Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T23:33:52.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: The 2010 Report by the UN Special Representative on Business and Human Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The relationship between human rights law and business has emerged in recent years as one of the most topical to be discussed and put on the agenda almost worldwide. The activities of corporations in this globalized environment have often served as the catalyst for human rights violations; due to the lack of institutional protection, some corporations are able to exploit regulatory lacunae and the lack of human rights protection. On 9 April 2010 Professor John Ruggie, the United Nations Special Representative of the Secretary General on human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, submitted his fifth Report under the title “Business and Human Rights: Further steps toward the operationalization of the ‘protect, respect and remedy’ framework.” The objective of this short article is to examine his 2010 report and to establish whether this Report has contributed to clarifying standards in the field of human rights and business.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 See Ruggie, John, Business and Human Rights: The Evolving International Agenda, 101 The American Journal of International Law, 819 (2007).Google Scholar

2 John Ruggie, United Nations, General Assembly, Human Rights Council, Fourteenth session, Agenda item 3, Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development; Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie, Business and Human Rights: Further steps toward the operationalization of the “protect, respect and remedy” framework, available at: http://198.170.85.29/Ruggie-report-2010.pdf, (hereinafter the 2010 report) (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

3 Id., 7.Google Scholar

4 ECOSOC, Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, Norms on the Responsibility of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/12/Rev.2 (26 August 2003). ECOSOC, Commission on Human Rights, Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Related Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/DEC/2004/116 (20 April, 2004). The Commission, in Resolution 2004/116 of 20 April 2004, expressed the view that, while the Norms contained ‘useful elements and ideas’ for its consideration, as a draft the proposal had no legal standing.Google Scholar

5 Surya Deva, UN's Human Rights Norms for Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises: An Imperfect Step in the Right Direction, 10 ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law, 494, 498 (2004).Google Scholar

6 David Weissbrodt, Maria Kruger, Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights, 97 American Journal of International LAW, 901, 913–915, 921(2003).Google Scholar

7 See Interim Report of the Special Representative, U.N. Document E/CN.4/2006/97; HRC, Business and Human Rights: Mapping International Standards of Responsibility and Accountability for Corporate Acts, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/4/35 (19 February 2007); HRC, State Responsibilities to Regulate and Adjudicate Corporate Activities Under the United Nations Core Human Rights Treaties: An Overview of Treaty Body Commentaries, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/4/35/Add.1 (13 February 2007) (prepared by John Ruggie); HRC, Corporate Responsibility under International Law and Issues in Extraterritorial Regulation: Summary of Legal Workshops, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/4/35/Add.2 (15 February 2007) (prepared by John Ruggie); HRC, Human Rights Policies and Management Practices: Results from Questionnaire Surveys of Governments and Fortune Global 500 Firms, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/4/35/Add.3 (28 February 2007) (prepared by John Ruggie); HRC, Business Recognition of Human Rights: Global Patterns, Regional and Sectoral Variations, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/4/35/Add.4 (8 February 2007) (prepared by John Ruggie); HRC, Human Rights Impact Assessments – Resolving Key Methodological Questions, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/4/74 (5 February 2007) (prepared by John Ruggie).Google Scholar

8 John Ruggie's 2006 report, 8.Google Scholar

9 John Ruggie's 2008 report, 81.Google Scholar

10 John Ruggie, “Business and Human Rights: Mapping International Standards of Responsibility and Accountability for Corporate Acts”, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General (SRSG) on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, A/HRC/4/035, 9 February 2007.Google Scholar

11 John Ruggie's 2008 report, para. 9.Google Scholar

12 Olufemi Amao, Review of the report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and Transnational corporations and other business enterprises; Professor John Ruggie to the United Nations Human Rights Council, ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy: a Framework for Business and Human Rights’ HRC/8/5, 7 April 2008, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstractid=1131682 (last accessed: 17 November 2010), 5.Google Scholar

13 John Ruggie's 2009 report, para. 46. See J. Letnar Černič, A Short Comment on the Report of the 2009 UN Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, Libertas Working Paper 02/2009, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstractid=1491548 (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

14 Id., para. 48.Google Scholar

15 See John Ruggie's 2010 Report, supra note 2, para. 2.Google Scholar

17 John Ruggie's 2008 report, para. 17. See also John Knox, Concept Paper on Facilitating Specification of the Duty to Protect, Olufemi Amao; Review of the report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and Transnational corporations and other business enterprises, Professor John Ruggie to the United Nations Human Rights Council, “Protect, Respect and Remedy: a Framework for Business and Human Rights” HRC/8/5, 7 April 2008, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstractid=1131682 (last accessed: 17 November 2010). Prepared for Special Representative John G. Ruggie, 14 December 2007, available at: http://www.business-humanrights.org/Documents/Knox-Specification-of-Duty-to-Protect-14-Dec-2007.pdf (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

