Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T12:31:52.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Women Negotiating the Boundaries of Justice in Britain, 1300–1700: An Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2019

Abstract

This introduction places the articles featured in this special issue of the Journal of British Studies within the context of recent scholarship on late medieval and early modern women and the law. It is designed to highlight the many boundaries that structured women's legal agency in Britain, including the procedural boundaries that filtered their voices through male advisers and officials, the jurisdictional boundaries that shaped litigation strategies, the constraints surrounding women's appearance as witnesses in court, the gendered differentiation of rights determined by primogeniture and marital property law, and the boundaries between legal and extralegal activity. Emphasizing the importance of a nuanced approach, it rejects the construction of women's litigation simply as a form of resistance to patriarchal norms and also urges caution against overestimating or oversimplifying the choices available to women in legal disputes or their latitude to operate as autonomous individuals. Gender intersected in British courts with locality, resources, jurisdiction, social status, and familial, religious, and political affiliations to inform different women's access to justice, which involved negotiations between unequal actors within various constraints and in complex alignment with multiple and often competing interests.

Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © The North American Conference on British Studies 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The editors thank Garthine Walker and Patricia Skinner for their contributions to the Women Negotiating the Boundaries of Justice workshop that gave rise to this special issue.

References

1 This collection of articles originated in a workshop held at Cardiff University in April 2016, sponsored by the Arts and Humanities Research Council funded project Women Negotiating the Boundaries of Justice: Britain and Ireland, c. 1100–c. 1750 (AH/L013568/1).

2 Batlan, Felice, “Engendering Legal History,” Law and Social Inquiry 30, no. 4 (Fall 2005): 823–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hardwick, Julie, “Women ‘Working’ the Law: Gender, Authority and Legal Process in Early Modern France,” Journal of Women's History 9, no. 3 (Autumn 1997): 2849CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Batlan, Felice, “Introduction: Making History,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 87, no. 2 (2012): 335–46Google Scholar.

4 Okin, Susan Moller, “Patriarchy and Married Women's Property in England: Questions on Some Current Views,” Eighteenth-Century Studies 17, no. 2 (Winter 1983–84): 121–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Erickson, Amy Louise, Women and Property in Early Modern England (London, 1993)Google Scholar; Spring, Eileen, Law, Land, and Family: Aristocratic Inheritance in England, 1300 to 1800 (Chapel Hill, 1993)Google Scholar; Whittle, Jane, “Inheritance, Marriage, Widowhood and Remarriage: A Comparative Perspective on Women and Land,” Continuity and Change 13, no. 1 (May 1998): 3372CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bardsley, Sandy, “Peasant Women and Inheritance of Land in Fourteenth-Century England,” Continuity and Change 29, no. 3 (December 2014): 297324CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 See, for example, Cioni, Maria, Women and Law in Elizabethan England, with Particular Reference to the Court of Chancery (New York, 1985)Google Scholar; Churches, Christine, “Women and Property in Early Modern England: A Case Study,” Social History 23 (May 1998): 165–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gowing, Laura, Domestic Dangers: Women, Words and Sex in Early Modern London (Oxford, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Leneman, Leah, Alientated Affections: The Scottish Experience of Divorce and Separation, 1684–1830 (Edinburgh, 1998)Google Scholar; Crosswhite, Anastasia B., “Women and Land: Aristocratic Ownership of Property in Early Modern England,” New York University Law Review 77, no. 4 (October 2002): 1119–56Google Scholar; Harris, Barbara, English Aristocratic Women, 1450–1550: Marriage and Family, Property and Careers (Oxford, 2002)Google Scholar; Hanawalt, Barbara, The Wealth of Wives: Women, Law, and Economy in Late Medieval London (Oxford, 2007)Google Scholar; Laurence, Anne, “Women and the Transmission of Property: Inheritance in the British Isles in the Seventeenth Century,” Dix-Septième Siècle 244, no. 3 (2009): 435–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bonfield, Lloyd, “Finding Women in Early Modern English Courts: Evidence from Peter King's Manuscript Reports,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 87, no. 2 (March 2012): 371–91Google Scholar; Butler, Sara, Divorce in Medieval England: From One to Two Persons at Law (London, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Moore, Lindsay, “Women, Property, and the Law in the Anglo-American World, 1630–1700,” Early American Studies 14, no. 3 (Summer 2016): 537–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Spence, Cathryn, Women, Credit and Debt in Early Modern Scotland (Manchester, 2016)Google Scholar.

