Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Questions

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we present an analysis of question formation couched in an optimality-theoretic framework. Particular attention will be paid to the typology of multiple questions. It will be argued that this typology can be derived from the reranking of two constraints on question formation and a condition disfavoring movement. The discussion is mainly based on English, Bulgarian, Czech and Chinese/Japanese, which instantiate four basic patterns of multiple question formation. Some specific problems posed by French and Irish are also addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Sabine Iatridou & Sergei Tatevosov

References

  • Ackema, Peter: 1995, Syntax Below Zero, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.

  • Ackema, Peter, Ad Neeleman and Fred Weerman: 1993, ‘Deriving Functional Projections’, in A. Schafer (ed.), Proceedings of NELS 23, GLSA, Amherst, pp. 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al, Bernard: 1975, La notion de grammaticalité en grammaire générative transformationelle: Etude générale et application à la syntaxe de l'interrogation en français parlé, Leiden University Press, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, Joseph and Yen-hui Audrey Li: 1993, ‘Wh-elements in situ: Syntax or LF?’, Linguistic Inquiry 24, 199–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. L.: 1970, ‘Note on the Description of English Questions: The Role of an Abstract Question Morpheme’, Foundations of Language 6, 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baković, Eric: 1995, ‘Optimality and Inversion in Spanish’, unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University. To appear in P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. J. McGinnis and D. Pesetsky (eds.), Is the Best Good Enough? Papers from the Workshop on Optimality in Syntax, MIT Press and MITWPL, Cambridge.

  • Barss, Andrew and Howard Lasnik: 1986, ‘A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects’, Linguistic Inquiry 17, 347–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battye, Adrian and Marie-Anne Hintze: 1992, The French Language Today, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings, Loren and Catherine Rudin: 1996, ‘Optimality and Superiority: A New Approach to Multiple Wh-ordering’, in J. Toman (ed.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 4, Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor, pp. 35–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butar-Butar, Maruli: 1976, Some Movement Transformations and Their Constraints in Indonesian, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Indian University.

  • Cheng, Lisa: 1991, On the Typology of WH-Questions, unpublished PH.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1986, Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1995, The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik: 1977, ‘Filters and Control’, Linguistic Inquiry 8, 425–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Peter and Gabriella Hermon: 1994, ‘Is there LF Wh-Movement?’, Linguistic Inquiry 25, 239–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Chris: 1994, ‘Economy of Derivation and the Generalized Proper Binding Condition’, Linguistic Inquiry 25, 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, Susan: 1988, Grammatical Function and Word Order Change in Malay, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.

  • Dikken, Marcel den: 1995, Particles, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Samuel David: 1992, ‘Derivational Constraints on A'-Chain Formation’, Linguistic Inquiry 23, 235–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Danny: 1995, ‘Economy and Scope’, Natural Language Semantics 3, 283–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedemann, Marc-Ariel: 1991, ‘On the D-Structure Position of Subjects in French’, in S. Barbiers, M. den Dikken and C. Levelt (eds.), LCJL 3 Proceedings, Leiden University, Leiden, pp. 155–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golan, Yael: 1993, ‘Node Crossing Economy, Superiority and D-Linking’, unpublished manuscript, Tel Aviv University.

  • Grewendorf, Günther and Joachim Sabel: 1996, ‘Multiple Specifiers and the Theory of Adjunction: On Scrambling in German and Japanese’, Sprachwissenschaft in Frankfurt Arbeitspapier nr. 16, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane: 1997, ‘Projection, Heads and Optimality’, Linguistic Inquiry 28, 373–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane and Vieri Samek-Lodovici: 1995, ‘Optimal Subjects and Subject Universals’, unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University. To appear in P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. J. McGinnis and D. Pesetaky (eds.), Is the Best Good Enough? Papers from the Workshop on Optimality in Syntax, MIT Press and MITWPL, Cambridge.

  • Haan, Germen de: 1979, Conditions on Rules, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, James: 1982, Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Hulk, Aafke: 1996, ‘The Syntax of Wh-questions in Child French’, in W. Philip and F. Wijnen (eds.), Connecting Children's Language and Linguistic Theory, Amsterdam Series in Child Language Development 5, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, pp. 129–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izvorski, Roumyana: 1995, ‘Wh-movement and Focus-movement in Bulgarian’, in R. Eckardt and V. van Geenhoven (eds.), console II Proceedings, Holland Academic Graphics, The Hague, pp. 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kager, Rene: 1994, ‘Ternary Rhythm in Allgnment Theory’, unpublished manuscript, Utrecht University.

  • Koeneman, Olaf: 1996, ‘Flexible Syntax and Proposition Marking’, in J. Don, B. Schouten and W. Zonneveld (eds.), OTS Yearbook 1995, LEd, Utrecht, pp. 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraskow, Tina: 1992, ‘Multiple WH-Movement in Slavic’, The Slavic Syntax Newsletter 2, 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroch, Anthony: 1989, ‘Reflexes of Grammar in Patterns of Language Change’, Journal of Language Variation and Change 1, 199–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Richard: 1988, ‘On the Double Object Construction’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, Claire: 1982, ‘Qui qui vient? ou Qui vient: Voilà la question’, in C. Lefebvre (ed.), La syntaxe comparée du français standard et populaire: approches formelle et functionelle, tome 1: Langues et sociétés, Office de la langue française, Québec, pp. 47–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, Géraldine, Paul Smolensky and Colin Wilson: 1995, ‘When Is Less More? Faithfulness and Minimal Links in wh-Chains’, unpublished manuscript, Johns Hopkins University. To appear in P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M.J. McGinnis and D. Pesetsky (eds.), Is the Best Good Enough? Papers from the Workshop on Optimality in Syntax, MIT Press and MITWPL, Cambridge.

  • Mahajan, Anoop: 1990, The A/A-bar Distinction and Movement Theory, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • McCloskey, James: 1979, Transformational Syntax and Model Theoretic Semantics, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulders, Iris: 1996, Multiple Checking and Mirrored Specifiers: The Structure of CP, unpublished M.A. thesis, Utrecht Univesity.

  • Müller, Gereon: 1997, ‘Partial Wh-Movement and Optimality Theory’, The Linguistic Review 14, 249–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Gereon and Wolfgang Sternefeld: 1996, ‘A'-Chain Formation and Economy of Derivation’, Linguistic Inquiry 27, 480–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeleman, Ad and Fred Weerman: 1997, Flexible Syntax: A Theory of Case and Arguments, unpublished manuscript, Utrecht University.

  • Obenauer, Hans-Georg: 1976, Etudes de syntaxe interrogative du français: Quoi, combien, et le complémenteur, Max Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David: 1982. Paths and Categories, unpublished Ph.D. dissertion, MIT.

  • Pesetsky, David: 1995, ‘Some Optimality Principles of Sentence Pronunciation’, unpublished manuscript MIT. To appear in P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. J. McGinnis and D. Pesetsky (eds.), Is the Best Good Enough? Papers from the Workshop on Optimality in Syntax, MIT Press and MITWPL, Cambridge.

  • Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky: 1993, Optimality Theory, unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University and University of Colorado, Boulder.

  • Reinhart, Tanya: 1994, ‘WH-in-Situ in the Framework of the Minimalist Program’, unpublished manusscript, Utrecht University.

  • Riemsdijk, Henk van: 1978, A Case Study in Syntactic Markedness, Peter de Ridder, Lisse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi: 1996, ‘Residual Verb Second and the WH-Criterion’, in A. Belletti and L. Rizzi (eds.), Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 63–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi and Ian Roberts: 1989, ‘Complex Inversion in French’, Probus 1, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudin, Catherine: 1986, Aspects of Bulgarian Syntax: Complementizers and WH Constructions, Slavica, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudin, Catherine: 1988, ‘On Multiple Questions and Multiple WH Fronting’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 445–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, Dominique: 1988, ‘A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and Its Corollaries for Constituent Structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 425–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, Daiko: 1993, ‘Movement of Wh-Phrases in Japanese’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11, 655–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesar, Bruce and Paul Smolensky: 1995, ‘The Learnability of Optimality Theory’, in R. Aranovich, W. Byrne, S. Preuss and M. Senturia (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, CSLI, Stanford, pp. 122–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toman, Jindrich: 1986, ‘Cliticization from NPs in Czech and Comparable Phenomena in French and Italian’, in H. Borer (ed.), The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahba, Wafaa Abdel-Faheem Batran: 1984, WH-Constructions in Egyptian Arabic, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

  • Wahba, Wafaa Abdel-Faheem Batran: 1991, ‘LF Movement in Iraqi Arabic’, in C.-T. J. Huang and R. May (eds.), Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 253–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Akira: 1992, ‘Subjacency and S-Structure Movement of WH-in-Situ’, Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1, 255–291.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ackema, P., Neeleman, A. Optimal Questions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16, 443–490 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006020702441

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006020702441

Keywords

Navigation