Skip to main content
Log in

Post screen-detected breast cancer within the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia

  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The histological characteristics and extent of mammographic density were compared between 170 post screen-detected (PSD) breast cancers and 466 screen-detected (SD) breast cancers in women attending the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia. In addition, methods of detection and clinical presentation for the PSD cancers were examined. Invasive ductal, comedo, and medullary carcinoma were significantly more common in PSD cancer in women under age 50 years, and invasive ductal carcinoma in women over age 50 years. Mammographic density was more common in PSD cancers for all age groups under 70 years. The majority of PSD cancers were node negative with no evidence of metastases; however, they tended to be of more advanced stage than SD cancer. Most PSD cancers regardless of age were initially found by the woman herself, presenting as a palpable mass, and the likelihood of being detected within 12 months of the last screening mammogram was higher at younger ages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frisell J, Eklund G, Helstrom L, Somell A: Analysis of interval breast carcinomas in a randomized screening trial in Stockholm. Breast Cancer Res Treat 9: 219–225, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  2. van Dijck JA, Verbeek AL, Hendriks JH, Holland R: The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program. A review of the previous mammograms of interval and screen-detected cancers. Cancer 72: 1933–1938, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ikeda DM, Anderson I, Wattsgard C, Tanzon L, Linell F: Interval carcinomas in the Malmö mammographic screening trial: radiographic appearance and prognostic considerations. A J R 159: 287–294, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burhenne HJ, Warren Burhenne L, Goldberg F, Hislop TG, Worth AJ, Rebbeck PM, Kan L: Interval breast cancer in the screening mammography program of British Columbia: analysis and classification. A J R 162: 1067–1071, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  5. Holland R, Mravunac M, Hendriks JHCL, Bekker BV: Socalled interval cancers of the breast-pathologic and radiologic analysis of sixty-four cases. Cancer 49: 2527–2533, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martin JE, Moskowitz M, Milbrath JR: Breast cancer missed by mammography. J R 132: 737–739, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  7. Warren Burhenne LJ, Burhenne HJ, Kan L: Interval Cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of BC (SMPBC): A classification and analysis based on 5 year age groupings. (Abstract), Radiology 197[p]: 273–274, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  8. Warren Burhenne LJ, Hislop TG, Burhenne HJ: The British Columbia mammography screening program: evaluation of the first 15 months. A J R 158: 45–49, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ciatto S, Zappa M: A prospective study of the value of mammographic patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk in a screening experience. Eur J Radiol 17: 122–125, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peer PGM, van Dijck JAAM, Hendriks JHCL, Holland R, Verbeek ALM: Age dependent growth rate of primary breast cancer. Cancer 71: 3547–3551, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boyd NF, Jensen HM, Cooke G, Lee Han H: Relationship between mammographic and histological risk factors for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 84: 1170–1179, 1992

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hislop, T.G., Worth, A.J., Kan, L. et al. Post screen-detected breast cancer within the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia. Breast Cancer Res Treat 42, 235–242 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005793707549

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005793707549

Navigation