Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T00:50:41.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What might Brexit mean for trade and animal welfare in the Latin American pork industry?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

E Vargas-Bello-Pérez ,
GG Miguel-Pacheco ,
J Figueroa  and
J Lensink
E Vargas-Bello-Pérez*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 3, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
GG Miguel-Pacheco
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonnington, Leicestershire LE12 5RD, UK
J Figueroa
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciencias Animales, Facultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
J Lensink
Affiliation:
ISA Lille, CASE, Animal Behaviour and Livestock Systems, Lille Cedex, France
*
* Contact for correspondence: evargasb@sund.ku.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letter
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 243 - 246
Copyright
© 2019 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agosin, MR and Bravo-Ortega, C 2009 The emergence of new successful export activities in Latin America: The case of Chile. IDB Working Paper No 236. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn. 1807608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AHDB 2016 What might Brexit mean for UK trade in pork products? Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board: Warwickshire, UKGoogle Scholar
Anonymous 2017 Will Brexit lead to ‘race to the bottom’ for UK food animal welfare standards? Veterinary Record 181: 104–104Google Scholar
Arvizu Tovar, LO and Téllez Reyes Retana, ER 2016 Bienestar Animal en México-Un Panorama Normativo. National Autonomous University of Mexico: Mexico City, Mexico. [Title translation: Animal welfare in Mexico - a regulatory landscape]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASPROCER 2016 30 years: 2015 Report. Pork Producers Trade Association of Chile. https://www.asprocer.cl/en/assets/uploads/2016/09/asprocer-report2015.pdfGoogle Scholar
ASPROCER 2018 Pork industry analysis. http://www.asprocer.cl/en/industry/pork-industry-analysis/Google Scholar
Brown, J 2017 National Sow Housing Conversion Project National Sow Housing Conversion Newsletter. NSHCP. http://group-sowhousing.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/NSHC-Newsletter-vol-1-iss-4-pdfGoogle Scholar
Denver, S, Sandøe, P and Christensen, T 2017 Consumer preferences for pig welfare - Can the market accommodate more than one level of welfare pork? Meat Science 129: 140–146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Union Committee 2017a Brexit: Farm Animal Welfare 5th Report of Session 2017-19. Authority of the House of Lords: London, UKGoogle Scholar
European Union Committee 2017b Brexit: Agriculture 20th Report of Session 2016-17. Authority of the House of Lords: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Figueroa, J, Solà-Oriol, D, Vinokurovas, L, Manteca, X and Pérez, JF 2013 Prenatal flavour exposure through maternal diets influences flavour preference in piglets before and after weaning. Animal Feed Science and Technology 183: 160–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, J 2008 Is there an “animal welfare Kuznets curve”? Ecological Economics 66: 478–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galindo, F, Tadich, T, Ungerfeld, R, Hötzel, M and Miguel-Pacheco, G 2016 The Development of Applied Ethology in Latin America. Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallo, C 2007 Animal welfare in the Americas. Compendium of Technical Items Presented to the International Committee or to the Regional Commissions of the OIE pp 151–166. http://www.oie.int/flleadmin/Home/eng/Publication_%26_Documentation/docs/pdf/TT2006_151-158_Gallo_A.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gallo, CS and Tadich, TG 2018 Perspective from Latin America. In: Mench, JA (ed) Advances in Agricultural Animal Welfare pp 197–218. Woodhead Publishing: Kidlington, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnett, T, Appleby, MC, Balmford, A, Bateman, IJ, Benton, TG, Bloomer, P, Burlingame, B, Dawkins, M, Dolan, L, Fraser, D, Herrero, M, Hoffmann, I, Smith, P, Thornton, PK, Toulmin, C, Vermeulen, SJ and Godfray, HCJ 2013 Sustainable intensification in agriculture: Premises and policies. Science 341: 33–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCulloch, S 2018 Brexit and animal protection: Legal and political context and a framework to assess impacts on animal welfare. Animals 8: 213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlone, JJ 2013 The future of pork production in the world: Towards sustainable, welfare-positive systems. Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDP13: 401–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministerio de Agricultura de Chile 2013a Aprueba reglamento sobre protección del ganado durante el transporte, Santiago, Chile. http://bcn.cl/1v8yh. [Title translation: Approved regulation for the protection of livestock during transport]Google Scholar
Ministerio de Agricultura de Chile 2013b Reglamento sobre protección de los animales durante su producción industrial, su comercialización y en otros recintos de mantención de animales, Santiago, Chile. http://bcn.cl/1vkjb. [Title translation: Regulation for the protection of animals during their industrial production, the commercialisation and while in other animal-keeping areas]Google Scholar
Ministerio de Agricultura de Chile 2013c Reglamento sobre protección de los animales que provean de carne, pieles, plumas y otros productos al momento del beneficio en establecimientos industriales, Santiago, Chile. http://bcn.cl/1w20o. [Title translation: Regulation for the protection of animals that provide meat, skins, feathers and other products at the time of slaughter]Google Scholar
Mitchell, L, Romanowicz, B, Sawyer, P, Reyes, E and Deblitz, C 2017 The pig industry's transition to group sow housing: economic and welfare assessments. Braunschweig, Germany. https:literatur. thuenen.de/digbib-extern/dn058694.pdfGoogle Scholar
Moeser, AJ, Pohl, CS and Rajput, M 2017 Weaning stress and gastrointestinal barrier development: Implications for lifelong gut health in pigs. Animal Nutrition 3: 313–321CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NFACC 2014 Code of Practice for the Care and Handling of Pigs. National Farm Animal Care Council: Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
ODEPA 2014 Mercado porcino: coyuntura internacional y efectos en el mercado interno. Ministerio de Agricultura de Chile: Chile. [Title translation: Pork market - international conjecture and effects in the domestic market]Google Scholar
Paranhos da Costa, MJR, Huertas, SM, Gallo, C and Dalla Costa, OA 2012 Strategies to promote farm animal welfare in Latin America and their effects on carcass and meat quality traits. Meat Science 92: 221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivera, E, Hernandez, R, Carissimi, AS and Pekow, C 2016 Laboratory animal legislation in Latin America. ILAR Journal 57: 293–300Google ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, R, Amos, N and van de Weerd, HA 2017 Corporate reporting on farm animal welfare: An evaluation of global food companies’ discourse and disclosures on farm animal welfare. Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI 7: 17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tadich, N, Gallo, C, Brito, ML and Broom, DM 2009 Effects of weaning and 48 h transport by road and ferry on some blood indicators of welfare in lambs. Livestock Science 121: 132–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Te Velde, H, Aarts, N and Van Woerkum, C 2002 Dealing with ambivalence: Farmers’ and consumers’ perceptions of animal welfare in livestock breeding. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15: 203–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Council of the European Union 2008 Council Directive 2008/120/EC Laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. Official Journal of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/food/animals/welfare/practice/farms/pigs_enGoogle Scholar
Thorslund, CA, Aaslyng, MD and Lassen, J 2017 Perceived importance and responsibility for market-driven pig welfare: Literature review. Meat Science 125: 37–45Google ScholarPubMed
van de Weerd, HA and Day, JEL 2009 A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116: 1–20Google Scholar
Vargas-Bello-Pérez, E, Miranda-de la Lama, GC, Teixeira, DL, Enríquez-Hidalgo, D, Tadich, T and Lensink, J 2017b Farm animal welfare influences on markets and consumer attitudes in Latin America: The cases of Mexico, Chile and Brazil. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 30: 697–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas-Bello-Pérez, E, Riveros, JL, Köbrich, C, Álvarez-Melo, PA and Lensink, J 2017a Chilean consumers’ perception about animal welfare in dairy production systems: short communication. Animal Production Science 57: 147–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, A 2017 Are we really willing to sacrifice our high farm animal welfare? Veterinary Record 181: 126Google Scholar
Werner, M and Gallo, C 2008 Effects of transport, lairage and stunning on the concentrations of some blood constituents in horses destined for slaughter. Livestock Science 115: 94–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildlife and Countryside Link, and UK Centre for Animal Law 2018 Brexit: Getting the Best Deal for Animals:, London, UK. https://www.alaw.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Brexit-Getting-the-Best-Deal-for-Animals-Full-Report.pdfGoogle Scholar
World Bank 2018 Global Economic Prospects, Chile. https://data.worldbank.org/country/chileGoogle Scholar