Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T02:46:15.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accounting for the strangeness, infrequency, and suddenness of déjà vu

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2023

Nikola Andonovski Open the ORCID record for Nikola Andonovski [Opens in a new window]  and
Kourken Michaelian Open the ORCID record for Kourken Michaelian [Opens in a new window]
Nikola Andonovski
Affiliation:
Centre de philosophie de la mémoire, Institut de philosophie de Grenoble, Université Grenoble Alpes, CS 40700, Grenoble, Cedex 9, France nikola.andonovski@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr kourken.michaelian@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr http://phil-mem.org/members/andonovski.php http://phil-mem.org/members/michaelian.php
Kourken Michaelian
Affiliation:
Centre de philosophie de la mémoire, Institut de philosophie de Grenoble, Université Grenoble Alpes, CS 40700, Grenoble, Cedex 9, France nikola.andonovski@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr kourken.michaelian@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr http://phil-mem.org/members/andonovski.php http://phil-mem.org/members/michaelian.php
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Barzykowski and Moulin argue that déjà vu is a natural product of autobiographical memory retrieval. Their proposal fails to account for three salient properties of déjà vu experiences: Their strangeness, their infrequency, and their characteristically sudden onset. Accounting for these properties is necessary for proper integration of déjà vu into autobiographical memory research.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e358
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brázdil, M., Mareček, R., Urbánek, T., Kašpárek, T., Mikl, M., Rektor, I., & Zeman, A. (2012). Unveiling the mystery of déjà vu: The structural anatomy of déjà vu. Cortex, 48(9), 1240–1243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, A. S. (1991). A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 204–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, A. S. (2003). A review of the déjà vu experience. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 394–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, A. S., Porter, C. L., & Nix, L. A. (1994). A questionnaire evaluation of the déjà vu experience. Midwestern Psychological Association Convention.Google Scholar
Critchley, E. M. R. (1989). The neurology of familiarity. Behavioural Neurology, 2(3), 195–200.Google Scholar
Neppe, V. M. (1983). The psychology of déjà vu: Have I been here before? Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
O'Connor, A. R., Lever, C., & Moulin, C. J. (2010). Novel insights into false recollection: A model of déjà vécu. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 15(1–3), 118–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodworth, R. S. (1940). Psychology. Henry Holt.Google Scholar