Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T01:27:04.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Educational Implications of Conviction Narrative Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2023

Mark Sheskin Open the ORCID record for Mark Sheskin [Opens in a new window] ,
Michael Bogucki ,
Tomer Perry  and
Katie McAllister
Mark Sheskin
Affiliation:
Minerva University, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA. msheskin@minerva.edu mbogucki@minerva.edu tperry@minerva.edu kmcallister@minerva.edu https://www.marksheskin.com/
Michael Bogucki
Affiliation:
Minerva University, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA. msheskin@minerva.edu mbogucki@minerva.edu tperry@minerva.edu kmcallister@minerva.edu https://www.marksheskin.com/
Tomer Perry
Affiliation:
Minerva University, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA. msheskin@minerva.edu mbogucki@minerva.edu tperry@minerva.edu kmcallister@minerva.edu https://www.marksheskin.com/
Katie McAllister
Affiliation:
Minerva University, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA. msheskin@minerva.edu mbogucki@minerva.edu tperry@minerva.edu kmcallister@minerva.edu https://www.marksheskin.com/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Education often relies on an implicit assumption that decisions are made rationally, and focuses on situations in which there are correct answers that can be known with certainty. The proposal that decision-making is often narrative, especially in contexts of radical uncertainty, suggests important changes to education practice and new questions for education research.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e106
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, C. M., Miller, M. B., & Wolford, G. L. (2009). Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic Salmon: An argument for multiple comparisons correction. Neuroimage, 47(Suppl 1), S125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derksen, M., & Field, S. (2022). The tone debate: Knowledge, self, and social order. Review of General Psychology, 26(2), 172–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudley, J. M., & Bold, G. E. (1996). “Top-down teaching” in noncalculus-based introductory physics classes. American Journal of Physics, 64(4), 418–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2(10), 732–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2016). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832.Google ScholarPubMed
Wieman, C. E. (2007). APS News–The back page. The “curse of knowledge” or why intuition about teaching often fails. American Physical Society News, 16(10).Google Scholar
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed