Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T08:01:04.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Critique of Holyer's Volitionalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

Louis P. Pojman
Louis P. Pojman
Affiliation:
University of Mississippi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Interventions
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , December 1984 , pp. 695 - 700
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 A letter from Robert Holyer to me, dated June 15, 1984, 2.

2 This point was made by an anonymous reviewer of an earlier draft of this article.

3 Pbjman, Louis P., “Believing and Willing”, forthcoming in The Canadian Journal of Philosophy (1985)Google Scholar.

4 Price, H. H., “Belief and Will”, in Ammerman, Robert and Singer, Marcus, eds., Knowledge and Belief (New York: Scribners, 1970)Google Scholar; Pojman, Louis, “Belief and Will”, Religious Studies 15 (1978), 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Pojman, “Believing and Willing”.