Abstract
In this paper we present an analysis of question formation couched in an optimality-theoretic framework. Particular attention will be paid to the typology of multiple questions. It will be argued that this typology can be derived from the reranking of two constraints on question formation and a condition disfavoring movement. The discussion is mainly based on English, Bulgarian, Czech and Chinese/Japanese, which instantiate four basic patterns of multiple question formation. Some specific problems posed by French and Irish are also addressed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackema, Peter: 1995, Syntax Below Zero, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.
Ackema, Peter, Ad Neeleman and Fred Weerman: 1993, ‘Deriving Functional Projections’, in A. Schafer (ed.), Proceedings of NELS 23, GLSA, Amherst, pp. 17–31.
Al, Bernard: 1975, La notion de grammaticalité en grammaire générative transformationelle: Etude générale et application à la syntaxe de l'interrogation en français parlé, Leiden University Press, Leiden.
Aoun, Joseph and Yen-hui Audrey Li: 1993, ‘Wh-elements in situ: Syntax or LF?’, Linguistic Inquiry 24, 199–238.
Baker, C. L.: 1970, ‘Note on the Description of English Questions: The Role of an Abstract Question Morpheme’, Foundations of Language 6, 197–219.
Baković, Eric: 1995, ‘Optimality and Inversion in Spanish’, unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University. To appear in P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. J. McGinnis and D. Pesetsky (eds.), Is the Best Good Enough? Papers from the Workshop on Optimality in Syntax, MIT Press and MITWPL, Cambridge.
Barss, Andrew and Howard Lasnik: 1986, ‘A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects’, Linguistic Inquiry 17, 347–354.
Battye, Adrian and Marie-Anne Hintze: 1992, The French Language Today, Routledge, London.
Billings, Loren and Catherine Rudin: 1996, ‘Optimality and Superiority: A New Approach to Multiple Wh-ordering’, in J. Toman (ed.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 4, Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor, pp. 35–60.
Butar-Butar, Maruli: 1976, Some Movement Transformations and Their Constraints in Indonesian, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Indian University.
Cheng, Lisa: 1991, On the Typology of WH-Questions, unpublished PH.D. dissertation, MIT.
Chomsky, Noam: 1986, Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Chomsky, Noam: 1995, The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik: 1977, ‘Filters and Control’, Linguistic Inquiry 8, 425–504.
Cole, Peter and Gabriella Hermon: 1994, ‘Is there LF Wh-Movement?’, Linguistic Inquiry 25, 239–262.
Collins, Chris: 1994, ‘Economy of Derivation and the Generalized Proper Binding Condition’, Linguistic Inquiry 25, 45–61.
Cumming, Susan: 1988, Grammatical Function and Word Order Change in Malay, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Dikken, Marcel den: 1995, Particles, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Epstein, Samuel David: 1992, ‘Derivational Constraints on A'-Chain Formation’, Linguistic Inquiry 23, 235–259.
Fox, Danny: 1995, ‘Economy and Scope’, Natural Language Semantics 3, 283–341.
Friedemann, Marc-Ariel: 1991, ‘On the D-Structure Position of Subjects in French’, in S. Barbiers, M. den Dikken and C. Levelt (eds.), LCJL 3 Proceedings, Leiden University, Leiden, pp. 155–168.
Golan, Yael: 1993, ‘Node Crossing Economy, Superiority and D-Linking’, unpublished manuscript, Tel Aviv University.
Grewendorf, Günther and Joachim Sabel: 1996, ‘Multiple Specifiers and the Theory of Adjunction: On Scrambling in German and Japanese’, Sprachwissenschaft in Frankfurt Arbeitspapier nr. 16, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main.
Grimshaw, Jane: 1997, ‘Projection, Heads and Optimality’, Linguistic Inquiry 28, 373–422.
Grimshaw, Jane and Vieri Samek-Lodovici: 1995, ‘Optimal Subjects and Subject Universals’, unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University. To appear in P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. J. McGinnis and D. Pesetaky (eds.), Is the Best Good Enough? Papers from the Workshop on Optimality in Syntax, MIT Press and MITWPL, Cambridge.
Haan, Germen de: 1979, Conditions on Rules, Foris, Dordrecht.
Huang, James: 1982, Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Hulk, Aafke: 1996, ‘The Syntax of Wh-questions in Child French’, in W. Philip and F. Wijnen (eds.), Connecting Children's Language and Linguistic Theory, Amsterdam Series in Child Language Development 5, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, pp. 129–173.
Izvorski, Roumyana: 1995, ‘Wh-movement and Focus-movement in Bulgarian’, in R. Eckardt and V. van Geenhoven (eds.), console II Proceedings, Holland Academic Graphics, The Hague, pp. 54–67.
Kager, Rene: 1994, ‘Ternary Rhythm in Allgnment Theory’, unpublished manuscript, Utrecht University.