6 Suzuki, Mihoku, “Daughters of Coke: Women's Legal Discourse in England, 1642–1689,” in Challenging Orthodoxies: The Social and Cultural Worlds of Early Modern Women, ed. Haude, Sigrun and Zook, Melinda S. (Farnham, 2014), 165–92Google Scholar; Hawkes, Emma, “‘[S]he Will … Protect and Defend her Rights Boldly by Law and Reason … ’: Women's Knowledge of Common Law and Equity Courts in Late Medieval England,” in Medieval Women and the Law, ed. James, Noël Menuge (Woodbridge, 2000), 145–61Google Scholar.

7 Staves, Susan, Married Women's Separate Property in England, 1660–1833 (Cambridge, MA, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Erickson, Amy Louise, “Common Law versus Common Practice: The Use of Marriage Settlements in Early Modern England,” Economic History Review 43, no. 1 (February 1990): 2139CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Finn, Margot, “Women, Consumption and Coverture in England, c. 1760–1860,” Historical Journal 39, no. 3 (September 1996): 703–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bailey, Joanne, “Favoured or Oppressed? Married Women, Property and ‘Coverture’ in England, 1660–1800,” Continuity and Change 17, no. 3 (December 2002): 351–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; McIntosh, Marjorie K., “The Benefits and Drawbacks of Femme Sole Status in England, 1300–1630,” Journal of British Studies 44, no. 3 (July 2005): 410–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Erickson, Amy Louise, “Possession—and the Other One-Tenth of the Law: Assessing Women's Ownership and Economic Roles in Early Modern England,” Women's History Review 16, no. 3 (July 2007): 369–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Beattie, Cordelia and Stevens, Matthew Frank, eds., Married Women and the Law in Premodern Northwest Europe (Woodbridge, 2013)Google Scholar; Kane, Bronach and Williamson, Fiona, eds., Women, Agency and the Law, 1300–1700 (London, 2103)Google Scholar; Shepard, Alexandra, “Minding Their Own Business?: Married Women and Credit in Early Eighteenth-Century London,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 25 (December 2015): 5374CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

9 Stretton, Tim, “Coverture and Unity of Person in Blackstone's Commentaries,” in Blackstone and His Commentaries: Biography, Law, History, ed. Prest, Wilfrid (Oxford, 2009), 111–27Google Scholar; Stretton, Tim and Kesselring, Krista J., eds., Married Women and the Law: Coverture in England and the Common Law World (Montreal, 2013)Google Scholar.

10 Churches, Christine, “‘The Most Unconvincing Testimony’: The Genesis and Historical Usefulness of the Country Depositions in Chancery,” Seventeenth Century 17, no. 2 (September 1996): 209–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Wrightson, Keith, “The Politics of the Parish in Early Modern England,” in The Experience of Authority in Early Modern England, ed. Griffiths, Paul, Fox, Adam, and Hindle, Steve (Basingstoke, 1996), 1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Braddick, Michael J., State Formation in Early Modern England, c. 1550–1700 (Cambridge, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hindle, Steve, The State and Social Change in Early Modern England, 1550–1640 (Basingstoke, 2000)Google Scholar.

12 Braddick, State Formation, 101–2.

13 Braddick, Michael J. and Walter, John, “Introduction: Grids of Power: Order, Hierarchy and Subordination in Early Modern Society,” in Negotiating Power in Early Modern Society: Order, Hierarchy and Subordination in Britain and Ireland, ed. Braddick, Michael J. and Walter, John (Cambridge, 2001), 142CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Amussen, Susan Dwyer, An Ordered Society: Gender and Class in Early Modern England (Oxford, 1988)Google Scholar.

14 Amussen, Susan Dwyer, “Punishment, Discipline, and Power: The Social Meanings of Violence in Early Modern England,” Journal of British Studies 34, no. 1 (January 1995): 134CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Walker, Garthine, Crime, Gender and the Social Order in Early Modern England (Cambridge, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shepard, Alexandra, Meanings of Manhood in Early Modern England (Oxford, 2003)Google Scholar.

15 Churches, “Women and Property,” 179.

16 Dolan, Frances E., True Relations: Reading, Literature, and Evidence in Seventeenth-Century England (Philadelphia, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Bailey, Joanne, “Voices in Court: Lawyers’ or Litigants’?,” Historical Research 74, no. 186 (November 2001): 392408CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Medieval scholars of women, by contrast, have paid local courts considerable attention; see, for example, Miriam Muller, “Peasant Women, Agency and Status in Mid-Thirteenth- to Late Fourteenth-Century England: Some Reconsiderations,” in Beattie and Stevens, Married Women and the Law, 91–113; Bardsley, “Peasant Women and Inheritance of Land.”

18 Stretton, Tim, Women Waging Law in Elizabethan England (Cambridge, 1998), 180–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.