Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T02:30:48.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Determination of Land Rent in a Non-capitalist Agriculture: North India, 1860–1930

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Jayati Ghosh
Jayati Ghosh
Affiliation:
Centre for Economic Studies and Planning Jawaharlal Nehru University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Most economic theories of land rent determination relate to capitalist agriculture. This is true also of the theories of Ricardo and Marx, which were formulated primarily in the context of nineteenth-century English agriculture. These theories share two crucial assumption: cultivation solely for profit and free mobility of capital between agriculture and other sectors. In the Ricardian scheme these assumptions enable land rent to be determined as a residual after wages and profits have been simultaneously determined, because capitalist cultivators will pay rent only as a surplus over the socially average rate of profit.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , May 1988 , pp. 355 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References: Secondary Sources

Ambirajan, S., (1978) Classical Political Economy and British policy in India, Cambridge: C.U.P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, W. J. (1975) British Economic Thought and India, 1600–1858, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bayly, C. A. (1983) Rulers, Townsmen and Bazaars: North Indian Society in the Age of British Expansion 1770–1870, Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, N. (1983) ‘The Logic of Tenancy Cultivation: Central and South-east Punjab, 1870–1935’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, vol. 20 no. 2 pp. 121–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Po-Ta, Chen (1960) a Study of Chinese Land Rent, Peking: Foreign Languages Press.Google Scholar
Commander, S. (1980) ‘The Agrarian Economy of Northern India in the Colonial Period: Aspects of Growth and Stagnation, 1800–1880’, University of Cambridge Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
Dewey, C. (1978) ‘Patwari and Chaukidar: Subordinate Officials and the Reliability of India's Agricultural Statistics’, in Dewey, and Hopkins, (eds) The Imperial Impact, London: Scolar press.Google Scholar
Ghosh, A. K. (1979) Prices and Economic Fluctuations in India, New Delhi: S. Chand and Co.Google Scholar
Ghosh, J. (1983) ‘Non-capitalist Land Rent: Theories and the Case of North India’, University of Cambridge Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
Jones, Richard (1831) An Essay on the Distribution of Wealth and the Sources of Taxation, London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I. (1911) The Development of Capitalism in Russia, Moscow: Progress Publishers 1970.Google Scholar
Malaviya, H. D. (1954) Land Reforms in India, New Delhi: Allied.Google Scholar
Martin, , Montgomery, (1838) The History, Antiquities, Topography and Statistics of Eastern India, vol. II. Reprinted New Delhi 1976.Google Scholar
Marx, , Karl, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, vol. III, London: Lawrence and Wishart 1954.Google Scholar
Mathur, J. K. (1931) The Pressure of Population: Its Effects on Rural Economy in Gorakhpur District, Allahabad.Google Scholar
McAlpin, M. (1983) ‘Price Movements and Fluctuations in Economic Activity’, in Kumar, and Desai, (eds) Cambridge Economic History of India, C.U.P.Google Scholar
Metcalf, T. R. (1979) Land, Landlords and the British Raj: Northern India in the 19th Century, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1848) Principles of Political Economy, 2 vols, London, 7th edition 1871.Google Scholar
Misra, B. R. (1942) Land Revenue Policy in U.P. Under British Rule, Benaras: Nandkishore Publishers.Google Scholar
Musgrave, P. J. (1976) ‘Indian Rural Society: Aspects of the Structure of Rural Society in the U.P., 1860–1921’, University of Cambridge Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
Pandey, G. (1978) The Ascendancy of the Congress in Uttar Pradesh, 1926–1934: A Study in Imperfect Mobilization, Delhi: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Raj, J. (1978) Economic Conflict in Northern India: A Study of Landlord–Tenant Relations in Oudh 1870–1890, Bombay: Allied.Google Scholar
Siddiqi, M. H. (1972) ‘The Peasant Movement in Pratapgarh’, Indian Economic and Social History Review vol. IX no. 3 pp. 305–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddiqi, M. H. (1978) Agrarian Unrest in North India: the United Provinces 1918–1922, New Delhi: Vikas.Google Scholar
Stokes, Eric (1959) The English Utilitarians and India, Oxford: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Stokes, , Eric, (1978) The Peasant and the Raj: Studies in Agrarian Society and Peasant Rebellion in Colonial India, Cambridge: C.U.P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiwari, S. G. (1951) Economic Prosperity of the U.P.: A Study in Provincial Income, Its Distribution and Working Conditions, 1921–1939, New Delhi: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar