Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A spatial analysis of candidate competition in dual member districts: The 1989 Chilean senatorial elections

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study uses empirical spatial theory to evaluate candidate and voter behavior in senate elections contested during the 1989 Chilean general election. The study evaluates whether senatorial candidates competing in dual member districts under Chilean d'Hondt locate near the periphery or interior of the electoral space. Spatial analyses demonstrate the Chilean senatorial electoral system is characterized by centrifugal forces. In particular, candidates of the right locate on the periphery of the space and face few incentives to pursue moderate electoral strategies. The study also characterizes bases of party and candidate support and the underlying dimensions of political competition. Spatial analysis reveals both change and continuity in the pre- and post-authoritarian electoral universes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. and Merrill III, S. (1998a). A Downsian model of candidate competition in the 1988 French presidential election. Typescript. Santa Barbara: University of California.

  • Adams, J. and Merrill III, S. (1998b). Party structures and policy representation in multiparty elections: An application to Norwegian politics. Typescript. Santa Barbara: University of California.

  • Adams, G. (1996). Legislative effects of single-member vs. multi-member districts. American Journal of Political Science40: 129-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, J.H. and McKelvey, R.D. (1977). A method of scaling with applications to the 1968 and 1972 presidential elections. American Political Science Review71: 111-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T.W. and Amemiya, Y. (1988). The asymptotic normal distribution of estimators in factor analysis under general conditions. The Annals of Statistics16: 759-771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angell, A. (1990). The Chilean elections of 1989. Electoral Studies3: 241-245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angell, A. and Pollack, B. (1990). The Chilean elections of 1989 and the politics of the transition to democracy. Bulletin of Latin American Research9: 1-23. Black, D. (1958). Theory of committees and elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, H.E. (1991). Traits versus issues: Factor versus ideal-point analysis of candidate thermometer ratings. In J.A. Stimson (Ed.), Political Analysis, Vol. II. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, B.G. (1970). Political groups in Chile. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahoon, L.S. and Hinich, M.J. (1976). A method for locating targets using range only. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory22: 217-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahoon, L.S., Hinich, M.J. and Ordeshook, P.C. (1978). A statistical multidimensional scaling method based on the spatial theory of voting. In P.C. Wang (Ed.), Graphical representation of multivariate data. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caviedes, C.N. (1991). Elections in Chile: The road toward redemocratization. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G.W. (1987). Electoral equilibrium under alternative voting institutions. American Journal of Political Science31: 82-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G.W. (1990a). Centripetal and centrifugal incentives in electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science34: 903-935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G.W. (1990b). Multicandidate spatial competition. In J.M. Enelow and M.J. Hinich (Eds.), Advances in the spatial theory of voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S.K. (1984). A nonmetric test of spatial theories of elections. Political Methodology10: 1-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzau, A., Kats, A. and Slutsky, S. (1985). Multi-agent equilibria with market share and ranking objectives. Social Choice and Welfare2: 95-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, B.C. and Lipsey, R. (1975). The principle of minimum differentiation reconsidered: Some new developments in the theory of spatial competition. Review of Economic Studies42: 27-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endersby, J.W. and Hinich, M.J. (1992). The stability of voter perceptions: A comparison of candidate positions across time using the spatial theory of voting. Journal of Mathematical and Computer Modeling16: 67-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enelow, J.M. (1986). The linkage between predictive dimensions and candidate issue positions in American presidential elections: An examination of group based differences. Political Behavior8: 245-261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enelow, J.M. (1988). A methodology for testing a new spatial model of elections. Quality and Quantity22: 347-364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enelow, J.M. and Hinich, M.J. (1984). The spatial theory of voting: An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enelow, J.M. (1989). The locations of American presidential candidates: An empirical test of a new spatial model of elections. Mathematical and Computer Modeling12: 461-470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enelow, J.M. (1994). A test of the predictive dimensions model in spatial voting theory. Public Choice78: 155-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enelow, J.M. and Hinich, M.J. (Eds.). (1990). Advances in the spatial theory of voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faundez, J. (1988). Marxism and democracy in Chile. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garreton, M.A. (1989). The Chilean political process. Winchester, MA: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, F.G. (1966). The political system of Chile. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D.P. and Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of rational choice theoryNew Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. and Shepsle, K. (1987). The effect of multiparty rewards in multiparty competition with entry. American Political Science Review81: 525-537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. and Weber, S. (1985). Multiparty equilibria under proportional representation. American Political Science Review79: 693-703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinich, M.J. and Mungeer, M.C. (1994). Ideology and the theory of political choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinich, M.J. (1996). Analytical politics. New York: Cambridge University Press (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinich, M.J. and Ordeshook, P.C. (1970). Plurality maximization versus vote maximization: A spatial analysis with variable participation. American Political Science Review64: 772-791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, T. (1994). Political leadership and representation in West European democracies: A test of three models of voting. American Journal of Political Science38: 45-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M.P. (1993). The political consequences of electoral laws in Latin America and the Caribbean. Electoral Studies12: 59-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, K.P. and Rapoport, R. (1976). Religion and leftist mobilization in Chile. Comparative Political Studies9: 277-308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laver, M. and Schofield, N. (1990). Multiparty government. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1994). Electoral systems and party systems. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, T.-M., Chu, Y.-h. and Hinich, M.J. (1996). Conflict displacement and regime transition in Taiwan: A spatial analysis. World Politics(forthcoming).

