Skip to main content
Log in

Deformation and fracture of paper during the in-plane fracture toughness testing--Examination of the essential work of fracture method

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The “essential work of fracture” (EWF) method is applied to various machine-made papers. The deforming and fracturing processes of the paper samples during testing is analyzed by means of the thermographic observation. Plastic deformation zone appears in three ways when deep double edge notched tension specimens are strained under in-plane stress: i.e. 1. type (i)--appearing through whole the ligament in a vague manner and developing into a circular (or oval) zone even before or at the maximum load point; 2. type (ii)--appearing from notch tip and amalgamating into a circular (or oval) zone after the maximum load point; and 3. type (iii)--appearing from notch tip and not amalgamating into a circular (or oval) zone until the sheet failure. Specimens with small ligament length (L) are likely to belong to type (i), while those with large L to type (ii) & (iii). Among these three types, type (i) fulfills the original assumption of the EWF method best in terms of the complete ligament yielding before crack initiation. Thus the specific essential work of fracture determined using the linear relation of type (i) should be correct, although the estimated work is a little smaller than that from the linear relation of type (ii) & (iii).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Niskanen, in "Products of Papermaking," edited by C. F. Baker (PIRA International, Leatherhead, Surry, UK., 1993) p. 641. Transactions of the 10th Fundamental Research Symposium, Oxford, September 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Yuhara and M. T. Kortschot, ibid., p. 783.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. S. Seth, ibid., p. 1529.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Fellers, "Lorentzen & Wettre Handbook-95" (Lorentzen & Wettre, Sweden, 1995) p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Tanaka, Y. Otsuka and T. Yamauchi, Tappi J. 80 (1997) 222.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. S. Seth, A. G. Robertson, Y. W. Mai and J. D. Hoffman, ibid. 76 (1993) 109.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. S. Seth, ibid. 78 (1995) 177.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Cotterell and J. K. Reddel, Int. J. Fract. 13 (1977) 267.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Cotterell, in "Fracture Mechanics and Technology, Vol. 2," edited by G. C. Sih and C. L. Chow (Sijthoff and Nordhoff, Alphenaan den Rijn, 1977) p. 785.

  10. Y. Yu and P. KÄrenlampi, J. Mater. Sci. 32 (1997) 6513.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tanaka, A., Yamauchi, T. Deformation and fracture of paper during the in-plane fracture toughness testing--Examination of the essential work of fracture method. Journal of Materials Science 35, 1827–1833 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004797023064

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004797023064

Keywords

Navigation