Abstract
Based on a synthesis of the literature and observations of young children over two years, a framework for assessing probabilistic thinking was formulated, refined and validated. The major constructs incorporated in this framework were sample space, probability of an event, probability comparisons, and conditional probability. For each of these constructs, four levels of thinking, which reflected a continuum from subjective to numerical reasoning, were established. At each level, and across all four constructs, learning descriptors were developed and used to generate probability tasks. The framework was validated through data obtained from eight grade three children who served as case studies. The thinking of these children was assessed at three points over a school year and analyzed using the problem tasks in interview settings. The results suggest that although the framework produced a coherent picture of children‘s thinking in probability, there was ‘static’ in the system which generated inconsistencies within levels of thinking. These inconsistencies were more pronounced following instruction. The levels of thinking in the framework appear to be in agreement with levels of cognitive functioning postulated by Neo-Piagetian theorists and provide a theoretical foundation for designers of curriculum and assessment programs in elementary school probability. Further studies are needed to investigate whether the framework is appropriate for children from other cultural and linguistic backgrounds.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Acredolo, C., O'Connor, J., Banks, L., and Horobin, K.: 1989, ‘Children's ability to make probability estimates: Skills revealed through application of Anderson's functional measurement methodology’, Child Development 60, 933–945.
Biggs, J. B. and Collis, K. F.: 1991, ‘Multimodal learning and the quality of intelligent behavior’, in H. A. H. Rowe (ed.), Intelligence: Reconceptualization and Measurement, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 57–76.
Borovcnik, M. G. and Bentz, H. J.: 1991, ‘Empirical research in understanding probability’: in R. Kapadia and M. Borovcnik (eds.), Chance Encounters: Probability in Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 73–105.
Case, R.: 1985, Cognitive Development, Academic Press, New York.
Cohen, J. and Hansel, M.: 1956, Risk and Gambling, Philosophical Library, Inc., New York.
Department of Education and Science and the Welsh Office.: 1991, National Curriculum: Mathematics for Ages 5 to 16. Central Office of Information, York, UK.
English, L. D.: 1993, ‘Children's strategies for solving two-and three-stage combinatorial problems’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 24(3), 255–273.
Falk, R.: 1983, ‘Children's choice behaviour in probabilistic situations’, in: D. R. Grey, P. Holmes, V. Barnett, and G. M. Constable (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Volume II, University of Sheffield, England, pp. 714–716
Falk, R.: 1988, ‘Conditional probabilities: Insights and difficulties’, in: R. Davidson and J. Swift (eds.), Proceedings: The Second International Conference on Teaching Statistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C., pp. 292–297.
Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P. and Peterson, P. L.: 1989, ‘Learning Mathematics with Understanding,’ in: J. Brophy (ed.), Advances in Research on Teaching, Volume I, JAI, Greenwich, CT, pp. 195–221.
Fischbein, E., Nello, M. S., Marino, M. S.: 1991, ‘Factors affecting probabilistic judgments in children in adolescence’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 22(6), 523–549.
Green, D. R.: 1982, ‘A survey of probability concepts in 3000 pupils aged 11–16 years’, in: D. R. Grey, P. Holmes, V. Barnett and G. M. Constable (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Volume II, University of Sheffield, U.K., pp. 766–783.
Hawkins, A. and Kapadia, R.: 1984, ‘Children's conceptions of probability: A psychological and pedagogical review’, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 349–377.
Jones, G. A.: 1974, ‘The performance of first, second, and third grade children on five concepts of probability and the effects of grade, IQ, and embodiments on their performances’, Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
Jones, G. A., Thornton, C. A., Langrall, C. W. and Mogill, A. T.: submitted, ‘Using children's probabilistic thinking in instruction,’ The Journal of Mathematical Behavior.
Jones, G. A. and Thornton, C. A.: 1992, Data, Chance & Probability: Grades 1-3 Activity Book. Learning Resources, Lincolnshire, IL., pp. 1–80.
Jones, G. A., Thornton, C. A., Putt, I. J., Hill, K. M., Mogill, A. T., Rich, B. S. and Van Zoest, L. R.: 1996, ‘Mulitdigit number sense: A framework for instruction and assessment,’ Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 117–143.
Konold, C.: 1989, ‘An outbreak of belief in independence’, in C. Maher, G. Goldin and B. Davis (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Volume 2, Rutgers University Press, Rutgers, NJ, pp. 203–209.
Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M.: 1984, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.: 1989, Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, The Council, Reston, VA.
Perner, J.: 1979, ‘Discrepant results in experimental studies of young children's understanding of probability’, Child Development 50, 1121–1127.
Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B.: 1975, The Origin of the Idea of Chance in Children (translated by L. Leake, Jr., P. Burrell and H. D. Fischbein), W. W. Norton, New York.
Schroeder, T. L.: 1988, ‘Elementary school children's use of strategy in playing microcomputer probability games’, in R. Davidson and J. Swift (eds.), Proceedings: The Second International Conference on Teaching Statistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C., pp. 51–56.
Shaughnessy, J. M.: 1992, ‘Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions’, in D. A. Grouws (ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, pp. 465–494.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, G.A., Langrall, C.W., Thornton, C.A. et al. A framework for assessing and nurturing young children‘s thinking in probability. Educational Studies in Mathematics 32, 101–125 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002981520728
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002981520728