Abstract
This paper discusses the evolving institutional structure and governance of transportation planning, policy development and transit delivery within one major North American city-region, the Greater Vancouver area. Various methods of transportation governance are explored from complete independence to full regional integration. The move away from a direct provincial role in transportation management to a greater regional transit authority is discussed and critiqued.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler S & Edner S (1990) Governing and managing multimodal regional transit agencies in a multicentric era. In: Guess G (ed) Public Policy and Transit System Management(pp 89–112). Westport: Greenwood Press.
Artibise AFJ (1995) Achieving sustainability in cascadia: an emerging model of urban growth management in the Vancouver-Seattle-Portland corridor. In: Kresl PK & Gappert G (eds) North American Cities and the Global Economy(pp 221–250). Thousand Oaks, London: Sage Publications.
Baxter D (1989) Population and Housing in Metropolitan Vancouver: Changing Patterns of Demographics and Demand. Vancouver: The Laurier Institution.
British Columbia (1995) Going Places: Transportation for British Columbia. Victoria: Queen's Printer.
Costa A (1996) The organisation of urban public transport systems in western European metropolitan areas. Transportation Research A: General30: 349–359.
Ferguson E (1997) Privatization as choice probability, policy process and program outcome: the case of transportation management associations. Transportation Research A: General31: 353–364.
Francis D (1990) Transitions: One Hundred Years of Transit in British Columbia. Vancouver: BC Transit.
Frisken F (1991) The contributions of metropolitan government to the success of Toronto's public transit system: an empirical dissent from the public-choice paradigm. Urban Affairs Quarterly27: 286–292.
Gorys J, Miller G & MacQuarrie M (1998) The greater Toronto area urban structure: analysis of progress towards a preferred vision of development. Transportation Quarterly52: 11–19.
Hartgen DT, McCoy WJ & Walcott WA (1996) Incremental regionalism: staged approach to development of regional transportation organizations. Transportation Research Record1: 79–88.
Hakim S, Seidenstat P & Bowman GW (1996) Privatizing Transportation Systems. Westport Connecticut: Praeger.
Hurwitz EP (1996) Competitive contracting of metropolitan transit services in San Diego. In: Hakim S, Seidenstat P & Bowman GW (eds) Privatizing Transportation Systems. Wesport: Connecticut: Praeger.
Meyer JR & Gomez-Ibanez JA (1991) Transit bus privatization and deregulation around the world: some perspectives and lessons. International Journal of Transportation EconomicsXVIII: 231–258.
Murchie G (1995) Looking beyond Vancouver's picture postcard beauty. Plan Canada35: 9–10.
Perry JL & Babitsky TT (1986) Comparative performance in urban transit: accessing privatization strategies. Public Administration Review46: 57–66.
Raad T & Kenworthy J (1998) The US and Us: Canadian cities are going the way of their US counterparts into car-dependent sprawl. Alternatives Journal24: 14–19.
Smith RG (1987) Reorganization of regional transportation authorities to maintain urban/suburban constituency balance. Public Administration Review47: 171–179.
Ulberg CG (1990) Issues in the Shift from Regional to Local Provision of Bus Service. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Wilson NH (1991) Organizational options for public transportation in the US. Transportation Planning and Technology15: 405–414.
Wish NB (1982) Improving policy making in public transportation. Public Administration Review42: 530–545.
Wynn, G (1992) The rise of Vancouver. In: Wynn G & Oke TR (eds) Vancouver and its Region(pp 69–147). Vancouver: UBC Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meligrana, J.F. Toward regional transportation governance: a case study of Greater Vancouver. Transportation 26, 359–398 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005231322989
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005231322989