Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T16:29:57.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distributed Participatory Design: The challenges of designing with physically disabled musicians during a global pandemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2021

Franziska Schroeder*
Affiliation:
Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland
Alex Lucas*
Affiliation:
Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland

Abstract

The global COVID-19 pandemic has been an extraordinary situation. Social distancing has impacted the vast majority of people, reorganising society, physically separating us from friends, family and colleagues. Collectively we found ourselves in a distributed state, reliant upon digital technologies to maintain social and professional connections. Some activities can translate unabated to a digital medium, with benefits, such as the convenience inherent in many online shopping and banking services. Other activities, particularly those which are socially engaged, including inclusive music-making or design, may need to be re-framed and re-thought due to the absence of in-person contact.

In Northern Ireland, the Performance Without Barriers (PwB) research group works with disabled artists from the Drake Music Project Northern Ireland (DMNI) to identify ways in which technology can remove access barriers to music-making. Since disabled people are experts in their unique lived experience of disability, they must be involved in the design process, an approach known as participatory design. At the end of 2020, many of us are still adjusting to the new normal, only beginning to understand the impact of distributed digital living. In this article, we examine how the socially engaged work of PwB has been affected, changed and adapted during the pandemic throughout 2019 to 2020, expanding ideas of distributed creativity to the notion of distributed design. The authors formalise the concept of socially engaged distributed participatory design, an approach that classifies PwB’s current research activities in the area of accessible music technology design and improvised musicking. Consideration is given to the impact the notion of ‘distribution’ has on degrees of participation.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alarcón, X. 2020. Telematic Sonic Performance Part 1: A Short Introduction. The Sampler. https://thesampler.org/guest-editor/telematic-sonic-performance-part-1/ (accessed 13 June 2020).Google Scholar
Charlton, J. 1998. Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, H. 2020. Orchestra Plays Beethoven Online from Their Bedrooms. The Telegraph. www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2020/03/23/rotterdam-philharmonic-musicians-collaborate-stream-beethovens (accessed 3 May 2020).Google Scholar
Clarke, E. F. and Doffman, M. 2017. Distributed Creativity: Collaboration and Improvisation in Contemporary Music. Oxford Scholarship Online. https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/oso/9780199355914.001.0001/oso-9780199355914 (accessed 7 August 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, E. 2017. Compare 6 Different Pair Programming Styles. Stackify. https://stackify.com/pair-programming-styles/ (accessed 30 August 2020).Google Scholar
Disability Rights UK. 2020. Covid 19 and the Rights of Disabled People. 7 April. www.disabilityrightsuk.org/news/2020/april/covid-19-and-rights-disabled-people (accessed 4 May 2020).Google Scholar
Distributed Design. 2020. European Network, Supported by the European Union through the Creative Europe Fund: https://distributeddesign.eu. (accessed 24 June 2020).Google Scholar
Frid, E. 2019. Accessible Digital Musical Instruments – A Review of Musical Interfaces in Inclusive Music Practice. Multimodal Technology and Interaction 3(3): 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadsden, R. 2020. Introducing Deluge – A Journey through Isolation. Disability Arts Online. https://disabilityarts.online/blog/deluge/introducing-deluge-a-journey-through-isolation/ (accessed 30 August 2020).Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. 2014. Distributed Creativity: Thinking Outside the Box of the Creative Individual. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harder, M., Burford, G. and Hoover, E. 2013. What Is Participation? Design Leads the Way to a Cross-Disciplinary Framework. Design Issues 29(4): 4157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Disability Alliance (IDA). 2020. International Disability Alliance Key Recommendations toward a Disability-Inclusive COVID19 Response. www.internationaldisabilityalliance.org/content/covid-19-and-disability-movement (accessed 5 May 2020).Google Scholar
Lucas, A., Morgan, D., McCord, M. and Leathem, T. 2020. Split Point: Reimagining the Piano as an Inclusive Hyper-Instrument. Music Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, BCU.Google Scholar
Minhas, S. 2019. Agile Design Process. UX Collective. https://uxdesign.cc/agile-design-process-24be92018ad2 (accessed 30 July 2020).Google Scholar
Nancy, J.-L. 2002. Listening. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
New Economics Forum. 2020. Five Ways to Wellbeing. https://neweconomics.org/uploads/files/five-ways-to-wellbeing-1.pdf (accessed 10 September 2020).Google Scholar
Newport, C. 2020. Digital Minimalism: Choosing a Focused Life in a Noisy World. NewYork: Penguin.Google Scholar
Noë, A. 2015. Strange Tools: Art and Human Nature. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
Norman, D. A. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, F. 2020. It Is Not Only Coronavirus That Risks Infecting Society – Our Prejudices Do, Too. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/09/nice-guidelines-coronavirus-pandemic-disabled (accessed 30 August 2020).Google Scholar
Savage, M. 2020. Pop Stars Live-Stream Concerts from Home to Combat Isolation. BBC News. www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-51924765 (accessed 30 April 2020).Google Scholar
Schroeder, F. 2013. Network[ed] Listening – Towards a De-Centering of Beings. Contemporary Music Review 32(2–3): 215–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, F. and Rebelo, P. 2016. Distributed Sounding Art – Practices in Distributing Sound. In Cobussen, M., Meelberg, V. and Truax, B. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Sounding Art. Abingdon: Routledge, 439–50.Google Scholar
Small, C. 1998. Musicking: The Meanings of Performing and Listening. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Stollery, P. 2020. COVID-19 Sound Map. https://tinyurl.com/covid19soundmap (accessed 22 May 2020).Google Scholar
Tsioulakis, I. and FitzGibbon, A. 2020. Performing Artists in the Age of COVID-19: A moment of urgent action and potential change. QPOL. http://qpol.qub.ac.uk/performing-artists-in-the-age-of-covid-19/ (accessed 30 April 2020).Google Scholar
UK Disability Arts Alliance. 2021. We Shall Not Be Removed. www.weshallnotberemoved.com (accessed 16 August 2021).Google Scholar
United Nations. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/ (accessed 22 August 2020).Google Scholar
Usability.gov. 2020. Usability Evaluation Basics. www.usability.gov/what-and-why/usability-evaluation.html (accessed 22 August 2020).Google Scholar
Wessel, D. and Wright, M. 2002. Problems and prospects for intimate musical control of computers. Computer Music Journal 26(3), 1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. 2020a. Becoming Latency Native: Performing Together Over the Internet. Latency Native. https://latencynative.com (accessed 30 June 2020).Google Scholar
Wilson, R. 2020b. Resources for Networked Music Performances. Latency Native. https://latencynative.com/zotero (accessed 9 September 2020).Google Scholar