Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T21:54:07.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Susceptibility of larvae of the sandfly Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae) to Bacillus sphaericus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

H. Pener*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomology, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel
A. Wilamowski
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomology, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel
*
Dr H. Pener, Laboratory of Entomology, Ministry of Health, PO Box 6115, Jerusalem 91060, Israel.

Abstract

Laboratory experiments were conducted to measure the susceptibility of larvae of the sandfly Phlebotomus papatasi Scopoli to the insect pathogen Bacillus sphaericus applied to the larval breeding medium. B. sphaericus had no effect on larvae aged 30 ± 2 days old, but larvae aged 13 ± 2 and 20 ± 2 days were highly susceptible and a clear dose response effect was detected. When B. sphaericus was left in the rearing medium for 18 days there was a significant increase in larval mortality, indicating persistence and possibly recycling. The results support the feasibility of employing B. sphaericus in the integrated control of sandflies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davidson, E.W., Urbina, M., Rayne, J., Mulla, M.S., Darwazeh, H., Dulmadge, H.T. & Correa, J.A. (1984) Fate ofBacillus sphaericus1593 and 2362 spores used as larvicides in the aquatic environment. Applied Environmental Microbiology 47, 125129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Barjac, H. (1990) Classification ofBacillus sphaericusstrains and comparative toxicity to mosquito larvae. pp. 228236in de Barjac, H. & Sutherland, D.S. (Eds) Bacterial control of mosquitoes and black flies. Rutgers University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Barjac, H., Larget, L. & Killick-Kendrick, R. (1981) Toxicité de Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis, serotype H-14 pour larves de phlebotomes vecteurs de leishmanioses. Bulletin de la Société de Pathohgie Exotique 74, 485489.Google Scholar
Des Rochers, B. & Garcia, R. (1984) Evidence for persistence and recycling of Bacillus sphaericus. Mosquito News 44, 160165.Google Scholar
Karch, S., Monteny, N., Jullien, J.L., Sinegre, G. & Coz, S. (1990) Control of Culex pipiens byBacillus sphaericusand role of nontarget arthropods in its recycling. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 6, 4754.Google Scholar
Killick-Kendrick, R. (1978) Recent advances and outstanding problems in the biology of phlebotomine sandflies. Acta Tropica 35, 297313.Google ScholarPubMed
Lacey, L.A. (1990) Persistence and formulations of Bacillus sphaericus. pp. 284294in de Barjac, H. & Sutherland, D.J. (Eds) Bacterial control of mosquitoes and black flies. Rutgers University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulla, M.S. (1990) Activity, field efficacy and use of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis against mosquitoes. pp. 134160in de Barjac, H. & Sutherland, D.J. (Eds) Bacterial control of mosquitoes and black flies. Rutgers University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutinga, M.J., Ngoka, J.M. & Odhiambo, T.R. (1984) Epidemi-ological investigations of visceral leishmaniasis in the West Pokot district, Kenya. Insect Science and its Application 5, 521525.Google Scholar
Nicolas, L., Dassou-Yovo, J. & Hougard, J-M. (1987) Persistence and recycling ofBacillus sphaericus2362 spores in Culex quincjuefasciatus breeding sites in West Africa. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 25, 341345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozer, N., Bosgelmez, A., Alten, E. & Cakmakci, L. (1994) The effects of various Bacillus thuringiensis andBacillus sphaericusisolates on the different instars of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae. Turkish Journal of Zoology 18, 119121.Google Scholar
Quesada, B.L. & Montoya-Lerma, J. (1994) Laboratory evaluation of chlorfluazuron against larval phlebotomine sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 87, 11291132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlein, Y. (1987) Marking of Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae) by feeding on sprayed coloured sugar bait: a possible means for behavioural and control studies. Transactions of the Royal Society for Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 81, 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlein, Y. & Pener, H. (1990) Bait-fed adult Culex pipiens carry the larvicideBacillus sphaericusto the larval habitat. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 4, 283288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlein, Y., Warburg, A., Schnur, L.F. & Gunders, A.E. (1982) Leishmaniasis in the Jordan Valley II. Sandflies and transmission in the central endemic area. Transactions of the Royal Society for Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 76, 582586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vioukov, V.N. (1987) Control of transmission. pp. 910928in Peters, W. & Killick-Kendrick, R. (Eds) The Leishmaniases in Biology and Medicine. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Walton, W.E. & Mulla, M.S. (1991) Integrated control of Culex tarsalis larvae usingBacillus sphaericusand Gambusia affinis: effects on mosquitoes and nontarget organisms in field mesocosms. Bulletin of the Society of Vector Ecology 16, 203221.Google Scholar
Wraight, S.P., Molloy, D. & Jamnback, H. (1981) Effect ofBacillus sphaericusstrain 1593 against four instars of laboratory reared and field collected Culex pipiens pipiens and laboratory Culex salinarius. Canadian Entomologist 113, 379386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuval, B. & Warburg, A. (1989) Susceptibility of adult phlebotomine sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae) to Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 83, 195196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar