Skip to main content
Log in

Results of an Efficacy-Finding Study (EFS) with the Computer-Thermometer Cyclotest 2 Plus Containing 207 Cycles

  • Published:
Advances in Contraception

Abstract

Prospectively collected cycles of 207 women were used to find out the efficacy of the Cyclotest 2 plus algorithm in detecting the fertile time in a woman's cycle. The results of the device were compared with the beginning and the end of the fertile time identified by the symptothermal method (STM) of natural family planning (NFP). It was found that the algorithm led to dangerous reduction of the fertile time (FT) in only 2 out of 207 woman cycles (0.96%). However, at the end of fertile time (FE) the device requested more abstinence than was necessary in about 12% of the cycles. We feel that more research should be performed on detecting the end of the fertile time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freundl G, Frank-Herrmann P, Gnoth C. Rhythm and devices. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health. 1998;3.

  2. Arbeitsgruppe NFP. Natürlich und sicher. München: Ehrenwirth Verlag; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Freundl G, Bonnar J, Flynn AM, Frank-Herrmann P, Kirkman R, Snowden R. Effektivität cines neuen Verhütungscomputers “PERSONA” Bericht über Testergebnisse in Deutschland. Fortschritte in der Medizin, Originalien 1998; 1/1198:25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weinberg CR, Gladen BC, Wilcox AJ. Models relating the timing of intercourse to the probability of conception and the sex of the baby. Biometrics. 1994;50:358–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonnar J, Collins W, Freundl G, May K, Snowden R, Senior S. Natural Contraception through Personal Hormone Monitoring. Unipath Publications; 1996.

  6. Moreno JE, Khan DF, Goldzieher JW. Natural family planning: suitability of the CUE method for defining the time of ovulation. Contraception. 1997;55:233–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Freundl G, Bremme M, Frank H-P, Baur S, Godehardt E, Sottong U. The CUE fertility monitor compared to ultrasound and LH peak measurements for fertile time ovulation detection. Adv Contracept. 1996;12:111–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Loewit K, Hoppichler F, Ledermuller G, Widhalm G. Ovulation prediction from cyclic changes in salivary electrical conductivity [letter]. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:708–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Freundl G, Baur S, Bremme M et al. Temperaturcomputer zur Bestimmung der fertilen Zeit im Zyklus der Frau: Babycomp, Bioself 110, Cyclotest D. Fertilität. 1992;8:66–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freundl, G., Frank-Herrmann, P. & Bremme, M. Results of an Efficacy-Finding Study (EFS) with the Computer-Thermometer Cyclotest 2 Plus Containing 207 Cycles. Advances in Contraception 14, 201–207 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006624818151

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006624818151

Keywords

Navigation