Cause and Effect At the Magnetopause

Abstract

Recent analyses of spacecraft data, especially AMPTE/IRM data, provide a test of reconnection theory; an analysis for the signature of a local tangential stress balance in a one-dimensional time-stationary rotational discontinuity has left crucial questions unanswered. A key result is that the electron temperature profile inward through the magnetopause current sheet shows heating followed by cooling. Electrons must be one of the carriers of the current; hence this result reflects the sign of E · J in the frame of reference of the magnetopause current carriers. Since the current is directed from dawn to dusk, the inescapable conclusion is that the electric field must reverse within the current sheet. This is direct evidence of a load–dynamo combination; in that dynamo, energy is transferred from the solar wind plasma to the electromagnetic field. A dynamo is not included in the reconnection model which includes only the electrical load; therefore, we argue that the reconnection problem is improperly posed. A second compelling observation is a remarkable difference of the normal component of the plasma velocity between inbound and outbound crossings. For an inbound crossing (outward current meander) this component does reverse, but not quite as assumed in the reconnection model; on the other hand, for outbound crossings of the spacecraft (corresponding to erosion) there is no reversal at all. The normal component is approximately constant at 20 km s^-1, anti-Sunward throughout. Since the typical motion of the magnetopause is 10 km s^-1 this revealing result shows that solar wind plasma can go across the magnetopause, even onto closed field lines to feed the low latitude boundary layer. This is in stark contrast to the reconnection model where the plasma goes to open field lines. The interaction can be understood by appealing to Poynting's theorem, where E · J describes the net effect on or by the plasma. Time-dependent terms (even in the initial conditions) must be used so that it is possible to draw upon energy which has been stored locally in both electrical and magnetic forms. An extended discussion of observational results from ground-based, rocket, and satellite instruments indicate the impulsive nature of the solar wind–magnetospheric interaction. There is a lot of plasma involved in this interaction, over 10²⁷ ions electrons^-1 per second; the anti-Sunward flow takes place in the low latitude boundary layer. There is no flux catastrophe produced by this flow since the frozen-field theorem does not hold for plasma transfer across the magnetopause. The LLBL completely envelops the plasma sheet; the LLBL is the source of its plasma, not the plasma mantle as hypothesized in the reconnection model of the magnetotail. A number of serious errors have occurred in some articles in the literature on reconnection, and we list and discuss the most important of these. In the conclusion it is emphasized that the failure to provide a viable energy source, within the necessary spatial and temporal constraints, is responsible for the failure of reconnection model. This does not mean that the state of interconnection between the geomagnetic field and the interplanetary magnetic field can not change, but it does mean that the advocated process is not relevant to such changes. True reconnection requires that the electric field has a curl so that an electromotive force ∈ = ∮ E · dl = -dΦ_Mdt exists through which energy can be interchanged with stored magnetic energy.