuration, and physical arrangements. In D.C. Edelson & E.A. Domeshek (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Learning Sciences (pp. 300–307), Chartlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., McRobbie, C., Lucas, K.B., & Boutonné, S. (1997). The construction of knowledge in traditional high school physics laboratories: A phenomenological analysis. Learning and Instruction, 7, 107–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L.A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1987). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roth, WM. Being-in-the-World and the Horizons of Learning: Heidegger, Wittgenstein, and Cognition. Interchange 28, 145–157 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007300905363

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007300905363

Navigation