18 John Ruggie's 2006 Report, para. 82.Google Scholar

19 For a detailed discussion on tripartite human rights typology see, Asbj⊘rn Eide, Right to Adequate Food as a Human Right, Human Rights Study Series No 1, United Nations publication (34–37, Sales No. E.89.XIV.2) (1989); Eide, The right to adequate food and to be free from hunger – Updated study on the right to food, submitted by Mr. Asbj⊘rn Eide in accordance with Sub-Commission decision 1998/106, UN Doc E/CN.4/Sub.2/12 (1999); Magdalena Sepulveda, The Nature of the Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Intersentia, 2003). See also Ida Elisabeth Koch, Dichotomies, Trichotomies or Waves of Duties?, 5 Human Rights Law Review, 81–103 (2005). Brigit C. A Toebes, The Right to Health as a Human Right in International Law (1999) 312–316. G.J.H. van Hoof, Legal Nature of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Rebuttal of Some Traditional Views, in The right to food, 106–108 (P. Alston and K. Tomaševski eds., 1984). Nicola Jägers, Corporate human Rights obligations, Intersentia (2002), chapter 4 [Human Rights Obligations of Corporations].Google Scholar

20 John Ruggie's 2010 Report, supra note 2, para. 2.Google Scholar

21 Id., para. 18.Google Scholar

22 Id., para. 19.Google Scholar

23 Nicola Jägers, Corporate Human Rights Obligations. In Search of Accountability (2002), Andrew Clapham, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (2006), Chapter 6 [Corporations and Human Rights].Google Scholar

25 Id., para. 55.Google Scholar

26 Id., para. 59.Google Scholar

28 Id., para. 58.Google Scholar

29 Nicola Jägers, Corporate Human Rights Obligations. In Search of Accountability (2002), A. Clapham, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (2006), see supra note 23.Google Scholar

30 Id., para.63.Google Scholar

32 Id., para. 64.Google Scholar

33 Id., para.65.Google Scholar

34 Id., para.66.Google Scholar

35 Id., para.76.Google Scholar

36 Id., para.78.Google Scholar

37 Id., para. 84.Google Scholar

38 Id., para. 91.Google Scholar

39 Id., para. 92.Google Scholar

40 Id., para. 97.Google Scholar

41 Id., para. 101.Google Scholar

43 Id., para. 115.Google Scholar

44 Id., para. 117.Google Scholar

45 Id., para. 22.Google Scholar

46 Id., para. 124.Google Scholar

47 Id., para. 126.Google Scholar

48 Scott Jerbi, Business and Human Rights at the UN: What Might Happen Next?, 31 Human rights quarterly: a comparative and international journal of the social sciences, philosophy, and law, 299–320 (2009), and Larissa Van Den Herik, Jernej Letnar Černič, Regulating Corporations under International Law: From Human Rights to International Criminal Law and Back Again, 10 Journal of International Criminal Justice, 725–743. See also James Harrison, 2010 Ruggie Report on Business and Human Rights, available at: http://internationallawobserver.eu/2010/04/29/2010-ruggie-report-on-business-and-human-rights (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

49 Statement by Amnesty International, 1 June 2010, available at: http://www.business-humanrights.org/SpecialRepPortal/Home/ReportstoUNHumanRightsCouncil/2010 (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

50 See, for example, Larry Cata Becker, A Consideration of John Ruggie's 2010 Report to 14th session of UN Human Rights Council: “Business and Human Rights: Further steps toward the operationalization of the ‘protect, respect and remedy’ framework”, available at: http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/2010/05/consideration-of-john-ruggies-2010.html (last accessed: 17 November 2010). See also statement by Stéphane Brabant, Herbert Smith law firm -28 Apr 2010, available at: http://www.business-humanrights.org/SpecialRepPortal/Home/ReportstoUNHumanRightsCouncil/2010/Comments#43773 (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

51 Statement by Clifford Chance, June 2010, available at: http://www.business-humanrights.org/SpecialRepPortal/Home/ReportstoUNHumanRightsCouncil/2010/Comments (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

52 Statement by Amnesty International, 1 June 2010, available at: http://www.business-humanrights.org/SpecialRepPortal/Home/ReportstoUNHumanRightsCouncil/2010 (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

53 Statement by Human Rights Advocates, 3 June 2010, available at: http://www.business-humanrights.org/SpecialRepPortal/Home/ReportstoUNHumanRightsCouncil/2010 (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

55 Statement by International Commission of Jurists, ICJ Intervention in the interactive dialogue with the Special Representative of the Secretary General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, 1 June 2010, p. 1, http://www.ici.org/dwn/database/ICJStatement-HRC-01062010-BHR.pdf (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

56 Id., 1–2.Google Scholar

57 Joint Statement by ESCR-net, 4 June 2010, Statement by Human Rights Advocates, 3 June 2010, available at: http://www.business-humanrights.org/SpecialRepPortal/Home/ReportstoUNHumanRightsCouncil/2010 (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

58 Joint Statement by International Federation of Human Rights and Human Rights in China on the occasion of the Interactive Dialogue with the Special Representative on the issue of business and human rights during the Human Rights Council 14th session, June 2010, available at: http://www.business-humanrights.org/SpecialRepPortal/Home/ReportstoUNHumanRightsCouncil/2010 (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

59 Statement by the International Coordinating Committee of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, 1 June 2010, available at: http://www.business-humanrights.org/SpecialRepPortal/Home/ReportstoUNHumanRightsCouncil/2010 (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

60 British Petroleum, Human Rights: A guidance note, 2005, available at: http://www.bp,com/liveassets/bpinternet/globalbp/STAGING/globalassets/downloads/BPHumanRights2005.pdf (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

61 Ibid. See Final Statement by the UK National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Afrimex (UK) Ltd., 28 August 2008, available at: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file47555.doc, 76 (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

62 Corporate Complicity and Legal Accountability, Volume 1: Facing the Facts and Charting a Legal Path, Accountability Report of the International Commission of Jurists Expert Legal Panel on Corporate Complicity in International Crimes, Geneva, September 2008, available at: http://icj.org/IMG/Volume1.pdf, 29–30 (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

63 Andrew Clapham, Human Rights Obligations of Non-state actors (2006), 231.Google Scholar

65 NIcola Jägers, Corporate human rights obligations (2002).Google Scholar

66 Shell Corporation, Shell, Business and Human Rights, A Management Primer, 23.Google Scholar

67 British Petroleum, Human rights: A guidance note, 2005, available at: http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bpinternet/globalbp/STAGING/globalassets/downloads/BPHumanRights2005.pdf, 12 (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

68 Chevron Corporation, Human Rights Policy, available at: http://www.chevron.com/globalissues/humanrights (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

69 Citigroup, Corporate Citizenship, available at: http://www.citigroup.com/citi/citizen (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

70 Coca-Cola Human Rights Statement, available at: http://www.thecocacolacompany.com/citizenship/humanrightsstatement.html (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

71 Exxon Mobil, Statement of Principles on Security and Human Rights, available at: http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/lmports/ccr2009/communityrights.aspx (last accessed: 17 November 2010)‥Google Scholar

72 Total Corporation, Position and Commitments on Human Rights, available at: http://www.total.com/en/about-total/group-presentation/business-principles/human-rights-940522.html (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

73 General Motors – Corporate Responsibility, available at: http://www.gm.com/corporate/responsibility (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

74 Wal-Mart Corporate, Requirements for Suppliers, available at: http://walmartstores.com/Suppliers/248.aspx (last accessed: 17 November 2010); see Equal Opportunity Practices.Google Scholar

75 Conoco-Philips Corporation, Human Rights Position, available at: http://www.conocophillips.com/EN/susdev/policies/humanrightsposition/Pages/index.aspx (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

76 Daimler-Chrysler, The Social Commitment, available at: http://www.daimler.com/company/sustainability/customers-and-society/social-responsibility (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

77 De Beers Corporation, Community Policy, available at: http://www.debeersgroup.com/en/Sustainability/Communities (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar

78 David Weissbrodt and Maria Kruger, Human Rights Responsibilities of Businesses as Non-State Actors, in Non-state actors and Human Rights 345 (P. Alston ed, 2005).Google Scholar

79 For some proposals and discussion in this respect see, M. Scheinin, Towards a World Court of Human Rights, Research report within the framework of the Swiss Initiative to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 30 April 2009, available at: http://www.eui.eu/Documents/DepartmentsCentres/Law/Professors/Scheinin/WorldCourtReport30April2009.pdf; S. Trechsel, A World Court for Human Rights?, 1 Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights, (2004), and M. Nowak, The Need for a World Court of Human Rights, 1 Human Rights Law Review, 251–259 (2007).Google Scholar

80 Jens Martens and Elisabeth Strohscheidt, Problematic Pragmatism, The Ruggie Report 2008: Background, Analysis and Perspectives June 2008, Global Policy Forum and Misereor.Google Scholar

81 Id. Andrej Logar, speaking on behalf of the European Union, regarding Action on Resolution on Mandate of Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Human Rights and Transnational Corporations, available at: http://www.unhchr.ch/huricane/huricane.nsf/view01/F862D09328BA5EACC125746C006CB1DF?opendocument (last accessed: 17 November 2010).Google Scholar