Koeneman, Olaf: 1996, ‘Flexible Syntax and Proposition Marking’, in J. Don, B. Schouten and W. Zonneveld (eds.), OTS Yearbook 1995, LEd, Utrecht, pp. 41–52.
Kraskow, Tina: 1992, ‘Multiple WH-Movement in Slavic’, The Slavic Syntax Newsletter 2, 9–10.
Kroch, Anthony: 1989, ‘Reflexes of Grammar in Patterns of Language Change’, Journal of Language Variation and Change 1, 199–244.
Larson, Richard: 1988, ‘On the Double Object Construction’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–391.
Lefebvre, Claire: 1982, ‘Qui qui vient? ou Qui vient: Voilà la question’, in C. Lefebvre (ed.), La syntaxe comparée du français standard et populaire: approches formelle et functionelle, tome 1: Langues et sociétés, Office de la langue française, Québec, pp. 47–101.
Legendre, Géraldine, Paul Smolensky and Colin Wilson: 1995, ‘When Is Less More? Faithfulness and Minimal Links in wh-Chains’, unpublished manuscript, Johns Hopkins University. To appear in P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M.J. McGinnis and D. Pesetsky (eds.), Is the Best Good Enough? Papers from the Workshop on Optimality in Syntax, MIT Press and MITWPL, Cambridge.
Mahajan, Anoop: 1990, The A/A-bar Distinction and Movement Theory, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
McCloskey, James: 1979, Transformational Syntax and Model Theoretic Semantics, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Mulders, Iris: 1996, Multiple Checking and Mirrored Specifiers: The Structure of CP, unpublished M.A. thesis, Utrecht Univesity.
Müller, Gereon: 1997, ‘Partial Wh-Movement and Optimality Theory’, The Linguistic Review 14, 249–305.
Müller, Gereon and Wolfgang Sternefeld: 1996, ‘A'-Chain Formation and Economy of Derivation’, Linguistic Inquiry 27, 480–511.
Neeleman, Ad and Fred Weerman: 1997, Flexible Syntax: A Theory of Case and Arguments, unpublished manuscript, Utrecht University.
Obenauer, Hans-Georg: 1976, Etudes de syntaxe interrogative du français: Quoi, combien, et le complémenteur, Max Niemeyer, Tübingen.
Pesetsky, David: 1982. Paths and Categories, unpublished Ph.D. dissertion, MIT.
Pesetsky, David: 1995, ‘Some Optimality Principles of Sentence Pronunciation’, unpublished manuscript MIT. To appear in P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. J. McGinnis and D. Pesetsky (eds.), Is the Best Good Enough? Papers from the Workshop on Optimality in Syntax, MIT Press and MITWPL, Cambridge.
Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky: 1993, Optimality Theory, unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University and University of Colorado, Boulder.
Reinhart, Tanya: 1994, ‘WH-in-Situ in the Framework of the Minimalist Program’, unpublished manusscript, Utrecht University.
Riemsdijk, Henk van: 1978, A Case Study in Syntactic Markedness, Peter de Ridder, Lisse.
Rizzi, Luigi: 1996, ‘Residual Verb Second and the WH-Criterion’, in A. Belletti and L. Rizzi (eds.), Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 63–90.
Rizzi, Luigi and Ian Roberts: 1989, ‘Complex Inversion in French’, Probus 1, 1–30.
Rudin, Catherine: 1986, Aspects of Bulgarian Syntax: Complementizers and WH Constructions, Slavica, Columbus, OH.
Rudin, Catherine: 1988, ‘On Multiple Questions and Multiple WH Fronting’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 445–501.
Sportiche, Dominique: 1988, ‘A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and Its Corollaries for Constituent Structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 425–449.
Takahashi, Daiko: 1993, ‘Movement of Wh-Phrases in Japanese’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11, 655–678.
Tesar, Bruce and Paul Smolensky: 1995, ‘The Learnability of Optimality Theory’, in R. Aranovich, W. Byrne, S. Preuss and M. Senturia (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, CSLI, Stanford, pp. 122–137.
Toman, Jindrich: 1986, ‘Cliticization from NPs in Czech and Comparable Phenomena in French and Italian’, in H. Borer (ed.), The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 123–145.
Wahba, Wafaa Abdel-Faheem Batran: 1984, WH-Constructions in Egyptian Arabic, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Wahba, Wafaa Abdel-Faheem Batran: 1991, ‘LF Movement in Iraqi Arabic’, in C.-T. J. Huang and R. May (eds.), Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 253–276.
Watanabe, Akira: 1992, ‘Subjacency and S-Structure Movement of WH-in-Situ’, Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1, 255–291.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ackema, P., Neeleman, A. Optimal Questions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16, 443–490 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006020702441
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006020702441