Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-31T16:28:57.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Whole Farm Analysis of the Influence of Auto-Steer Navigation on Net Returns, Risk, and Production Practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Jordan M. Shockley
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
Carl R. Dillon
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
Timothy S. Stombaugh
Affiliation:
Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
Get access

Abstract

A whole farm economic analysis was conducted to provide a detailed assessment into the economic, risk, and production implications due to the adoption of auto-steer navigation. It was determined that auto-steer navigation was profitable for a grain farmer in Kentucky with net returns increasing up to 0.90% ($3.35/acre). Additionally, the technology could be used in reducing production risk. Adoption of the technology also alters production practices for optimal use.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamchuk, V.I., Stombaugh, T.S., and Price, R.R.GNSS-Based Auto-Guidance in Agriculture.” Technical Bulletin No. 46. South Dakota State University: International Plant Nutrition Institute, 2008.Google Scholar
Cerrato, M.E. and Blackmer, A.M.Comparison of Models for Describing Corn Yield Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer.Agronomy Journal 82(1990):138–43.10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200010030xGoogle Scholar
Dillon, C.R.Production Practice Alternatives for Income and Suitable Field Day Risk Management.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 31,2(1999):247–61.Google Scholar
Dillon, C.R., Stombaugh, T.S., Kayrouz, B.M., Salim, J., and Koostra, B.K. An Educational Workshop on the Use of Precision Agriculture as a Risk Management Tool. Precision Agriculture Refereed Conference Proceedings, 2005, pp. 861–67.Google Scholar
Ehsani, M.R., Sullivan, M., and Walker, J.T.A Method of Evaluating Different Guidance Systems.” Paper presented at the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Chicago, Illinois, July 26-27, 2002.Google Scholar
Freund, R.J.The Introduction of Risk into a Programming Model.Econometrica 24(1956):253–64.10.2307/1911630Google Scholar
Gan-Mor, S., Clark, R.L., and Upchurch, B.L.Implement Lateral Position Accuracy under RTK-GPS Tractor Guidance.Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 59(2007):3138.10.1016/j.compag.2007.04.008Google Scholar
Griffin, T.W., Lambert, D.M., and Lowenberg-DeBoer, J.Economics of Lightbar and Auto-Guidance GPS Navigation Technologies.” Precision Agriculture Refereed Conference Proceedings, 2005, pp. 581–87.Google Scholar
Griffin, T.W., “Economics of GPS-Enabled Navigation Technologies.” Paper presented at the Ninth International Conference on Precision Agriculture, Denver, Colorado, July 20-23, 2008.Google Scholar
Jones, J.W., Hoogenboom, G., Porter, C.H., Boote, K.J., Batchlelor, W.D., Hunt, L.A., Wilkens, P.W., Singh, U., Gijsman, A.J., and Ritchie, J.T.The DSSAT Cropping System Model.European Journal of Agronomy 18(2003):235–65.10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00107-7Google Scholar
Keicher, R., and Seufert, H.Automatic Guidance for Agricultural Vehicles in Europe.Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 25(2000):169–94.10.1016/S0168-1699(99)00062-9Google Scholar
Laughlin, D.H., and Spurlock, S.R. Mississippi State Budget Generator v6.0, 2007.Google Scholar
Lowenberg-DeBoer, J.Risk Management Potential of Precision Farming Technologies.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 31,2(1999):275–85.Google Scholar
McCarl, B.A., and Bessler, D.Estimating an Upper Bound of the Pratt Risk Aversion Coefficient When the Utility Function is Unknown.Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 33(1989):5663.10.1111/j.1467-8489.1989.tb00481.xGoogle Scholar
National Agricultural Statistics Service Kentucky Field Office. Kentucky Agricultural Statistics 2007-2008 Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2008.Google Scholar
Oriade, C.A., and Popp, M.P.Precision Farming as a Risk Reducing Tool: A Whole-Farm Investigation.” Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Precision Agriculture, Minneapolis, Minnesota, July 16-19, 2000.Google Scholar
Palmer, R.J.Techniques of Navigating in a Farm Field.Navigation: Journal of The Institute of Navigation 36,4(1989):337–44.10.1002/j.2161-4296.1989.tb01523.xGoogle Scholar
Pierce, J.S. Kentucky Farm Business Management Program: Annual Summary Data 2008. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service, 2008.Google Scholar
Reid, J.F., Zhang, Q., Noguchi, N., and Dickson, M.Agricultural Automatic Guidance Research in North America.” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 25(2000):155–67.10.1016/S0168-1699(99)00061-7Google Scholar
Schmidt, J.P., DeJoia, A.J., Ferguson, R.B., Taylor, R.K., Young, R.K., and Havlin, J.L.Corn Yield Response to Nitrogen at Multiple In-Field Locations.Agronomy Journal 94(2002):798806.10.2134/agronj2002.7980Google Scholar
Schnitkey, G., and Lattz, D. Illinois Farm Business Management. Internet site: http://www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/manage/machmery/machinery_summary.html (Accessed December 2008).Google Scholar
Stombaugh, T.S. Personal Communication. University of Kentucky Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, May 2009.Google Scholar
Stombaugh, T.S., Koostra, B.K., Dillon, CR., Mueller, T.G., and Pike, A.C.Implications of Topography on Field Coverage When Using GPS-Based Guidance.” Precision Agriculture Refereed Conference Proceedings, 2007, pp. 425–32.Google Scholar
Stombaugh, T.S., McLaren, D., and Koostra, B.The Global Positioning System.” Technical Bulletin No. AEN-88. University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service, 2005.Google Scholar
Stombaugh, T.S., and Shearer, S.A.DGPS-Based Guidance of High-Speed Application Equipment.” Paper presented at the conference of American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Sacramento, California, July 29-August 1, 2001.Google Scholar
University of Kentucky, College of Agriculture-UKAg Weather Center. Internet site: http://www.agwx.ca.uky.edu (Accessed June, 2008).Google Scholar
University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service Bulletins. AGRI, AGR129, AGR130, AGRI32, ID 139 Bulletins. Internet site: http://dept.ca.uky.edu/agc/pub_area.asp?area=ANR (Accessed June 2008).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture-National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2007 Census of Agriculture. Washington, DC: USDA, 2010.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service. Internet site: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov (Accessed June, 2008).Google Scholar
World Agricultural Outlook Board. “World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates.” Technical Bulletin No. WASDE-463. U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2008.Google Scholar