Skip to main content
Log in

SECONDARY PREDICATION AND FUNCTIONAL PROJECTIONS IN FRENCH

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on the structural properties of secondary predication. It is argued, based on an analysis of French depictive and resultative secondary predicates, that secondary predicates are functional projections of the category Gender, they form constituents of their own, and they contain a PRO subject coindexed with a main subject or object. Configurationally, they are of two types: subject-oriented secondary predicates, which are adjoined to VP, and object-oriented secondary predicates, which are adjoined to VP (if resultative) or are sisters of V! (if depictive). Compared with previous analyses of secondary predication, the present one corroborates early proposals about the constituency and internal make-up of secondary predicates (Stowell 1981, 1983; Chomsky 1981). The main difference lies in the nature of the constituent itself: it is argued here that it is a functional projection, namely GenderP, a proposal which owes much to late 1980s and early 1990s explorations in the nature of syntactic categories. In particular, the present analysis leads to the proposal that Agr$_s$ and Agr$_o$ (Chomsky 1991) should, at least in languages like French, be identified as Person and Gender, respectively. The lack of productive resultative constructions in French is also addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abney, Steven Paul: 1987, The English Noun Phrase in Its Sentential Aspect, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Baker, Mark: 1988, Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belletti, Adriana: 1990, Generalized Verb Movement, Rosenberg and Sellier, Turin, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belletti, Adriana: 1994, ‘Verb Positions: Evidence from Italian’, in D. Lightfoot and N. Hornstein (eds.), Verb Movement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Judy: 1991, ‘DPs in French and Walloon: Evidence for Parametric Variation in Nominal Head Movement’, Probus 3, 101–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beukema, Frits and Teun Hoekstra: 1984, ‘Extractions from With-Constructions’, Linguistic Inquiry 15, 689–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, Denis: 1983, On the Content of Empty Categories, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Greg N.: 1977, ‘A Unified Analysis of the English Bare Plural’, Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 413–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, Jill and Janet H. Randall: 1992, ‘The Argument Structure and Syntactic Structure of Resultatives’, Linguistic Inquiry 23, 173–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1986, Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1991, ‘Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation’, in R. Freidin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 417–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1992, ‘A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory’, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1.

  • Cinque, Guglielmo: 1994, ‘On the Evidence for Partial N-Movement in the Romance DP’, in G. Cinque, J. Koster, J-Y, Pollock, L. Rizzi, and R. Zanuttini (eds.), Paths towards Universal Grammar, Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 85–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deffitto, Denis and Jan Schroten: 1991, ‘Bare Plurals and the Number Affix in DP’, Probus 3, 155–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Sciullo, Anna Maria and Edwin Williams: 1987, On the Definition of World, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David R.: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emonds, Joseph: 1978, ‘The Verbal Complex V'-V in French’, Linguistic Inquiry 9, 151–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos, Carol: 1991, ‘On A-and A'-agreement’, Lingua 85, 135–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane: 1991, ‘Extended Projection’, unpublished manuseript, Brandeis University.

  • Hoekstra, Teun: 1988, ‘Small Clause Results’, Lingua 71, 101–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, Norbert and David Lightfoot: 1987, ‘Predication and PRO’, Language 63, 23–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iatridou, Sabine: 1990, ‘About Agr(P)’, Linguistic Inquiry 21, 551–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard: 1975, French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard: 1985, ‘Accord du Participe en Français et en Italien’, Modèles Linguistiques 7, 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard: 1989, ‘Facets of Romance Past Participle Agreement’, in P. Benincá (ed.), Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, 85–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, Hilda: 1987, ‘On the Absence of Case Chains in Bambara’, unpublished manuscript, UCLA.

  • Koopman, Hilda and Dominique Sportiche: 1988, ‘Subjects’, unpublished manuscript, UCLA.

  • Kratzer, Angelika: 1989, ‘Stage-level and Individual-level Predicates’, in E. Bach, A. Kratzer, and B. Partee (eds.), Papers on Quantification, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda, S. Y.: 1988, ‘Whether We Agree or not: A Comparative Syntax of English and Japanese’, Lingvisticae Investigationes 12, 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, Géraldine: 1990, ‘French Impersonal Constructions’, NLLT 8, 81–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, Géraldine: 1994, Topics in French Syntax, Garland Publishing, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Beth and Tova Rapoport: 1988, ‘Lexical Subordination’, Proceedings of CLS 24, University of Chicago, Chicago, pp. 275–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, Donna Jo: 1989, Predication Theory: A Case Study for Indexing Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picallo, M. Carme: 1991, ‘Nominals and Nominalizations in Catalan’, Probus 3, 279–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, Jean-Yves: 1989, ‘Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, Tova R.: 1991, ‘Adjunct-predicate Licensing and D-structure’, in S. Rothstein (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 25: Perspectives on Phrase Structure, Academic Press, New York, pp. 159–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, Tova R.: 1993, ‘Verbs in Depictives and Resultatives’, in J. Pustejovsky (ed.), Semantics and the Lexicon, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 163–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, Elizabeth: 1991, ‘Two Functional Categories in Noun Phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew’, in S. Rothstein (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 25: Perspectives on Phrase Structure, Academic Press, New York, pp. 37–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi: 1990, Relativized Minimality, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Ian: 1988, ‘Predicative APs’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 703–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, Susan: 1983, The Syntactic Form of Predication, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Safir, Ken: 1983, ‘On Small Clauses as Constituents’, Linguistic Inquiry 14, 730–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speas, Margaret. 1990, Phrase Structure in Natural Language, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, Dominique: 1988, ‘A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and Its Corollaries for Constituent Structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 18, 678–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, Tim: 1981, Origins of Phrase Structure, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Stowell, Tim: 1983, ‘Subjects across Categories’, The Linguistic Review 2, 285–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmy, Leonard: 1985, ‘Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms’, in T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 57–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, Lisa: 1984, Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Travis, Lisa: 1988, ‘The Syntax of Adverbs’, in McGill Working Papers in Linguistics: Proceedings of the IVth Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valois, Daniel: 1991, ‘The Internal Syntax of DP and Adjective Placement in French and English’, in Tim Sherer (ed.), Proceedings of NELS 21, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 367–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vendler, Zeno: 1967, ‘Verbs and Times’, in Z. Vendler (ed.), Linguistics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, pp. 97–121.

  • Williams, Edwin S.: 1980, ‘Predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 11, 203–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin S.: 1983, ‘Against Small Clauses’, Linguistic Inquiry 14, 287–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanuttini, Raffaella: 1991, Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LEGENDRE, G. SECONDARY PREDICATION AND FUNCTIONAL PROJECTIONS IN FRENCH. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 15, 43–87 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005728013370

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005728013370

Keywords

Navigation