Abstract
A computer-assisted video extensometer was used to measure the Young's modulus and tensile strength of commercially available alumina fibres (11.5 μm in diameter). The results showed excellent agreement with manufacturers reported values (384 ± 12 GPa and 3132 ± 296 MPa for Young's modulus and tensile strength, respectively). The machine was initially tested with 100 μm diameter SiC monofilaments to identify optimum experimental conditions. The mechanical properties of these fibres were independent of the crosshead speed and fibre length. This non-contacting extension measuring system allowed testing of fragile materials and a submicron resolution could be achieved with a high-precision CCD camera. The results in term of precision and resolution therefore meet the requirements for strain measurements in mechanical ceramic materials testing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Lewis III, in “Handbook on Continuous Fiber Reinforced Ceramic Matrix Composites,” edited by R. L. Lehman, S. K. El-Rahaiby and J. B. Wachtman (Purdue University and the American Ceramic Society, 1996).
K. K. Chawla, “Ceramic Matrix Composites” (Chapman & Hall, London, 1993).
J. B. Wachtman, “Mechanical Properties of Ceramics” (Wiley & Sons, New York, 1996).
“Strain Gauge Technology” (Measurements Group, Raleigh, NC 1993).
R. W. Dickson and J. B. Wachtman, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 75A (1971) 155.
P. C. Bastias, S. M. Kulkarni, K. Y. Kim and J. Gargas, Exp. Mech. (1996) 78.
G. Spathis and E. Kontou, J. Polym. Sci. 71 (1999) 2007.
C. G'sell, J. M. Hiver, A. Dahoun and A. Souahi, J. Mater. Sci. 27 (1992) 5031.
P. Franc¸ ois, V. Gaucher and R. Seguela, J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 6 (1994) 8959.
R. A. Shatwell, Mater. Sci. and Technol. 10 (1994) 552.
D. M. Wilson, J. Mater. Sci. 32 (1997) 2535.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coimbra, D., Greenwood, R. & Kendall, K. Tensile testing of ceramic fibres by video extensometry. Journal of Materials Science 35, 3341–3345 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004824817000
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004824817000