No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Social robots as social learning partners: Exploring children's early understanding and learning from social robots
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2023
Abstract
Clark and Fischer propose that people interpret social robots not as social agents, but as interactive depictions. Drawing on research focusing on how children selectively learn from social others, we argue that children do not view social robots as interactive toys but instead treat them as social learning partners and critical sources of information.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Aeschlimann, S., Bleiker, M., Wechner, M., & Gampe, A. (2020). Communicative and social consequences of interactions with voice assistants. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, D., & Crowley, K. (2008). Searching for signs of intelligent life: An investigation of young children's beliefs about robot intelligence. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(2), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400801986116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, S. A., Vauthier, S. A., & Bloom, P. (2008). Three- and four-year-olds spontaneously use others’ past performance to guide their learning. Cognition, 107(3), 1018–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breazeal, C., Harris, P. L., DeSteno, D., Westlund, J. M. K., Dickens, L., & Jeong, S. (2016). Young children treat robots as informants. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(2), 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12192CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brink, K. A., & Wellman, H. M. (2020). Robot teachers for children? Young children trust robots depending on their perceived accuracy and agency. Developmental Psychology, 56(7), 1268–1277. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000884CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corriveau, K., & Harris, P. L. (2009). Choosing your informant: Weighing familiarity and recent accuracy. Developmental Science, 12(3), 426–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00792.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corriveau, K. H., Kinzler, K. D., & Harris, P. L. (2013). Accuracy trumps accent in children's endorsement of object labels. Developmental Psychology, 49(3), 470–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030604CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danovitch, J. H., & Alzahabi, R. (2013). Children show selective trust in technological informants. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(3), 499–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.689391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danovitch, J. H., & Keil, F. C. (2008). Young humeans: The role of emotions in children's evaluation of moral reasoning abilities. Developmental Science, 11(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00657.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geiskkovitch, D. Y., Thiessen, R., Young, J. E., & Glenwright, M. R. (2019). What? That's not a chair!: How robot informational errors affect children's trust towards robots. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 48–56).Google Scholar
Girouard-Hallam, L. N., & Danovitch, J. H. (2022). Children's trust in and learning from voice assistants. Developmental Psychology, 58(4), 646. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001318CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Girouard-Hallam, L. N., Streble, H. M., & Danovitch, J. H. (2021). Children's mental, social, and moral attributions toward a familiar digital voice assistant. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 5, hbe2.321. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.321Google Scholar
Harris, P. L. (2012). Trusting what you're told: How children learn from others. Harvard University Press..Google Scholar
Harris, P. L., & Corriveau, K. H. (2011). Young children's selective trust in informants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences, 366(1567), 1179–1187. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0321CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, P. L., Koenig, M., Corriveau, K. H., & Jaswal, V. K. (2018). Cognitive foundations of learning from testimony. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011710CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jipson, J. L., & Gelman, S. A. (2007). Robots and rodents: Children's inferences about living and nonliving kinds. Child Development, 78(6), 1675–1688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01095.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahn, P. H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Gill, B. T., Ruckert, J. H., Shen, S., … Severson, R. L. (2012). Do People Hold a Humanoid Robot Morally Accountable for the Harm it Causes? In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction, pp. 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157689.2157696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, M., Clement, F., & Harris, P. L. (2004). Trust in testimony: Children's use of true and false statements. Psychological Science, 15(10), 694–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00742.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills, C. M. (2013). Knowing when to doubt: Developing a critical stance when learning from others. Developmental Psychology, 49(3), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029500CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Movellan, J., Eckhardt, M., Virnes, M., & Rodriguez, A. (2009). Sociable Robot Improves Toddler Vocabulary Skills. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction – HRI ’09, p. 307. https://doi.org/10.1145/1514095.1514189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noles, N. S., Danovitch, J. H., & Shafto, P. (2015). Children's trust in technological and human informants. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, 6, 1721–1726.Google Scholar
Okita, S. Y., Ng-Thow-Hing, V., & Sarvadevabhatla, R. (2009). Learning together: ASIMO developing an interactive learning partnership with children. In RO-MAN 2009-The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 1125–1130). IEEE.10.1109/ROMAN.2009.5326135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oranç, C., & Ruggeri, A. (2021). “Alexa, let me ask you something different” children's adaptive information search with voice assistants. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(4), 595–605. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, D. M., & Kushnir, T. (2013). Knowledge matters: How children evaluate the reliability of testimony as a process of rational inference. Psychological Review, 120(4), 779–797. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034191CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, F., & Matsuzoe, S. (2012). Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning: Field experiments in a classroom for vocabulary learning. Journal of Human–Robot Interaction, 1(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.1.1.TanakaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, F., Tong, Y., & Danovitch, J. (2019). Who do I believe? Children's epistemic trust in internet, teacher, and peer informants. Cognitive Development, 50, 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Social robots as depictions of social agents
Related commentaries (29)
A more ecological perspective on human–robot interactions
A neurocognitive view on the depiction of social robots
Anthropomorphism, not depiction, explains interaction with social robots
Autonomous social robots are real in the mind's eye of many
Binding paradox in artificial social realities
Children's interactions with virtual assistants: Moving beyond depictions of social agents
Cues trigger depiction schemas for robots, as they do for human identities
Dancing robots: Social interactions are performed, not depicted
Depiction as possible phase in the dynamics of sociomorphing
Fictional emotions and emotional reactions to social robots as depictions of social agents
How cultural framing can bias our beliefs about robots and artificial intelligence
How deep is AI's love? Understanding relational AI
How puzzling is the social artifact puzzle?
Interacting with characters redux
Meta-cognition about social robots could be difficult, making self-reports about some cognitive processes less useful
Of children and social robots
On the potentials of interaction breakdowns for HRI
People treat social robots as real social agents
Social robots and the intentional stance
Social robots as social learning partners: Exploring children's early understanding and learning from social robots
Taking a strong interactional stance
The Dorian Gray Refutation
The now and future of social robots as depictions
The second-order problem of other minds
Trait attribution explains human–robot interactions
Unpredictable robots elicit responsibility attributions
Virtual and real: Symbolic and natural experiences with social robots
When Pinocchio becomes a real boy: Capability and felicity in AI and interactive depictions
“Who's there?”: Depicting identity in interaction
Author response
On depicting social agents