Abstract
Of the instruments devised for measuring self-reported activation, those that consider arousal dimensions (energy and tension) and a third dimension (hedonic tone, or pleasure/displeasure) allow a complete evaluation of the subjective mood. The inventory prepared by Matthews (1987a), which also incorporates a composite general arousal scale made up of items from the principal arousal scales, is one of the most frequently used. The present study assesses the consistency of the four scales of the inventory by means of a confirmatory factor analysis model and version VIII of the Lisrel computer package, and also its stability at different times of day (09:00, 13:00, 17:00 and 21:00). The study sample was made up of 671 healthy university students (236 men/435 women) aged between 17 and 38. Our results confirm the accuracity of fit/goodness of fit of the inventory's three principal factors. However, in our view, the secondary arousal factor should be defined or omitted, since its configura tion was poor at all times of day that the inventory was tested.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Adan, A. (1992). The influence of age, work schedule and personality on morningness dimension, International Journal of Psychophysiology 12: 95–99.
Adan, A. (1993). Circadian variations in psychological measures. A new classification, Chronobiologia 20: 145–161.
Adan, A. (1994). Variaciones diurnas de alerta y fatiga auto-evaluadas, y velocidad motora. Estudio de los factores matutinidad y sexo, Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia 26: 235–251.
Adan, A. & Guàrdia, J. (1993). Circadian variations of self-reported activation. A multidimensional approach, Chronobiologia 20, 233–244.
Bentler, P.M. (1990). Causal modeling via structural equation systems. In: J.R. Nesselroade & R.B. Cattell (eds.), Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 317–333.
Berry, W.D. (1984). Nonrecursive Causal Models, Beverly Hills: Sage.
Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural Equation Models, New York: Wiley.
Caminada, H. & Bruijn, F. (1992). Diurnal variation, morningness-eveningness, and momentary affect, European Journal of Personality 6: 43–69.
Cox, T. & Mackay, C.J. (1985). The measurement of self-reported stress and arousal, British Journal of Psychoiogy 76: 183–186.
Goffin, R.D. (1993). A comparison of two new indices for the assessment of fit of structural equation models, Multivariate Behavioral Research 28: 205–214.
Guàrdia, J. (1986). Los sistemas de ecuaciones estructurales en el ámbito de la psicología, Unpublished PhD. Barcelona: University of Barcelona.
Guàrdia, J. & Arnau, J. (1991). Análisis evaluativo de las características teórico empírieas de los sistemas de ecuaciones estructurales, Anuario de Psicología 48: 5–16.
Hernández, J.A. (1993). Modelos longitudinales en panel desde la perspectiva de las ecuaciones estructurales, unpublished PhD. La Laguna (Tenerife): University of La Laguna.
Joreskog, K.G. & Sorbom, D. (1991). Lisrel VII. Chicago.
Kerkhof, G.A. (1982). Event-related potentials and auditory signal detection: their diurnal variation for morning-type and evening-type subjects, Psychophysiology 19: 94–103.
Loehlin, J.C. (1987). Latent Variable Models. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Pub.
Matthews, G. (1987a). UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist, Birmingham: Applied Psychology Department.
Matthews, G. (1987b). Personality and multidimensional arousal: a study of two dimensions of extraversion, Personality and Individual Differences 8: 9–16.
Matthews, G. (1988). Morningness-eveningness as a dimension of personality: trait, state, and psychophysiological correlates, European Journal of Personality 2: 277–293.
Matthews, G. (1992). Mood. In: A.P. Smith & D.M. Jones (eds.), Handbook of Human Performance, London: Academic Press, vol. 3, pp. 161–193.
Matthews, G. & Harley, T.A. (1993). Effects of extraversion and self-reported arousal on semantic priming: a connectionist approach, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65: 735–756.
Matthews, G., Jones, D.M. & Chamberlain, A.G. (1989). Interactive effects of extraversion and arousal on attentional task performance: multiple resources or encoding processes? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: 629–639.
Matthews, G., Jones, D.M. & Chamberlain, A.G. (1990). Refining the measurement of mood: the UWIST mood adjective checklist, British Journal of Psychology 81: 17–42.
Monk, T.H. (1989). Circadian rhythms in subjective activation, mood, and performance efficiency. In: M.H. Kryger, T. Roth & W.C. Dement (eds.), Principles and Practice of Sleep Medicine, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, pp. 163–172.
Monk, T.H., Fookson, J.E., Kream, J., Moline, M.L., Pollak, C.P. & Weitzman, M.B. (1985). Cireadian factors during sustained performance: background and methodology, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 17: 19–26.
Scott Long, J. (1983). Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Beverly Hills: Sage.
Thayer, R.E. (1967). Measurement of activation through self-report, Psychological Reports 20: 663–678.
Thayer, R.E. (1978). Toward a psychological theory of multidimensional activation (arousal), Motivation and Emotion 2: 1–34.
Warr, P. (1990). The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health, Journal of Occupational Psychology 63: 193–210.
Williams, D.G. (1989). Personality effects in current mood: pervasive or reactive? Personality and Individual Differences 10: 941–948.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gua`rdia, J., Adan, A. Confirmatory factor analysis applied to Matthews adjective checklist of self-reported activation: effect of time of day. Quality & Quantity 31, 95–106 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004242119822
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004242119822