Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T09:16:57.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Blea Wyke Beds and the Dogger at Peak, Yorkshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

R. H. Rastall  and
J. E. Hemingway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In our earlier paper on the Petrography of the Blea Wyke Series (1) we stated our intention of describing the Blea Wyke Beds as developed alongside the Peak Fault, or as near to it as possible. This section has never been described, while the brief references to it in the Geological Survey Memoirs (2, 3) are not altogether correct. Here it is stated that “all the beds become thinner in the steep cliffs to the northwards of Blea Wyke, so that below Peak Hall, where they are again accessible, there are not more than 15 feet of the ‘Grey Beds’ and 20 feet of the ‘Yellow Beds’”.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 76 , Issue 8 , August 1939 , pp. 362 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LIST OF REFERENCES

(1) Rastall, R. H., and Hemingway, J. E., The Petrography of the Blea Wyke Series, Geol. Mag., LXXII, 1935, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2) Fox-Strangways, C., The Jurassic Rocks of Britain, i, Mem. Geol. Survey, 1892.Google Scholar
(3) Fox-Strangways, C., and Barrow, G., The Geology of Whitby and Scarborough, Mem. Geol. Survey, 1915.Google Scholar
(4) Richardson, L., The Lower Oolitic Rocks of Yorkshire, Proc. Yorks. Geol. Soc., xvii, 1911, 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5) Wright, T., On the Subdivisions of the Inferior Oolite of the South of England compared with equivalent beds of that formation of the Yorkshire Coast, Quart. Jour. Geol. Soc., xvi, 1860, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar