Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T15:08:25.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Familial Parkinson's Disease” – A Case-Control Study of Families

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Ryan J. Uitti*
Affiliation:
Neurodegenerative Disorders Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Hitoshi Shinotoh
Affiliation:
Neurodegenerative Disorders Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Margo Hayward
Affiliation:
Neurodegenerative Disorders Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Michael Schulzer
Affiliation:
Neurodegenerative Disorders Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Edwin Mak
Affiliation:
Neurodegenerative Disorders Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Donald B. Calne
Affiliation:
Neurodegenerative Disorders Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
*
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL USA 32224
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Parkinson's disease (PD) patients frequently report a family history of PD and this may provide etiological clues to PD. It has also been suggested that a report of a negative family history is reliable. We studied the prevalence of PD in relatives of PD patients to assess the reliability of family history and to evaluate possible explanations of “familial PD”(fPD).

Methods:

81 of 650 (12.5%) PD probands (all PD patients seen at clinic in 4 years) reported a positive family history of PD. Each fPD proband was matched with non-familial PD (nfPD) proband by gender and year of birth. Screening and follow-up questionnaires were mailed to relatives to obtain information concerning pedigree and presence of neurodegenerative disease. Available family members (regardless of disease status) were examined.

Results:

On examination, 8 persons, said to be “normal” by probands, relatives and themselves, had definite or possible PD (5 fPD, 3 nfPD). The prevalence rate of PD among first and second degree living relatives of probands varied significantly between fPD and nfPD groups (6269/100 000 versus 1190/100 000; p < 0.001). The weighted prevalence (taking into account the proportions of fPD and nfPD within the clinic) was 1822/100 000, a value more than 5 times higher than reported prevalence rates of PD in the general population (p < 0.001). The prevalence rate was greater in first degree relatives than second degree.

Conclusions:

“Familial parkinsonism” cannot be explained merely by size of or advanced age within families. Significant numbers of previously unrecognized PD patients may be identified despite a “negative” family history. That is, the patient's report of an absence of familial parkinsonism is frequently inaccurate. The prevalence rate in relatives of PD patients appears to be higher than the general population – regardless of the family history reported by a PD patient. We believe our study suggests that genetic influences or early life environmental exposures are likely to be of etiological importance in PD.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1997

References

REFERENCES

1.Golbe, LI, Di, IG, Bonavita, V, Miller, DC, Duvoisin, RC. A large kindred with autosomal dominant Parkinson’s Disease. Ann Neurol 1990; 27: 276282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Lazzarini, AM, Myers, RH, Zimmerman, TRJr, et al. A clinical genetic study of Parkinson’s disease: evidence for dominant btransmission. Neurology 1994; 44: 499506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Maraganore, DM, Harding, AE, Marsden, CD. A clinical and genetic study of familial Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 1991; 6: 205211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Gasser, T, Wszolek, ZK, Trofatter, J, et al. Genetic linkage studies in autosomal dominant parkinsonism: evaluation of seven candidate genes. Ann Neurol 1994; 36: 387396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Schoenberg, BS, Anderson, DW, Haerer, AF. Prevalence of Parkinson’s disease in the biracial population of Copiah County, Mississippi. Neurology 1985; 35: 841845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Rajput, AH, Offord, KP, Beard, CM, Kurland LT Epidemiology of parkinsonism: incidence, classification, and mortality. Ann Neurol 1984; 16: 278282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Kondo, K, Kurland, LT. Parkinson’s disease. Genetic analysis and evidence of a multifactorial etiology. Mayo Clin Proc 1973; 48: 465474.Google ScholarPubMed
8.The Parkinson Study Group. DATATOP: a multicenter clinical trial in early Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 13641371.Google Scholar
9.Payami, H, Larsen, K, Bernard, S, Nutt, J. Increased risk of Parkinson–s disease in parents and siblings of patients. Ann Neurol 1994; 36: 659661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Calne, S, Schoenberg, B, Martin, W, et al. Familial Parkinson’s disease: possible role of environmental factors. Can J Neurol Sci 1987; 14: 303305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Rajput, AH, Stern, W, Christ, A, Laverty, W. Etiology of Parkinson’s disease: environmental factor(s). Neurology 1984; 34 (Suppl 1): 207. (Abstract)Google Scholar
12.Rajput, AH, Uitti, RJ, Stern, W, Laverty, W. Early onset Parkinson’s disease in Saskatchewan - environmental considerations for etiology. Can J Neurol Sci 1986; 13: 312316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Barbeau, A, Roy, M, Bernier, G, et al . Ecogenetics of Parkinson’s disease: prevalence and environmental aspects in rural areas. Can J Neurol Sci 1987; 14: 3641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Koller, WC, Vetere-Overfield B, Gray C, et al. Environmental risk factors in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 1990; 40: 12181221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Tanner, CM, Chen, B, Wang, W, et al. Environmental risk factors and Parkinson’s disease: a case-control study in China. Neurology 1989; 39: 660664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Hubble, JP, Cao, T, Hassanein, RES, Neuberger, JS, Koller, WC. Risk factors for Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 1993; 43: 16931697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Clifford, WB, Heaton, TB, Voss, PR, Fuguitt, GV. The rural elderly in demographic perspective. In: Coward, RT, Lee, GR, eds. The Elderly in Rural Society: Every Fourth Elder. New York: Springer, 1985: 2555.Google Scholar