  • Lipset, S.M. and Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage structures, party systems and voter alignments. In S.M. Lipset and S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party systems and voter alignments: Cross national perspectives. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, S.E., Listhaug, O. and Rabinowitz, G. (1991). Issues and party support in multiparty systems. American Political Science Review85: 1107-1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, S.E., Rabinowitz, G. and Listhaug, O. (1995). Political sophistication and models of issues voting. British Journal of Political Science25: 453-483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, S. III. (1994). A probabilistic model for the spatial distribution of party support in multiparty elections. Journal of the American Statistical Association1190-1197.

  • Merrill, S. III. (1995). Discriminating between the directional and proximity spatial models of electoral competition. Electoral Studies14: 273-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey, T.R. (1984). Spatial equilibrium with entry. Review of Economic Studies51: 139-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panzer, J. and Paredes, R. (1991). The role of economic issues in elections: The case of the 1988 Chilean presidential referendum. Public Choice71: 51-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, K. and Rosenthal, H. (1984). U.S. presidential elections 1968-1980: A spatial analysis. American Journal of Political Science28: 282-312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1976). Occupation and lower-class political orientation in Chile. In A. Valenzuela and J.S. Valenzuela (Eds.), Chile: Politics and society. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, G. (1978). On the nature of political issues: Insights from a spatial analysis. American Journal of Political Science70: 804-809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, G. and Macdonald, S.E. (1989). A directional theory of issue voting. American Political Science Review83: 93-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, G., Macdonald, S.E. and Listhaug, O. (1991). Old players in a new game: Party strategy in multiparty systems. Comparative Political Studies24: 147-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusk, J. and Weisberg, H. (1972). Perceptions of presidential candidates. Midwest Journal of Political Science16: 388-410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N., Martin, A., Quin, K. and Whitford, A. (1998). Multiparty electoral competition in the Netherlands and Germany: A model based on the multinomial probit. Public Choice(forthcoming).

  • Schofield, N. (1998). A comparison of majoritarian and proportional electoral systems based on spatial modeling and ‘rational’ politicians. Typescript. St. Louis: Washington University.

  • Scott, D.W. (1992). Multivariate density estimation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, T.R. (1992). Rethinking the center: Party politics in nineteenth-and twentieth-century Chile. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, T.R. (1995). Reconstructing party politics in Chile. In S. Mainwaring and T.R. Scully (Eds.), Building democratic institutionsStanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K.A. (1991). Models of multiparty electoral competition. New York: Harwood Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K.A. and Cohen, R.N. (1990). Multiparty competition, entry and entry deterrence in spatial models of elections. In J.M. Enelow and M.J. Hinich (Eds.), Advances in the spatial theory of voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taagepera, R. and Shugart, M.S. (1989). Seats and vote. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, A. (1985). Origins and characteristics of the Chilean system: A proposal for a parliamentary form of government. Working Paper No. 164, The Woodrow Wilson Center.

  • Valenzuela, S. and Valenzuela, A. (1985). Chile and the breakdown of democracy. In H.J. Wiarda and H.F. Kline (Eds.), Latin American politics and development. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, A. and Valenzuela, S. (1986). Party opposition under the authoritarian regime. In A. Valenzuela and J.S. Valenzuela (Eds.), Military rule in Chile. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, I. (1993). Political alliances and the role of the centre: The Chilean Christian Democratic Party. In A. Angell and B. Pollack (Eds.), The legacy of dictatorship. Liverpool: Institute of Latin American Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, H. and Rusk, J. (1970). Dimensions of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review64: 1167-1185.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, University of, Missouri-Columbia, 113 Professional Building, Columbia, MO, 65211, U.S.A.; e-mail

    Jay K. Dow

Authors
  1. Jay K. Dow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dow, J.K. A spatial analysis of candidate competition in dual member districts: The 1989 Chilean senatorial elections. Public Choice 97, 451–474 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005014611991

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005014611991

Keywords

Search

Navigation