Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:00:53.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-Desarguesian planes and weak associativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2017

R. P. Burn
R. P. Burn*
Affiliation:
Sunnyside, Barrack Road, Exeter EX2 6AB e-mail: rpburn@exeter.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the 19th century various criticisms of Euclid's geometry emerged and alternative axiom systems were constructed. That of David Hilbert ([1], 1899) paid particular attention to the independence of the axioms, and it is his insights which have shaped many of the further developments during the 20th century.

We can, from his insights, define an affine plane as a set of points, with distinguished subsets called lines such that

Axiom 1: Given two distinct points, there is a unique line containing them both.

Axiom 2: Given a line L and a point, p, not contained in L, there is a unique line containing p which does not intersect L.

Axiom 3: There exist at least three points, not belonging to the same line.

Type
Articles
Information
The Mathematical Gazette , Volume 101 , Issue 552 , November 2017 , pp. 458 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © Mathematical Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hilbert, D., Grundlagen der Geometrie; English translation by Townsend, G. J., The foundations of geometry, Open Court, Chicago (1902).Google Scholar
2. Pickert, G., Projective Ebenen, Springer (1955).Google Scholar
3. Hall, M., The theory of groups, Macmillan (1959).Google Scholar
4. Bruck, R. H., A survey of binary systems, Springer (1966).Google Scholar
5. Pflugfelder, H. O., Quasi-groups and loops, Heldermann (1990).Google Scholar
6. Bol, G., Gewebe und Gruppen, Math.Ann. 114 (1937) pp. 414–431.Google Scholar
7. Burn, R. P., Finite Bol loops, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc, 84 (1978) pp. 377–385.Google Scholar
8. Chein, O. and Pflugfelder, H. O., The smallest Moufang loop, Arch. Math. 22 (1971) pp. 573–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Burn, R. P., Deductive transformation geometry, Cambridge (1975).Google Scholar
10. Burn, R. P., Bol quasi-fields and Pappus’ theorem, Math. Zeitschrift, 105 (1968) pp. 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar